Literature DB >> 31977683

Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I and Repetitive Penetrating Keratoplasty for Refractory Keratopathy.

Yingxin Chen1, Cuiyu Wang, Qiming Liu, Ziyue Wang, Minghong Gao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of Boston Keratoprosthesis type I (B-KProI) and penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for patients with refractory keratopathy after 1failed PKP in China.
METHOD: The 42 consecutive cases with refractory keratopathy after 1 failed PKP, from July 2010 to December 2014, were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical method: KPro group (n = 21) and PKP group (n = 21). Visual acuity (LogMAR), corneal graft transparency, postoperative complications and corneal graft survival rate were observed. The follow-up time was 2 years. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to analyze the survival rate of the two groups of corneal grafts.
RESULTS: The average best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months in KPro group were significantly lower than PKP group (P < 0.01). The best postoperative visual acuity and BCVA at postoperative 2 years in KPro group were lower than PKP group. The success rate of KPro group (86%) were significantly higher than PKP group (43%) (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in indicate of complications in 2 groups including secondary glaucoma, secondary infectious corneal ulcer, corneal graft melting and endophthalmitis (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Compared with repetitive PKP, B-KProI had a higher success rate, improved postoperative visual acuity, reduced postoperative corneal transplant rejection rates and improved corneal graft survival rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31977683     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  4 in total

Review 1.  The treatment of end-stage corneal disease: penetrating keratoplasty compared with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Steven Bonneau; C Maya Tong; Yelin Yang; Mona Harissi-Dagher
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 2.  Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated Perspectives.

Authors:  Manachai Nonpassopon; Muanploy Niparugs; Maria Soledad Cortina
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-29

3.  Eight-years Egyptian experience of Boston type I keratoprosthesis following failed penetrating keratoplasty or ocular surface disease.

Authors:  Ihab S Othman; Hesham M Gharieb; Hani M G Ibrahim
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-11

4.  Rejection of Acellular Porcine Corneal Stroma Transplantation During Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

Authors:  Li-Na Chen; Ji-Long Hao; Xiu-Fen Liu; Dan-Dan Zhou; Om Prakash Pant; Xiang-Yu Liu; Hui-Feng Liu; Hong-Wei Liu; Cheng-Wei Lu
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 1.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.