| Literature DB >> 31973105 |
Karolina Kraśniewska1, Sabina Galus2, Małgorzata Gniewosz1.
Abstract
Packaging is an integral part of food products, allowing the preservation of their quality. It plays an important role, protecting the packed product from external conditions, maintaining food quality, and improving properties of the packaged food during storage. Nevertheless, commonly used packaging based on synthetic non-biodegradable polymers causes serious environmental pollution. Consequently, numerous recent studies have focused on the development of biodegradable packaging materials based on biopolymers. In addition, biopolymers may be classified as active packaging materials, since they have the ability to carry different active substances. This review presents the latest updates on the use of silver nanoparticles in packaging materials based on biopolymers. Silver nanoparticles have become an interesting component of biodegradable biopolymers, mainly due to their antimicrobial properties that allow the development of active food packaging materials to prolong the shelf life of food products. Furthermore, incorporation of silver nanoparticles into biopolymers may lead to the development of materials with improved physical-mechanical properties.Entities:
Keywords: biopolymers; edible film and coating; food packaging materials; silver nanoparticles
Year: 2020 PMID: 31973105 PMCID: PMC7037217 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21030698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Antimicrobial activity of various biopolymer-based materials containing silver nanoparticles.
| Polymer Matrices | Approach | Size of Silver Nanoparticles (nm) | Concentration of AgNO3/AgNPs in Film-Forming Solution | Tested Strains | Antimicrobial Effects of Nanocomposite Films | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| agar/banana | in-situ | (a) 100 | AgNO3: | [ | ||
| agar/banana | in-situ | 100–300 | AgNO3: | [ | ||
| cellulose | in-situ | 10–130 | – |
| Inhibition zone (mm) | [ |
| chitosan/HEC | in-situ | – | – | Inhibition zone (mm): | [ | |
| chitosan/ | in-situ | 73 ± 9.54 | AgNO3: |
| Inhibition zone (mm): | [ |
| chitosan adipate/TiO2 | in-situ | 50–100 | AgNO3: | [ | ||
| chitosan | in-situ | 75–250 | – |
| [ | |
| agar | ex-situ: | 21.3–23.8 | AgNPs | [ | ||
| agar | ex-situ: | <100 | Ag-CuNPs | Reduction level of bacteria count | [ | |
| chitosan | ex-situ: | 10–25 | AgNPs: |
| Inhibition zone (mm): | [ |
| guar gum | ex-situ: | <100 | AgNPs: | Reduction level of bacteria count | [ | |
| gelatin | ex-situ: | <100 | AgNPs: | Reduction level of bacteria count | [ | |
| HPMC | ex-situ: | (a) 41 | - | Inhibition zone (mm): | [ | |
| tragacanth/ | ex-situ: | 8–10 | AgNPs: | observed inhibitory effects against all strains of bacteria; | [ | |
| pectin | ex-situ: | 20–80 | AgNPs: | Zone of inhibition (mm): | [ | |
| pullulan | ex-situ: | 6–18 | AgNPs: |
| Fungal growth inhibition (%) | [ |
| pullulan | ex-situ: | 100 | AgNPs: | inhibitory effect against | [ | |
| pullulan | ex-situ: | 100 | AgNPs: | Inhibition zone (mm): | [ | |
| pullulan/PVA | ex-situ: | 15–30 | AgNPs: | bactericidal effect regardless of concentration against both tested strains of bacteria | [ | |
| sodium alginate | ex-situ: | 5–40 | – | inhibitory effect against both tested strains of bacteria was observed | [ | |
| sodium alginate/ | ex-situ: | 5–21 | – | Inhibition zone (mm): | [ | |
| agar | ex-situ | Ag-MTT NPs | Reduction level of bacteria count | [ | ||
| zein | ex-situ | Ag-MTT NPs | (a) 1.53 log CFU/g | [ |
AgNO3—silver nitrate; AgNPs—silver nanoparticles; HEC—hydroxyl ethyl cellulose; HPMC—hydroksypropyl methylocellulose; PVA—poly (vinyl alcohol).