Functionalization of the imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine ring in α-phosphonoacrylates and α-phosphonopropionates via microwave-assisted Mizoroki-Heck reaction.

A series of new phosphonocarboxylates containing an imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine ring has been synthesized via the microwave-assisted Mizoroki-Heck reaction. The efficient modification of the imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine ring has been achieved as late-stage functionalization, enabling and accelerating the generation of a library of compounds from a common precursor.

Introduction

In the last few decades, the Mizoroki–Heck reaction has become one of the main tools in organic synthesis. Its use for the functionalization of a wide range of compounds cannot be overrated [1]. However, as is true for many reactions, the late-stage functionalization of target compounds or their advanced intermediates is rarely an extension of reaction conditions developed for structurally simple analogs. The late-stage approach is especially desirable in the synthesis of a library of compounds from a common precursor and enables efficient generation of new chemical entities.

Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine constitutes an appealing scaffold in medicinal chemistry. It is present in a number of compounds, which exhibit many interesting biological properties. Its privileged character is confirmed by the presence in a number of pharmaceuticals [2-3]. The imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-ring modification via Pd-catalyzed reactions is broadly reported in the literature [3], however, such functionalizations for more complex molecules are not very common. On the other hand, the Mizoroki–Heck reaction is rarely applied for the functionalization of molecules bearing phosphonate or phosphine oxide groups, and the known reactions involve high temperatures (≈100 °C) and long reaction times (in most cases >24 h) [4-7].

Herein we disclose the first method for functionalization of molecules composed of both, an imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine ring and the phosphoryl group. The combination of these functional groups can be found in bisphosphonates and phosphonocarboxylates [8-10] – inhibitors of the therapeutically important enzymes, farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS) and Rab geranylgeranyl transferase (RGGT), respectively.

Results and Discussion

We have previously synthesized a number of phosphonocarboxylates (PC) to study their structure–activity relationship with RGGT, using compounds 1 and 2 as advanced intermediates in the synthesis of RGGT inhibitors (Figure 1) [10-11]. We have found that the presence of a substituent at C6 position of the imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine is favorable for retaining the activity of PC toward RGGT. Such substituents were introduced into the heterocyclic ring via the use of appropriately substituted commercially available 2-aminopyridines. Here, we propose a new and efficient strategy, by which structurally diverse substituents can be attached to the imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine ring, being a part of common precursors, compounds 1 and 2.

Figure 1

Substrates used for the Mizoroki–Heck reaction in this study.

The Mizoroki–Heck reaction-assisted functionalization of 6-bromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carbaldehyde [12], a precursor of compounds 1 and 2, was successfully achieved. We used tri(o-tolyl)phosphine (P(o-tol)3, palladium(II) acetate (Pd(OAc)2) and obtained the desired product (E)-benzyl 3-(6-aminopyridin-3-yl)acrylate in 86% yield (see Supporting Informaiton File 1). However, when the same conditions were applied to alkyl 3-(6-bromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-2-(diethoxyphosphoryl)acrylates 1, no desired product 3 was formed under standard heating conditions (Table 1, entry 1).

Table 1

Summary of optimization studies.

Entrya	Base	Ligand	Pd catalyst	Solvent	T [°C]	t [min]	Yieldb
1c	DIPEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	97	24 h	0
2c	DIPEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	100	40	70d,e
3f	DIPEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	50	58
4g	DIPEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	50	74
5	DIPEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	50	69
6	DIPEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	150	50	–h
7	DIPEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	130	10	51
8	DIPEA	P(t-Bu)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	50	58
9	DIPEA	DABCO	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	50	49
10	DIPEA	P(Cy)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	50	0e
11	DIPEA	–	–	PCN	110	30	0
12	DIPEA	–	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	30	47i
13	DIPEA	–	Pd(PPh3)4	PCN	110	30	17j
14	DIPEA	–	Pd(dba)2	PCN	110	30	42j
15	TEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	50	62
16	Cy2NH	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	50	67
17	Cy2NMe	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	50	62
18	(n-Bu)3N	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	50	69
19	NMM	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	30	32j
20	K2CO3	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	30	13j
21	Cs2CO3	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	30	4j
22	DIPEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN	110	30	91
23	DIPEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN/H2O 100:1	110	50	70
24	DIPEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	PCN/H2O 2:1	110	30	14h
25	DIPEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	DMF/H2O 1:1	110	30	0
26	DIPEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	EtOH/H2O 2:1	110	30	0
27	DIPEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	dioxane/EtOH 1:1	110	30	80
28	DIPEA	P(o-tol)3	Pd(OAc)2	dioxane/EtOH 1:1	110	40	69
29	Na2CO3	–	Pd(PPh3)4	toluene/EtOH/H2O 2:1:2	80	25	0d,e

aThe ratio for most experiments (except for those indicated below): substrate/olefin/ligand/Pd(OAc)2 = 1:1.1:0.05:0.045. bYield of the isolated compound, if not stated otherwise. cSubstrate/olefin/ligand/Pd(OAc)2 = 1:1.5:0.1:0.18. dThe given value represents the degree of conversion. eSubstrate recovered. fSubstrate/olefin/ligand/Pd(OAc)2 = 1:1.5:0.2:0.18. gSubstrate/olefin/ligand/Pd(OAc)2 = 1:1.5:0.05:0.045. hUnidentified products of decomposition. iFifty-eight percent conversion into product were observed after 30 min. A comparable result was obtained after another 30 min under microwave heating. jThis substrate is the main component of the reaction mixture; the yield was estimated based on 31P NMR.

Recently, multiple variants for the application of microwave heating for conducting Mizoroki–Heck reactions have been reported, including the use of heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysts, as well as continuous-flow conditions [13-15]. Therefore, we tested microwave heating, a technique which is known for significant acceleration of the C–C coupling reaction [16]. We carried out the optimization studies using model substrates – compound 1a and benzyl acrylate (Table 1). Compound 1a was prepared according to our previously published procedure (see Supporting Information File 1) [10] as a mixture of diastereomers (E/Z ratio was determined by 31P NMR; the configuration of the double bond CH=CP was determined by 1H NMR vicinal coupling constants 3JHP [10,17]). However, we did not observe any change in this ratio under the applied conditions of the Mizoroki–Heck reaction.

On applying microwave irradiation (100 °C, 40 min), we achieved 70% conversion into product 3 (Table 1, entry 2). In order to improve the conversion into the product, we increased the reaction temperature to 110 °C and prolonged the time to 50 min (Table 1, entry 3) and obtained product 3 with 58% yield. Then, we reduced the loading of the ligand, P(o-tol)3 and catalyst Pd(OAc)2, to one fourth of the loading used in the previous experiment which improved the yield of the isolated product 3 to up to 74% (Table 1, entry 4). Furthermore, reducing the amount of acrylate from 1.5 to 1.1 equiv led to a slight decrease in the yield (from 74% to 69%), but facilitated the purification process (Table 1, entry 5). Therefore, we established 110 °C as the optimal temperature for this reaction, because higher temperatures led to decomposition of the reagents (Table 1, entries 6 and 7), and full conversion into the product was not achieved at lower temperatures (Table 1, entry 2).

The use of other ligands resulted in a decreased yield (for tri-tert-butylphosphine, (P(t-Bu)3) or DABCO), or even complete lack of conversion as in the case of tricyclohexylphosphine (P(Cy)3 (Table 1, entries 8–10). Also no reaction was observed in the absence of Pd(OAc)2 and P(o-tol)3, while partial conversion into product 3 occurred in the presence of Pd(OAc)2 (Table 1, entries 11 and 12). In addition, replacing palladium acetate by tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0), Pd(PPh3)4, or bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladium(0), Pd(dba)2, resulted in a reduction in the yield and a partial recovery of substrate 1a (Table 1, entries 13 and 14).

In the next series of experiments, different amines were tested. The use of triethylamine, dicyclohexylamine (Cy2NH), dicyclohexylmethylamine (Cy2NMe), and tributylamine (n-Bu3N) led to 62–69% yields, while for N-methylmorpholine (NMM), the yield dropped to 32% (Table 1, entries 15–19). The use of inorganic bases also led to very low yields (4–13%) and recovery of substrate (Table 1, entries 20 and 21). N,N-Diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) turned out to be the amine of choice (Table 1, entry 5, yield 69%), because, in most cases, it could be readily separated after the reaction.

A significant improvement was achieved after decreasing the reaction time from 50 to 30 min, which led to 91% yield (Table 1, entry 22). The shorter exposure to microwave heating probably limited the decomposition of the substrate and the product.

Among the various choices of solvents, propionitrile (PCN) delivered the highest amount of product 3, while other solvents led to lower yields (Table 1, entries 23–29). As we have confirmed on selected examples of substrates, the reaction can be also run in acetonitrile (49–98%), with a yield similar to that in the reaction in PCN (50–91%, Scheme 1). The presence of a little amount of water did not impair the reaction (Table 1, entry 23). However, when water was used as co-solvent, the yield significantly dropped, or no product was detected at all (Table 1, entries 24–26).

Scheme 1

Scope of the method for analogs derived from 1 and 2. The ratio of isomers is given (E/Z or β/α) in red, wherever applicable. Yields are given for reactions run at a 100 mg (0.22 mmol) scale, except for compounds 3 (0.88 mmol), 6 (0.44 mmol), 18 (0.11 mmol, 40 min, 100 °C), and 17 (1.08 mmol) as indicated below the appropriate structures. Asterisks indicate yields for the reaction carried out in acetonitrile.

Overall, the optimal conditions for the Mizoroki–Heck reaction of compound 1a and benzyl acrylate were established to involve 5 mol % of Pd(OAc)2, 4.5 mol % of P(o-tol)3, and DIPEA in PCN (or acetonitrile), under microwave heating conditions for 30 min at 110 °C (Table 1, entry 22).

During our optimization studies, we also identified two side products (Figure 2), that were detected in up to 6% each. They were isolated and their identities were confirmed by NMR, MS, and IR analyses. Compound 4 is the product of dehalogenation reaction, which is known to be catalyzed by palladium [1,18]. The second side product, compound 5, is probably the result of the cleavage of the C–CN bond in the solvent (propionitrile or acetonitrile), followed by a palladium-catalyzed cyanation of substrate 1. Recently, acetonitrile was reported as a nontoxic source of cyanide [19-20].

Figure 2

Structures of the identified side products 4 and 5.

Having the optimized conditions in hand, the scope of this transformation was examined using selected olefins and the substrate containing imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine ring embedded either within 2-(diethoxyphosphoryl)acrylate (analogs 1) or 2-(diethoxyphosphoryl)propanoates (analogs 2).

The reaction worked well for a number of acrylates (Scheme 1), providing predominantly products with (E)-geometry of the newly formed double bond (E/Z ratio is above 98:2). Only for analog 11, the formation of the (Z)-product was observed in up to 30%. The configuration of the newly formed double bond was determined based on the vicinal coupling constant 3JHH between CH=CH [(E)-isomer: 3JHH = 16.5 Hz, (Z)-isomer: 3JHH = 12.1 Hz].

We also showed that the method is applicable to styrene and phthalylallylamine, although, for these substrates, a mixture of regioisomers, resulting from α- and β-arylation, was formed (see Supporting Information File 1, Figures S16 and S17, S32 and S33) [21]. In case of the reaction with allyl alcohol, the generated products isomerized in situ to give the saturated aldehydes, compounds 12, 21, and 22, a result being consistent with analogous reactions reported in the literature [22-23].

In the reaction with acrylic acid and acrylamide, substrate 1a was recovered, probably due to the propensity of these acrylic substrates to polymerization. In case of ethyl crotonate and methyl metacrylate, only traces of the desired products were formed. The structures of products 3 and 6–22 were confirmed by spectroscopic methods, 1H, 13C, 31P NMR, and MS analysis. The stereochemistry of the newly formed double bond was evaluated by 1H NMR spectroscopy.

Next, we determined the influence of the position of a halogen substituent in the imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine ring on its reactivity in the Mizoroki–Heck reaction. We confined our studies to the analogs bearing substituents at positions 6, 7, and 8 of the six-membered ring of the imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (1a–f, in Figure 1) [24]. We found that the reaction occurred for the 6- and 7-substituted analogs 1a–c, but no product was observed in the reaction with the 8-halogeno-imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine analog 1d [25]. As the Mizoroki–Heck reaction is sensitive to the electronic properties of the aryl halides, with electron-withdrawing substituents imparting a smaller barrier in the oxidative addition step [26-27], we envisioned that the C8 carbon could be more electron rich than C6 and C7, possibly due to the proximity of the nitrogen atom N1. All the above reactions were run on bromine-substituted analogs. Analogs bearing a strong carbon–chlorine bond did not react, as was observed for substrates 1e and 1f.

Finally, we checked whether the method could be extended to fluorinated analog 23 (Scheme 2). Unfortunately, in this case, the desired product constituted no more than 20% of the reaction mixture, while the main components were the product of dealkylation of the phosphorous ester group, compound 24, and the mixture of substrate 23 and the desired product of the Mizoroki–Heck reaction (Scheme 2 and Figures S69–S71 in Supporting Information File 1).

Scheme 2

Dealkylation of fluorinated analog 23 under the Mizoroki–Heck reaction conditions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have developed a convenient protocol for the functionalization of alkyl 3-(bromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl)-2-(diethoxyphosphoryl)acrylates 1 and propionates 2 using microwave-assisted Mizoroki–Heck reaction. The method worked for a number of olefins, enabling the functionalization of the heterocyclic ring with diverse groups, which can be used for further modifications. Importantly, synthesis of these compounds by standard thermal Heck protocols was ineffective, thus highlighting the importance of employing microwave irradiation for this transformation. Eighteen new compounds were obtained using the developed method. The advantages of the proposed method include operational simplicity, high diastereoselectivity, the wide substrate scope and its applicability to smaller (0.11 mmol) and larger scales (1.1 mmol).

Full experimental details, including copies of spectra (1H NMR, 13C NMR, 31P NMR) of all new compounds. The experimental details and NMR description of the starting compounds synthesized according to our previously published procedure.