Literature DB >> 31975601

EPIFANY: A Method for Efficient High-Confidence Protein Inference.

Julianus Pfeuffer1,2,3, Timo Sachsenberg1,2, Tjeerd M H Dijkstra4, Oliver Serang5, Knut Reinert3, Oliver Kohlbacher1,2,4,6,7.   

Abstract

Accurate protein inference in the presence of shared peptides is still one of the key problems in bottom-up proteomics. Most protein inference tools employing simple heuristic inference strategies are efficient but exhibit reduced accuracy. More advanced probabilistic methods often exhibit better inference quality but tend to be too slow for large data sets. Here, we present a novel protein inference method, EPIFANY, combining a loopy belief propagation algorithm with convolution trees for efficient processing of Bayesian networks. We demonstrate that EPIFANY combines the reliable protein inference of Bayesian methods with significantly shorter runtimes. On the 2016 iPRG protein inference benchmark data, EPIFANY is the only tested method that finds all true-positive proteins at a 5% protein false discovery rate (FDR) without strict prefiltering on the peptide-spectrum match (PSM) level, yielding an increase in identification performance (+10% in the number of true positives and +14% in partial AUC) compared to previous approaches. Even very large data sets with hundreds of thousands of spectra (which are intractable with other Bayesian and some non-Bayesian tools) can be processed with EPIFANY within minutes. The increased inference quality including shared peptides results in better protein inference results and thus increased robustness of the biological hypotheses generated. EPIFANY is available as open-source software for all major platforms at https://OpenMS.de/epifany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian networks; bottom-up proteomics; convolution trees; iPRG2016; loopy belief propagation; protein inference

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31975601      PMCID: PMC7583457          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  28 in total

1.  Protein and gene model inference based on statistical modeling in k-partite graphs.

Authors:  Sarah Gerster; Ermir Qeli; Christian H Ahrens; Peter Bühlmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data: the protein inference problem.

Authors:  Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets.

Authors:  Lukas Käll; Jesse D Canterbury; Jason Weston; William Stafford Noble; Michael J MacCoss
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  PIA: An Intuitive Protein Inference Engine with a Web-Based User Interface.

Authors:  Julian Uszkoreit; Alexandra Maerkens; Yasset Perez-Riverol; Helmut E Meyer; Katrin Marcus; Christian Stephan; Oliver Kohlbacher; Martin Eisenacher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  A Scalable Approach for Protein False Discovery Rate Estimation in Large Proteomic Data Sets.

Authors:  Mikhail M Savitski; Mathias Wilhelm; Hannes Hahne; Bernhard Kuster; Marcus Bantscheff
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Unbiased False Discovery Rate Estimation for Shotgun Proteomics Based on the Target-Decoy Approach.

Authors:  Lev I Levitsky; Mark V Ivanov; Anna A Lobas; Mikhail V Gorshkov
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  In-depth analysis of protein inference algorithms using multiple search engines and well-defined metrics.

Authors:  Enrique Audain; Julian Uszkoreit; Timo Sachsenberg; Julianus Pfeuffer; Xiao Liang; Henning Hermjakob; Aniel Sanchez; Martin Eisenacher; Knut Reinert; David L Tabb; Oliver Kohlbacher; Yasset Perez-Riverol
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Protein Inference Using PIA Workflows and PSI Standard File Formats.

Authors:  Julian Uszkoreit; Yasset Perez-Riverol; Britta Eggers; Katrin Marcus; Martin Eisenacher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: a strike against decoy databases.

Authors:  Sangtae Kim; Nitin Gupta; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  OpenMS - an open-source software framework for mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Marc Sturm; Andreas Bertsch; Clemens Gröpl; Andreas Hildebrandt; Rene Hussong; Eva Lange; Nico Pfeifer; Ole Schulz-Trieglaff; Alexandra Zerck; Knut Reinert; Oliver Kohlbacher
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  5 in total

1.  Characterization of peptide-protein relationships in protein ambiguity groups via bipartite graphs.

Authors:  Karin Schork; Michael Turewicz; Julian Uszkoreit; Jörg Rahnenführer; Martin Eisenacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 2.  What Room for Two-Dimensional Gel-Based Proteomics in a Shotgun Proteomics World?

Authors:  Katrin Marcus; Cécile Lelong; Thierry Rabilloud
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2020-08-06

3.  Enhanced protein isoform characterization through long-read proteogenomics.

Authors:  Rachel M Miller; Ben T Jordan; Madison M Mehlferber; Erin D Jeffery; Christina Chatzipantsiou; Simi Kaur; Robert J Millikin; Yunxiang Dai; Simone Tiberi; Peter J Castaldi; Michael R Shortreed; Chance John Luckey; Ana Conesa; Lloyd M Smith; Anne Deslattes Mays; Gloria M Sheynkman
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 13.583

4.  Proteomic analysis of the umbilical cord in fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia.

Authors:  Matthew S Conrad; Miranda L Gardner; Christine Miguel; Michael A Freitas; Kara M Rood; Marwan Ma'ayeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  How Do the Different Proteomic Strategies Cope with the Complexity of Biological Regulations in a Multi-Omic World? Critical Appraisal and Suggestions for Improvements.

Authors:  Katrin Marcus; Thierry Rabilloud
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2020-09-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.