OBJECTIVES: Decisions about the management of febrile infants ≤60 days old may be well suited for shared decision making (SDM). Our objectives were to learn about parents' experiences with receiving and understanding information in the emergency department (ED) and their perspectives on SDM, including for decisions about lumbar puncture (LP). METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with 23 parents of febrile infants ≤60 days old evaluated in the pediatric ED at an urban, academic medical center. Interviews assessed parents' experiences in the ED and their perspectives on communication and SDM. Two investigators coded the interview transcripts, refined codes, and identified themes using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Parents' unmet need for information negatively impacted parents' understanding, stress, and trust in the physician. Themes for parents' perspectives on SDM included the following: (1) giving parents the opportunity to express their opinions and concerns builds confidence in the decision making process, (2) parents' preferences for participation in decision making vary considerably, and (3) different perceptions about risks influence parents' preferences about having their infant undergo an LP. Although some parents would defer decision making to the physician, they still wanted to be able to express their opinions. Other parents wanted to have the final say in decision making. Parents valued risks and benefits of having their child undergo an LP differently, which influenced their preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians need to adequately inform parents to facilitate parents' understanding of information and gain their trust. Shared decision making may be warranted for decisions about whether to perform an LP, although parents' preferences for participating in decision making vary.
OBJECTIVES: Decisions about the management of febrile infants ≤60 days old may be well suited for shared decision making (SDM). Our objectives were to learn about parents' experiences with receiving and understanding information in the emergency department (ED) and their perspectives on SDM, including for decisions about lumbar puncture (LP). METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with 23 parents of febrile infants ≤60 days old evaluated in the pediatric ED at an urban, academic medical center. Interviews assessed parents' experiences in the ED and their perspectives on communication and SDM. Two investigators coded the interview transcripts, refined codes, and identified themes using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Parents' unmet need for information negatively impacted parents' understanding, stress, and trust in the physician. Themes for parents' perspectives on SDM included the following: (1) giving parents the opportunity to express their opinions and concerns builds confidence in the decision making process, (2) parents' preferences for participation in decision making vary considerably, and (3) different perceptions about risks influence parents' preferences about having their infant undergo an LP. Although some parents would defer decision making to the physician, they still wanted to be able to express their opinions. Other parents wanted to have the final say in decision making. Parents valued risks and benefits of having their child undergo an LP differently, which influenced their preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians need to adequately inform parents to facilitate parents' understanding of information and gain their trust. Shared decision making may be warranted for decisions about whether to perform an LP, although parents' preferences for participating in decision making vary.
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Gunn E Vist; Alessandro Liberati; Holger J Schünemann Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-05-10
Authors: Paul L Aronson; Marie E Wang; Eugene D Shapiro; Samir S Shah; Adrienne G DePorre; Russell J McCulloh; Christopher M Pruitt; Sanyukta Desai; Lise E Nigrovic; Richard D Marble; Rianna C Leazer; Sahar N Rooholamini; Laura F Sartori; Fran Balamuth; Christopher Woll; Mark I Neuman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Charles Hui; Gina Neto; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Fatemeh Yazdi; Andrea C Tricco; Sophia Tsouros; Becky Skidmore; Raymond Daniel Journal: Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) Date: 2012-03
Authors: Darren Flynn; Meghan A Knoedler; Erik P Hess; M Hassan Murad; Patricia J Erwin; Victor M Montori; Richard G Thomson Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Glyn Elwyn; Dominick Frosch; Richard Thomson; Natalie Joseph-Williams; Amy Lloyd; Paul Kinnersley; Emma Cording; Dave Tomson; Carole Dodd; Stephen Rollnick; Adrian Edwards; Michael Barry Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Eric A Biondi; Brian Lee; Shawn L Ralston; Jared M Winikor; Justin F Lynn; Angela Dixon; Russell McCulloh Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-03-01
Authors: Paul L Aronson; Eduardo Fleischer; Paula Schaeffer; Liana Fraenkel; Mary C Politi; Marney A White Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Colleen K Gutman; K Casey Lion; Paul Aronson; Carla Fisher; Carma Bylund; Antionette McFarlane; Xiangyang Lou; Mary D Patterson; Ahmed Lababidi; Rosemarie Fernandez Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Paul L Aronson; Mary C Politi; Paula Schaeffer; Eduardo Fleischer; Eugene D Shapiro; Linda M Niccolai; Elizabeth R Alpern; Steven L Bernstein; Liana Fraenkel Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 3.451