Literature DB >> 31976576

Low-dose-oral immunotherapy for children with wheat-induced anaphylaxis.

Ken-Ichi Nagakura1,2, Noriyuki Yanagida1, Sakura Sato3,4, Makoto Nishino1,4, Kyohei Takahashi1,4, Tomoyuki Asaumi1, Kiyotake Ogura1,4, Motohiro Ebisawa2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) use in patients with wheat anaphylaxis is not well studied. We assessed the efficacy of low-dose OIT for patients with wheat-induced anaphylaxis.
METHODS: Eligible subjects were aged 5-18 years with a history of wheat anaphylaxis and confirmed symptoms during oral food challenge (OFC) to 53 mg of wheat protein. After admission to the hospital for a 5-day buildup phase, patients in the OIT group gradually increased wheat ingestion to 53 mg/day and then ingested 53 mg daily at home. One year later, they underwent 53- and 400-mg OFCs after OIT cessation for 2 weeks. The historical control group was defined as patients who avoided wheat during the same period.
RESULTS: Median wheat- and ω-5 gliadin-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) levels were 293 and 7.5 kUA /L, respectively, in the OIT group (16 children). No patients dropped out. Within 1 year, 88% of patients in the OIT group reached 53 mg. After 1 year, 69% and 9% patients passed the 53-mg OFC and 25% and 0% passed the 400-mg OFC in the OIT and control groups (11 children), respectively (P = .002 and 0.07, respectively). In the OIT group, wheat- and ω-5 gliadin-sIgE levels significantly decreased to 154 and 4.1 kUA /L, respectively, at 1 year, and wheat- and ω-5 gliadin-specific IgG and IgG4 levels significantly increased at 1 month. Anaphylaxis developed 7 times and promptly improved without adrenaline.
CONCLUSION: For patients with wheat anaphylaxis, low-dose OIT safely induces immunologic changes, achieves low-dose desensitization, and may allow for a 400 mg dose.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OFC; OIT; anaphylaxis; desensitization; food allergy; immunoglobulin E; oral food challenge; oral immunotherapy; severe; wheat; ω-5 gliadin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31976576     DOI: 10.1111/pai.13220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 0905-6157            Impact factor:   6.377


  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Manifestations of Pediatric Food Allergy: a Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Ling-Jen Wang; Shu-Chi Mu; Ming-I Lin; Tseng-Chen Sung; Bor-Luen Chiang; Cheng-Hui Lin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 2.  Immunological Outcomes of Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy in Food Allergy.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Malby Schoos; Dominique Bullens; Bo Lund Chawes; Joana Costa; Liselot De Vlieger; Audrey DunnGalvin; Michelle M Epstein; Johan Garssen; Christiane Hilger; Karen Knipping; Annette Kuehn; Dragan Mijakoski; Daniel Munblit; Nikita A Nekliudov; Cevdet Ozdemir; Karine Patient; Diego Peroni; Sasho Stoleski; Eva Stylianou; Mirjana Tukalj; Kitty Verhoeckx; Mihaela Zidarn; Willem van de Veen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 3.  The 2020 update on anaphylaxis in paediatric population.

Authors:  Izabela Tarczoń; Ewa Cichocka-Jarosz; Anna Knapp; Przemko Kwinta
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 4.  Oral Immunotherapy in Food Allergy: A Critical Pediatric Perspective.

Authors:  Aysegul Akarsu; Giulia Brindisi; Alessandro Fiocchi; Anna Maria Zicari; Stefania Arasi
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.418

5.  A randomized trial of oral immunotherapy for pediatric cow's milk-induced anaphylaxis: Heated vs unheated milk.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Nagakura; Sakura Sato; Yoko Miura; Makoto Nishino; Kyohei Takahashi; Tomoyuki Asaumi; Kiyotake Ogura; Motohiro Ebisawa; Noriyuki Yanagida
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 5.464

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.