BACKGROUND: Treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) induced neuropathic pain (NP) proves to be extremely clinically challenging as the mechanism behind SCINP is poorly understood. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) is largely responsible for the early disruption of the blood spinal cord barrier. This system initiates macrophage infiltration and degradation of myelin, which plays a pivotal role in how NP occurs. In a recent study, we demonstrated that folic acid (FA) treatment to cSCI rats reduced NP and improved functional recovery by repressing MMP-2 expression. We hypothesize that MMP-2 expression is suppressed because FA actively methylates the DNA sequence that encodes for the MMP-2 protein. However, modulation of MMP-2 expression for alleviation of NP is only pertinent to the mid- to late-phase of injury. Therefore, we need to explore alternate therapeutic methods to target the early- to mid-phase of injury to wholly alleviate NP. PURPOSE: Furthering our previous findings on inhibiting MMP-2 expression by FA in mid- and late- phase following cSCI in rats, we hypothesized that FA will methylate and suppress MMP-9 expression during the early- phase, day 1, 3, 7 post cSCI and mid- phase (day 18 post cSCI), in comparison with MMP-2 expression during mid- and the late-phase of cSCI. METHODS: Adult male Sprague Dawley rats (250-270g) underwent cSCI, using a NYU impactor, with 12.5 gm/cm injury. The spinal cord-injured animals were treated intraperitoneally (i.p.) with a standardized dose of FA (80 μg/kg body weight) on day 1, 2, 3, prior to cSCI, followed by daily injection up to 14 or 17 days post-cSCI in different experiments. Animals were euthanized on day 1, 3, 7 post cSCI (early- phase), day 18 post cSCI (mid- phase), and day 42 post cSCI (late-phase) and the epicenter region of injured spinal cord were harvested for MMP-9 and MMP-2 expression analysis by Western blots technique. RESULTS: i) During early-phase on day 1, 3, and 7, the quantitation displayed no statistical significance in MMP-9 expression, between water- and FA- injected rats. ii) On day 18 post-cSCI, FA significantly modulates the expression of MMP-9 (p = 0.043) iii) Comparing results with MMP-2 expression and inhibition, FA significantly modulates the expression of MMP-2 on day 18 post cSCI (FA- and water-injected rats (p = 0.003). iv) In addition, FA significantly modulates the expression of MMP-2 on day 42 post-cSCI comparing FA- and water- injected rat groups (p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: We report that FA administration results in alleviating cSCI-induced NP by inhibiting MMP-9 in the proposed mid- phase of cSCI. However, FA administration resulted in MMP-2 decline during both mid- through late- phase following cSCI. Our study elucidates a new phase of cSCI, the mid-phase. We conclude that further investigation on discovering and quantifying the nature of the mid- phase of SCI injury is needed.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) induced neuropathic pain (NP) proves to be extremely clinically challenging as the mechanism behind SCINP is poorly understood. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) is largely responsible for the early disruption of the blood spinal cord barrier. This system initiates macrophage infiltration and degradation of myelin, which plays a pivotal role in how NP occurs. In a recent study, we demonstrated that folic acid (FA) treatment to cSCI rats reduced NP and improved functional recovery by repressing MMP-2 expression. We hypothesize that MMP-2 expression is suppressed because FA actively methylates the DNA sequence that encodes for the MMP-2 protein. However, modulation of MMP-2 expression for alleviation of NP is only pertinent to the mid- to late-phase of injury. Therefore, we need to explore alternate therapeutic methods to target the early- to mid-phase of injury to wholly alleviate NP. PURPOSE: Furthering our previous findings on inhibiting MMP-2 expression by FA in mid- and late- phase following cSCI in rats, we hypothesized that FA will methylate and suppress MMP-9 expression during the early- phase, day 1, 3, 7 post cSCI and mid- phase (day 18 post cSCI), in comparison with MMP-2 expression during mid- and the late-phase of cSCI. METHODS: Adult male Sprague Dawley rats (250-270g) underwent cSCI, using a NYU impactor, with 12.5 gm/cm injury. The spinal cord-injured animals were treated intraperitoneally (i.p.) with a standardized dose of FA (80 μg/kg body weight) on day 1, 2, 3, prior to cSCI, followed by daily injection up to 14 or 17 days post-cSCI in different experiments. Animals were euthanized on day 1, 3, 7 post cSCI (early- phase), day 18 post cSCI (mid- phase), and day 42 post cSCI (late-phase) and the epicenter region of injured spinal cord were harvested for MMP-9 and MMP-2 expression analysis by Western blots technique. RESULTS: i) During early-phase on day 1, 3, and 7, the quantitation displayed no statistical significance in MMP-9 expression, between water- and FA- injected rats. ii) On day 18 post-cSCI, FA significantly modulates the expression of MMP-9 (p = 0.043) iii) Comparing results with MMP-2 expression and inhibition, FA significantly modulates the expression of MMP-2 on day 18 post cSCI (FA- and water-injected rats (p = 0.003). iv) In addition, FA significantly modulates the expression of MMP-2 on day 42 post-cSCI comparing FA- and water- injected rat groups (p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: We report that FA administration results in alleviating cSCI-induced NP by inhibiting MMP-9 in the proposed mid- phase of cSCI. However, FA administration resulted in MMP-2 decline during both mid- through late- phase following cSCI. Our study elucidates a new phase of cSCI, the mid-phase. We conclude that further investigation on discovering and quantifying the nature of the mid- phase of SCI injury is needed.
In modern medicine, there is a lack of therapeutic options for spinal cord injury
(SCI). Early secondary pathogenesis following SCI is believed to be mediated by
inflammatory responses and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [1]. MMPs are endopeptidases that contribute to growth,
development, wound healing, and pathologies such as arthritis and cancer;
participation in these processes is done through the degradation of extracellular
matrix (ECM) molecules [2]. Furthermore, MMP
activity is much more directed and causes the release of cryptic information from
the ECM. By precisely cleaving large insoluble ECM components and ECM-associated
molecules, MMPs liberate bioactive fragments and growth factors and change ECM
architecture, all of which influence cellular behavior. Thus, MMPs have become a
focal point for understanding matrix biology [3].MMPs are responsible for early disruption of the blood spinal cord barrier, which
initiates macrophage infiltration and degradation of myelin [4]. The expression of MMP-1, -2, -9 and -12 have been confirmed
during first week of post-traumatic human SCIs [5] and they are involved in the destructive inflammatory events of
protein breakdown, phagocytosis by infiltrating neutrophils and macrophages and
enhancing permeability of the blood spinal cord barrier. This leads to hyper
excitability of afferents with action potentials (APs) outlasting the stimulus,
creating central sensitization, a common mechanism of neuropathic pain (NP) [6]. In addition, MMPs are an integral
contributor to inhibitory glial scar formation [6] and both MMP-2 and MMP-9 have been found to participate in this
process [6]. The key findings of the study
[6] highlight the mechanisms that
differentiate between early and late phases of NP pathophysiology. In a nerve injury
model, following injury, MMP-9 induces and MMP-2 maintains NP through interleukin-1β
cleavage and microglia activation at early phase. Inhibition of MMP may provide a
novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of NP at different phases [6]. Through this mechanism, MMPs limit
functional recovery after SCI by the modulation of early vascular events [1]. However, the significant induction of these
MMPs was not supplemented by the expression of their inhibitors, evident in animal
studies, which allows these proteins to exert their effects in the spinal cord
lesion.Observed in an olfactory nerve injury model, MMP-9 expression levels rapidly increase
immediately following an injury, which is consistent with the early phase of NP and
corresponds to neuronal degeneration and increased glial activity [6]. On the other hand, MMP-2 displays a delayed
response and peaks significantly later than MMP-9 [6]. Furthermore, using MMP-9 KO mice, MMP-2 expression has been found to
be independent of MMP-9 expression, suggesting that MMP-2 and MMP-9 may play
different roles in the injury and repair processes [7]. MMP-2 and MMP-9 have been hypothesized, in an acute SCI model, to
contribute to the disruption of the blood-spinal cord barrier and the influx of
leukocytes into a SCI, as well as apoptosis [8]. In addition, MMP-9 and MMP-2 have been found to regulate inflammation
and NP after peripheral nerve injury and may contribute to SCI-induced pain [8]. As an example, early pharmacologic
inhibition of MMPs, or the gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9), have resulted in long-term
neurological recovery and is associated with reduced glial scarring and NP [8].The folate pathway may play a crucial role in the regeneration and repair of the
adult CNS after SCI injury, evident in the rodent model. This repair occurs, in
part, via DNA methylation, which is a major epigenetic mechanism [9]. The effect of folate on the regeneration of
afferent spinal neurons has been found to be biphasic and dose dependent, which
closely relates to its dose range with the expression of de novo
DNA methyltransferases as well as global and gene-specific DNA methylation [10]. Although unprecedented, the FDA approved
dietary folic acid supplement has been found to function as a key methyl donor
through the folate pathway, thus leading to higher levels of methylation in CNS
associated gene, two of which encode for MMP-2 and -9 expression [9]. Therefore, increased DNA methylation levels
in the promoters of MMPs and DNMT inhibitors, as found by previous studies, may
result in reduction of NP and increased functional recovery. This highlights the
underlying epigenetic mechanisms that occur in neuro-repair [11]. Thus, manipulation of the methylation environment may
offer new and safer therapeutic avenues to alleviate NP and promote regeneration and
functional recovery after SCI.Furthermore, while exploring these mechanisms, we have reported chronic NP is
associated with changes in the expression of MMP-2, β-catenin, and ERK. Our data
suggests that the transient up-regulation of phosphorylated ERK (phospho-ERK) is
involved in the initial up-regulation of both β-catenin and MMP-2 following cSCI
induced NP states [12]. In addition, we have
tested the role of folic acid (FA) in modulating MMP-2 expression. FA implementation
in SCI injuries has demonstrated alleviation of NP and functional recovery
improvement in SCI rodents [13]. To explore
the benefits of FA in SCI recovery and NP alleviation, we have targeted MMP-9
regulation during the early stage and MMP-2 in late stage, as these are the times in
which MMP-9 and MMP-2 are at peak expression, respectively. Using natural
methylaters, such as folic acid, we are employing a safer way to alleviate NP and
enhance axonal regeneration and functional recovery. This new pharmacological
approach, with a non-toxic FDA approved dietary supplement, can be a highly
rewarding way to treat NP. We hypothesize that FA will methylate and suppress MMP-9
expression during the early phase and MMP-2 expression during the late phase of SCI
to promote perpetual alleviation of NP.
Methods
Animals
Adult male Sprague Dawley rats, weighing 250 to 280 g weight, were used for this
study. This protocol was in accordance with NIH guidelines and approved by the
University of Wisconsin Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
Spinal cord injury
Adult male Sprague Dawley rats (250–270g) underwent cSCI, using a NYU impactor,
with 12.5 gm/cm injury as per protocol used in earlier studies and well
established in our lab [12-23]. A total of 40 male rats were used to
assure an adequate number of animals exhibiting NP behavior. Briefly, following
the induction of adequate inhalational anesthesia (Isoflurane, induction 5%,
maintenance 2.5%, in a 50: 50 mixtures of oxygen and nitrous oxide), a T9
laminectomy was performed following an impaction, which was done by dropping a
10-g weight from a height of 12.5 mm. Sham control rats underwent laminectomy,
but no contusion. Rats underwent manual bladder expression for a week after
injury or until bladder control was re-established.
Drug administration
Briefly, the spinal cord-injured animals were treated intraperitoneally (IP) with
a standardized dose of FA (80 μg/kg body weight) [13]. For all phases, rats were treated for 3 days prior to
the cSCIs. For the early/acute phases, in addition to prior 3-day treatment
animals were also treated with FA post cSCI injury until one day before
sacrifice day which are 1, 3, and 7. Similarly, for the mid phase of injury, in
addition to prior treatment, rat cohorts were treated on post cSCI day 0 to 17
and sacrificed on day 18. For the late phase of injury, post cSCI, rat cohorts
were treated on days 0 to day 14.
Spinal cord harvest
Animals were euthanized on day 1, 3, 7 post cSCI (early phase), day 18 post cSCI
(mid phase), and day 42 post cSCI (late phase). The epicenter region of injuries
harvested for MMP-9 and MMP-2 expression analysis.
Western Blot analysis
Tissue samples from the epicenter of the injury were lysed using a lysis buffer
(Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). The protein content was determined
through the Lowry’s method. Pre-stained molecular mass markers (Bio-Rad,
Hercules, CA, USA) and the tissues samples (30μg/lane) denatured in SDS reducing
buffer solution (1:2 by volume, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Electrophoresis was
performed in 12.5% tris-HCL gels (Bio-Rad). The resolved proteins were then
transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (PVDF, 0.2 µm; Bio-Rad,
Hercules, CA, USA) and incubated in 5% non-fat dry milk in tris-buffered saline
(TBS) for 30 min. For MMP9 detection the blot was incubated overnight at 4°C
with polyclonal antibody against MMP9 (Anti-MMP9 metalloproteinase, mouse
monoclonal IgG2a; obtained from UC Davis/NIH NeuroMab Facility, supported by NIH
grant and maintained by the Department of Neurobiology) followed by rinsing the
blot in TBS and incubated with standard anti-mouse IgG (1:2,000) for 1.5 h at
room temperature. For MMP2 detection the blot was incubated overnight at 4°C
with polyclonal antibody against MMP2 (H-76, 1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Inc.) followed by rinsing the blot in TBS and incubated with corresponding
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary IgG (1:2,000; Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, CA, USA) for 1.5 h at room temperature. Bound antibody visualized
using the enhanced chemiluminescent solution (Pierce, Thermo Fisher Scientific,
and Rockford, IL, USA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The
chemiluminescent signal captured on autoradiographs (Eastman Kodak, Rochester,
NY, USA) and scanned. The signal’s intensity (including a blank region)
quantitated using the NIH Image J software. The immunoblot was treated in
stripping buffer (Pierce, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) for 30
min and then re-probed with a mouse monoclonal antibody against β-actin
(1:4,000; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) to quantitate the expression of β-actin.
Control and treatment values corrected for blank values and normalized to their
respective β-actin band intensity. β-actin band intensity analyzed using
ImageJ.
Statistical analysis
Statistical significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s
correction for all pairwise comparisons; a significance level, α, of 0.05 was
used.
Results
MMP-9 and MMP-2 Expression Analysis Post-cSCI
To determine the efficacy of FA in MMP-2 and MMP-9 altered expression, we tested
MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in the spinal cord epicenter tissue from SCI rodents
treated with either FA or water IP. Western blots were created using the
epicenter tissues, from the SCI injured rats, harvested on days 1, 3, 7, 18, and
42.
MMP-9 Expression Days 1, 3 and 7: Early Phase of SCI
On days 1, 3 and 7 post SCI (early phase of SCI), rats injected with standardized
doses of FA or water were sacrificed for MMP-9 expression analysis. The
quantitation displayed no statistical significance difference, for days 1, 3,
and 7, in MMP-9 expression between water- (n = 2) and FA- injected rats (n = 2)
(p>0.05) (p-values for days 1, 3, and 7 are 0.175, 0.877, and 0.384,
respectively) (Figures 1).
Fig. 1:
.
A: Western blots of MMP-9 on Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7 in
Folic acid treated and non-treated animals. B: The
normalized intensity values expressed as mean ± SE. The quantitation
displayed no statistical significance, for days 1, 3, and 7, in MMP-9
expression between water- and FA- injected rats (p>0.05).
.
A: Western blots of MMP-9 on Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7 in
Folic acid treated and non-treated animals. B: The
normalized intensity values expressed as mean ± SE. The quantitation
displayed no statistical significance, for days 1, 3, and 7, in MMP-9
expression between water- and FA- injected rats (p>0.05).
MMP-9 Expression Day 18: Mid Phase of SCI
For mid phase analysis, FA or water was administered IP for 3 days pre-cSCI and
17 days post-cSCI followed by western blot analysis on day 18th. The
quantitation of data displayed statistical significant difference between FA- (n
= 4) and water- injected rat groups (n = 4) (p<0.05) when looking at MMP-9
expression (Figure 1). Treatment with
Folic acid (3 days prior to injury and 17 days post injury) significantly
(p-value = 0.043) modulates the expression of MMP-9 on day 18, upon the harvest
of epicenter tissues (Figures 2).
Fig. 2:
.
A: Western blots of MMP-9 on Day 18 in Folic acid
treated and non-treated animals. B: The normalized
intensity values expressed as mean ± SE. The quantitation of data
displayed statistical difference between FA- and water- injected rat
groups (*p<0.05)
.
A: Western blots of MMP-9 on Day 18 in Folic acid
treated and non-treated animals. B: The normalized
intensity values expressed as mean ± SE. The quantitation of data
displayed statistical difference between FA- and water- injected rat
groups (*p<0.05)
MMP-2 Expression Mid Phase (Day 18) and Late Phase (Day 42) of SCI
On day 18 post-cSCI, FA (n = 9) and water (n = 7) injected animals displayed
statistically significant difference (p<0.05). FA significantly modulates the
expression of MMP-2 on day 18, upon the harvest of epicenter tissues, given
injections for 3 days pre- and 17 days post-cSCI (Figures 3).
Fig. 3:
A: Western blots of MMP-2 on day 18 from FA treated and
non-treated animals. B: The normalized intensity values of
blots represented in A, expressed as mean ± SE C: Western
blots of MMP-2 on day 42 from FA treated and non-treated animals.
D: The normalized intensity values of blots represented in C,
expressed as mean ± SE.
The quantitation of data displayed statistical difference between FA- and
water- injected rat groups (*p<0.05)
A: Western blots of MMP-2 on day 18 from FA treated and
non-treated animals. B: The normalized intensity values of
blots represented in A, expressed as mean ± SE C: Western
blots of MMP-2 on day 42 from FA treated and non-treated animals.
D: The normalized intensity values of blots represented in C,
expressed as mean ± SE.The quantitation of data displayed statistical difference between FA- and
water- injected rat groups (*p<0.05)Similarly on day 42 post-cSCI the quantitation of western blots revealed
statistical difference between the FA- (n = 4) and water- (n = 4) injected rat
groups (p-values for day 18 and day 42 are 0.003 and 0.034, respectively)
suggesting FA can modulates the expression of MMP-2 in late phase as well (Figures 3).
Discussion
MMPs are integral contributors to inhibitory glial scar formation [24, 25]
and are responsible for early disruption of the blood spinal cord barrier [4], which initiates macrophage infiltration and
degradation of myelin basic proteins. This leads to hyper excitability of afferents
with action potentials (APs), outlasting the stimulus creating central
sensitization, which is a common mechanism of NP [6, 26, 27]. Both MMP-2 and MMP-9 are known to participate in this
process [6, 28]. Data have shown that inhibiting MMP-9 and MMP-2 significantly
decreases NP in animals that have undergone spinal nerve ligation (SNL) [6]. In addition, MMP-9 and MMP-2 limit
functional recovery after SCI by modulation of early vascular events [1]. The ability to effectively treat
post-cSCI/NP with specific MMP-2 and MMP-9 inhibitors would represent a significant
step forward in determining the underlying mechanisms behind the development of NP.
In line with current and preliminary research, we predicted that high levels of
MMP-9 expression would occur in the early phase and high levels of MMP-2 would occur
in the late phase of injury.Studies have shown that promoter methylation suppresses the transcription of MMP-9;
intrathecal administration of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor, following
chronic constriction injury (CCI), results in the suppression of DNA methylation and
alleviation of NP in rodents [29]. Comparable
to rodents, it has been shown that FA, an FDA approved dietary supplement and key
methyl donor in the CNS, increases axonal regeneration and repair of an injured CNS
via methylation [9,10, 30, 31, 32].Our data shows that FA treatment, after cSCI in rodents, alters the expression of
MMP-9 and MMP-2, alleviates NP, and improves functional recovery after SCI. Although
MMP-9 is purported to be modulated by FA during the early phase of a SCI injury, the
results demonstrate that during the early phase of SCI, FA is unable to have
significant modulation of MMP-9 expression. In a comparable model of spinal nerve
ligation, the primary difference was found in MMP-9 expression, in which it
exhibited rapid and transient upregulation in injured dorsal root ganglion (DRG)
primary sensory neurons during the early phase of NP [6]. MMP-9 produced in the injured DRG neurons serves as one of the
triggers for spinal microglia activation and NP development and that MMP-9-induced
pathophysiology involves IL-1β cleavage and microglia p38 activation [6]. The differences reported in MMP-9 expression
level in our study and this study can be attributed to a variety of reasons: (i)
difference in tissue analysis (i.e. epicenter of injured tissue, targeting spinal
astrocytes, vs DRG); (ii) cell type response; (iii) intrathecal administration vs
intraperitoneal injection.Nonetheless, our results demonstrate two key features of FA (i) It exhibits a
significant effect on MMP-9 and MMP-2 expression; (ii) Modulation of MMP-9 and MMP-2
expression is time and location dependent. As exemplified by the data, and novel
research, MMP-9 modulation, by FA, occurs when MMP-9 is expected to have the
greatest amount of expression (i.e. early phase of injury). On the other hand, MMP-2
modulation, by FA, expresses the greatest amount of modulation at the late phase of
SCI, which is due to the latency of MMP-2 expression from a SCI injury. In addition,
MMP-9 induces NP through interleukin-1β cleavage and microglia activation at early
times, whereas MMP-2 maintains NP through same mechanism at later times. Common
folate deficiencies can be attributed to diet, intestinal degenerative diseases
(i.e. Crohn’s Disease), or defects in homocysteine methyltransferase, which results
in methyl traps that mimic folate deficiency [33]. As we report in this study, FA administration results in
alleviating cSCI-induced NP by suppression MMP expression. Considering both the
novelty and efficacy of folic acid in SCI induced NP treatment, those that
experience folate deficiencies may be more susceptible to SCI injuries [33].The time line for observations in our cSCI model is 42 days as compared with other NP
models demonstrating results in 14 days, which also provide a needed longitudinal
study of expression of MMP-9. Because of the implications of a new phase of injury
that our study shows, it is important that researchers focus their studies on
discovering and quantifying the nature of both early- and mid- phase/transition
phase of SCI injury.
Authors: Mostafa M Ahmed; Sharad Rajpal; Clayton Sweeney; Tiffany A Gerovac; Bradley Allcock; Shannon McChesney; Ami U Patel; Jessica I Tilghman; Gurwattan S Miranpuri; Daniel K Resnick Journal: Spine J Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Angela R Filous; Jared H Miller; Yvette M Coulson-Thomas; Kevin P Horn; Warren J Alilain; Jerry Silver Journal: Dev Neurobiol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.964
Authors: Bermans J Iskandar; Elias Rizk; Brenton Meier; Nithya Hariharan; Teodoro Bottiglieri; Richard H Finnell; David F Jarrard; Ruma V Banerjee; J H Pate Skene; Aaron Nelson; Nirav Patel; Carmen Gherasim; Kathleen Simon; Thomas D Cook; Kirk J Hogan Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Armin Buss; Katrin Pech; Byron A Kakulas; Didier Martin; Jean Schoenen; Johannes Noth; Gary A Brook Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2007-06-26 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Gurwattan S Miranpuri; Dominic T Schomberg; Bahauddeen Alrfaei; Kevin C King; Bryan Rynearson; Vishwas S Wesley; Nayab Khan; Kristen Obiakor; Umadevi V Wesley; Daniel K Resnick Journal: Ann Neurosci Date: 2016-03-11
Authors: Mostafa M Ahmed; HyunKyung Lee; Zach Clark; Gurwattan S Miranpuri; Carrie Nacht; Kush Patel; Lisa Liu; Jiliian Joslin; Douglus Kintner; Daniel K Resnick Journal: Ann Neurosci Date: 2014-07