Ali Dergham1, Greg Hosier2, Melanie Jaeger3, J Curtis Nickel2, D Robert Siemens2, Thomas McGregor2. 1. School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Prior studies have identified significant knowledge gaps in acute and chronic pain management among graduating urology residents as of five years ago. Since then, there has been increasing awareness of the impact of excessive opioid prescribing on long-term narcotic use and development of adverse narcotic-related events. However, it is unclear whether the attitudes and experience of graduating urology residents have changed. We set out to evaluate the attitudes and experience of graduating urology residents in prescribing opioid/non-opioid analgesia for acute (AP), chronic non-cancer (CnC), and chronic cancer (CC) pain. METHODS: Graduating urology residents were surveyed at a review course in 2018. The survey consisted of open-ended and close-ended five-point Likert scale questions. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Student's t-test were performed. RESULTS: A total of 32 postgraduate year-5 (PGY5) urology residents completed our survey (92% response rate). The vast majority agreed that formal training in managing AP/CnC/CC is valuable (91/78/81%). Most find their training in CnC/CC management to be inadequate and are unaware of any opioid prescribing guidelines; 66% never counsel patients on how to dispose of excess opioids. In general, 88% are comfortable prescribing opioids, whereas most are very uncomfortable prescribing cannabis or antidepressants (100% and 78%, respectively). Residents reported the acute pain service as the highest-rated resource for information, and dedicated textbooks the least. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrated that experience in pain management remains variable among urology residents. Knowledge gaps remain, particularly in the management of CC/CnC pain.
INTRODUCTION: Prior studies have identified significant knowledge gaps in acute and chronic pain management among graduating urology residents as of five years ago. Since then, there has been increasing awareness of the impact of excessive opioid prescribing on long-term narcotic use and development of adverse narcotic-related events. However, it is unclear whether the attitudes and experience of graduating urology residents have changed. We set out to evaluate the attitudes and experience of graduating urology residents in prescribing opioid/non-opioid analgesia for acute (AP), chronic non-cancer (CnC), and chronic cancer (CC) pain. METHODS: Graduating urology residents were surveyed at a review course in 2018. The survey consisted of open-ended and close-ended five-point Likert scale questions. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Student's t-test were performed. RESULTS: A total of 32 postgraduate year-5 (PGY5) urology residents completed our survey (92% response rate). The vast majority agreed that formal training in managing AP/CnC/CC is valuable (91/78/81%). Most find their training in CnC/CC management to be inadequate and are unaware of any opioid prescribing guidelines; 66% never counsel patients on how to dispose of excess opioids. In general, 88% are comfortable prescribing opioids, whereas most are very uncomfortable prescribing cannabis or antidepressants (100% and 78%, respectively). Residents reported the acute pain service as the highest-rated resource for information, and dedicated textbooks the least. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrated that experience in pain management remains variable among urology residents. Knowledge gaps remain, particularly in the management of CC/CnC pain.
Authors: Naji J Touma; Michael J Leveridge; Darren Beiko; Neal Rowe; Jeff Warren; James Watterson; Anne-Sophie Blais; James W L Wilson; Alvaro Morales; Hassan Razvi; Joseph L K Chin; Andrew E MacNeily Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 2.052