| Literature DB >> 31973736 |
G A Taarnhøj1, C Johansen1,2, H Pappot3.
Abstract
The original article contains a major error whereby a main Table is omitted. Thus, the following corrections to the original article should be considered.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31973736 PMCID: PMC6977286 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1247-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes ISSN: 1477-7525 Impact factor: 3.186
Outcome: Overall QoL
| GRADE issues | Overall GRADE rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nb. of studies | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Publication bias | ||
| Before diagnosis | 1 [12] | X1 | X2 | X3 | |||
| Before treatment | 4 [14, 18-19, 27] | X4, X5 | |||||
| During treatment | 2 [16, 18] | X4 | X6 | X3 | |||
| ≤ 6 months after treatment | 4 [18-19, 27, 34] | X7 | X5 | ||||
| > 6 months after treatment | 7 [13, 20-21, 24-25, 27, 35] | X8 | X9, X5 | None apparent10 | |||
1 Two validated QoL questionnaires with very large difference between outcomes
2 Predominantly NMIBC patients, scores not specific for MIBC population
3 Small number of patients
4 Large difference in populations hence diverging scores
5 Use of different QoL scales
6 Only one study representing metastatic population, no studies representing neoadjuvant population
7 Mixed BC population, selected population [34]
8 Compliance 47-77%, thereby introducing selection bias
9 QoL questionnaires designed for prostate population
10 As estimated by funnel plot