| Literature DB >> 31976172 |
Rob J MacLennan1, Michael Sahebi1, Nathan Becker1, Ethan Davis1, Jeanette M Garcia2, Matt S Stock1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disuse of a muscle group, which occurs during bedrest, spaceflight, and limb immobilization, results in atrophy. It is unclear, however, if the magnitude of decline in skeletal muscle quality is similar to that for muscle size. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of two weeks of knee joint immobilization on vastus lateralis and rectus femoris echo intensity and cross-sectional area.Entities:
Keywords: Disuse; Muscle; Neuromuscular; Physical therapy; Quadriceps; Ultrasound
Year: 2020 PMID: 31976172 PMCID: PMC6964688 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Use of crutches during knee joint immoblization.
An example of a participant being instructed on proper use of crutches in navigating the community.
Two weeks of knee joint immoblization result in significant increases in vastus lateralis echo intensity.
Mean ± SD echo intensity and cross-sectional area values for each muscle and testing session of the immoblized (A.) and control (B.) limbs. * = p < .05.
| Vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (cm2) | Rectus femoris cross-sectional area (cm2) | ||
| PRE | POST | PRE | POST |
| 16.71 ± 2.85 | 15.60 ± 2.38 | 6.15 ± 1.17 | 5.93 ± 0.86 |
| Vastus lateralis echo intensity (AU) | Rectus femoris echo intensity (AU) | ||
| PRE | POST | PRE | POST |
| 82.77 ± 8.35 | 86.17 ± 9.54* | 82.85 ± 7.61 | 83.25 ± 10.30 |
| Vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (cm2) | Rectus femoris cross-sectional area (cm2) | ||
| PRE | POST | PRE | POST |
| 17.05 ± 3.09 | 16.84 ± 3.59 | 6.17 ± 1.44 | 5.95 ± 1.42 |
| Vastus lateralis echo intensity (AU) | Rectus femoris echo intensity (AU) | ||
| PRE | POST | PRE | POST |
| 86.13 ± 10.47 | 84.26 ± 9.25 | 83.95 ± 10.90 | 83.38 ± 12.21 |
Figure 2Changes in Muscle Quality During Limb Immobilization.
Individual participant data showing changes in echo intensity for the vastus lateralis (A) and rectus femoris (B) of the immobilized limb. The thick, dotted lines correspond to the mean values. The mean ± SD values are displayed for each muscle as well.
Figure 3Changes in Muscle Size During Limb Immobilization.
Individual participant data showing changes in cross-sectional area for the vastus lateralis (A) and rectus femoris (B) of the immobilized limb. The thick, dotted lines correspond to the mean values. The mean ± SD values are displayed for each muscle as well.
Figure 4Significant Associations Between Changes in Muscle Quality and Size.
Scatterplots display the statistically significant correlations between changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and echo intensity (EI) for the vastus lateralis (A) and rectus femoris (B). It is important for the reader to keep in mind that changes in rectus femoris CSA and EI were small and likely not meaningful.