Literature DB >> 31975714

Effects of different sweeteners on behavior and neurotransmitters release in mice.

Kai-Jing Yin1, Ding-Yuan Xie1, Lei Zhao2, Gang Fan1, Jing-Nan Ren1, Lu-Lu Zhang1, Si-Yi Pan1.   

Abstract

Four natural sweeteners (sucrose, stevioside, maltose and xylitol) and six artificial sweeteners (acesulfame, sucralose, aspartame, cyclamate, saccharin and neotame) were used to study the effects of different sweeteners on the behavior and neurotransmitter release of mice with two-bottle preference experiments. The results showed that very significant preference behavior for 8% sucrose solution, 0.3% stevioside solution, 10 mM acesulfame, 10 mM sucralose and 10 mM aspartame solutions (p < 0.01) was observed on mice. Long-term exposure of sucrose solution and acesulfame solution can affect the behavioral indicators such as solution consumption, feed intake, body weight and the release of neurotransmitters in mice. The solution consumption and the release of neurotransmitters were significantly greater (p < 0.05) than that of the control group (water group), but there was no significant difference in feed intake. The acesulfame-A and acesulfame-B groups had no significant difference on the consumption of solution and feed intake, but there was significant difference in the release of neurotransmitters. The result also showed that different sweetener solutions with similar sweetness had the same effect on the neurotransmitters release, and it can be inferred that mice have an addictive behavioral characteristic to sucrose. © Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mice; Neurotransmitters; Sweeteners; Two-bottle preference test

Year:  2019        PMID: 31975714      PMCID: PMC6952499          DOI: 10.1007/s13197-019-04036-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci Technol        ISSN: 0022-1155            Impact factor:   2.701


  30 in total

1.  Dietary patterns matter: diet beverages and cardiometabolic risks in the longitudinal Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.

Authors:  Kiyah J Duffey; Lyn M Steffen; Linda Van Horn; David R Jacobs; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Epinephrine biosynthesis: hormonal and neural control during stress.

Authors:  Dona Lee Wong
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.046

3.  Diet soda intake is associated with long-term increases in waist circumference in a biethnic cohort of older adults: the San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging.

Authors:  Sharon P G Fowler; Ken Williams; Helen P Hazuda
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 4.  Amphetamine: effects on catecholamine systems and behavior.

Authors:  L S Seiden; K E Sabol; G A Ricaurte
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 13.820

5.  Genotoxicity testing of low-calorie sweeteners: aspartame, acesulfame-K, and saccharin.

Authors:  Atrayee Bandyopadhyay; Sarbani Ghoshal; Anita Mukherjee
Journal:  Drug Chem Toxicol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.356

6.  Sucrose sham feeding on a binge schedule releases accumbens dopamine repeatedly and eliminates the acetylcholine satiety response.

Authors:  N M Avena; P Rada; N Moise; B G Hoebel
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Fat, carbohydrate, and calories in the development of diabetes and obesity in the C57BL/6J mouse.

Authors:  Ann E Petro; Juliann Cotter; Dale A Cooper; John C Peters; Sarah J Surwit; Richard S Surwit
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.694

8.  Aspartame intake is associated with greater glucose intolerance in individuals with obesity.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kuk; Ruth E Brown
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.665

9.  Effects of the Artificial Sweetener Neotame on the Gut Microbiome and Fecal Metabolites in Mice.

Authors:  Liang Chi; Xiaoming Bian; Bei Gao; Pengcheng Tu; Yunjia Lai; Hongyu Ru; Kun Lu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  The effects of water and non-nutritive sweetened beverages on weight loss and weight maintenance: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  John C Peters; Jimikaye Beck; Michelle Cardel; Holly R Wyatt; Gary D Foster; Zhaoxing Pan; Alexis C Wojtanowski; Stephanie S Vander Veur; Sharon J Herring; Carrie Brill; James O Hill
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 5.002

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Sucralose and Cardiometabolic Health: Current Understanding from Receptors to Clinical Investigations.

Authors:  Sydney Risdon; Sylvain Battault; Alonso Romo-Romo; Matthieu Roustit; Loic Briand; Grégory Meyer; Paloma Almeda-Valdes; Guillaume Walther
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Effect of short-term intake of four sweeteners on feed intake, solution consumption and neurotransmitters release on mice.

Authors:  Jing-Nan Ren; Kai-Jing Yin; Gang Fan; Xiao Li; Lei Zhao; Zhi Li; Lu-Lu Zhang; Ding-Yuan Xie; Fang Yuan; Si-Yi Pan
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Effect of different sweeteners on the quality, fatty acid and volatile flavor compounds of braised pork.

Authors:  Zhi-Gui He; Ying Zhang; Ming-Duo Yang; Yu-Qing Zhang; Ying-Ying Cui; Mi-Ying Du; Dong Zhao; Hui Sun
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-08-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.