| Literature DB >> 31976213 |
Tiffany Kodak1, Samantha Bergmann2, Brittany LeBlanc3, Michael J Harman4, Maryam Ayazi5.
Abstract
Although Skinner (1957) provided a behavioral account of verbal thinking, additional research is needed to evaluate stimuli that may influence covert verbal behavior that occurs between the onset of a verbal stimulus and the emission of a response during an episode of verbal thinking. The present investigation examined the effects of auditory distractors and/or textual stimuli during arithmetic problems and tangram puzzles on the participants' response latency and accuracy. In addition, we measured and categorized occurrences of vocal verbal behavior during the response interval. In Experiments 1 and 2, the experimenter played auditory distractors during a proportion of arithmetic problems. In Experiment 2, the experimenter also presented a textual stimulus of the arithmetic problem. In Experiment 3, the experimenter played auditory distractors during a proportion of tangram puzzles. Results showed that auditory distractors led to longer response latencies and reduced accuracy in Experiment 1. The addition of the textual stimulus during trials in Experiment 2 improved accuracy and reduced differences in response latency when the auditory distractors were and were not present during the response interval. The auditory distractors during tangram puzzles in Experiment 3 produced no differential effects on accuracy or latency to respond. © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2018.Entities:
Keywords: Echoic behavior; Response latency; Verbal behavior; Verbal thinking
Year: 2018 PMID: 31976213 PMCID: PMC6702476 DOI: 10.1007/s40616-018-0098-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Verbal Behav ISSN: 0889-9401