| Literature DB >> 31973064 |
Mohd Asgher1, Susheel Verma2, Nafees A Khan3, Dhiraj Vyas4, Priyanka Kumari2, Shaista Rashid1, Sajid Khan2, Shaista Qadir5, Mohammad Ajmal Ali6, Parvaiz Ahmad6,7.
Abstract
Valeriana wallichii, a perennial herb belonging to family Valerianaceae, is an important medicinal herb of the Himalayan region. The incessant exploitation of nature for meeting the demands of the pharmaceutical industry has put unbearable pressure on its natural habitats. A study on its physiological, biochemical, growth and reproductive attributes was planned. Physiological study revealed that ex-situ (outside their natural habitat) populations faced severe stress as compared to in-situ (natural habitat) plants. The difference in the performance of these habitat plants was related to superoxide and H2O2 in the leaves. Photosynthetic attributes were increased in in-situ populations. Proline content and its biosynthetic enzymes ornithine aminotransferase, and pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase showed an increase in ex-situ plants; proline oxidase decreased. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, shikimic acid dehydrogenese, phenylalanine lyase, and flavonoids content showed an increment in ex-situ plants. Antioxidants enzyme superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase and reduced glutathione showed an increment in ex-situ conditions. Growth and reproductive attributes were more in ex-situ plants. The observations made are suggestive that a comprehensive conservation programme involving in-situ as well as ex-situ strategies will be effective for the conservation and long term survival of the species.Entities:
Keywords: Valeriana wallichii; antioxidants; ex-situ; fruit set; in-situ; photosynthesis; proline
Year: 2020 PMID: 31973064 PMCID: PMC7076705 DOI: 10.3390/plants9020131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Superoxide ions in in-situ and ex-situ grown plants of Valeriana wallichii.
Figure 2Accumulation of H2O2 in in-situ and ex-situ grown plants of Valeriana wallichii.
Content of H2O2, TBARS and GSH, activity of catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxide (APX), total phenolics content, proline content, ornithine aminotransferase, pyrroline-5-corboxylate reductase, proline oxidase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, shikimic acid dehydrogenese, phenylalanine lyase, flavonoids content, carotenoid content and total chlorophyll content in in-situ and ex-situ grown plants of Valeriana wallichii.
| Parameters Studied | In-Situ Grown Plants | Ex-Situ Grown Plants | |
|---|---|---|---|
| H2O2 content (nmol g−1 FW) | 48.2 ± 5.05 b | 70.5 ± 6.8 a | <0.05 * |
| TBARS content (nmol g−1 FW) | 4.8 ± 0.9 b | 14.5 ± 1.2 a | <0.001 *** |
| GSH content (nmol g−1 FW) | 280.3 ± 19 a | 307.2 ± 21 a | 0.3700 |
| Catalase activity (mg protein min−1) | 107.2 ± 5.36 a | 119.6 ± 5.98 a | 0.1611 |
| Superoxide dismutase activity (mg protein min−1) | 4.8 ± 0.24 a | 5.3 ± 0.26 a | 0.1953 |
| Ascorbate peroxidase activity (mg protein min−1) | 0.9 ± 0.04 b | 0.13 ± 0.06 a | <0.001 *** |
| Total phenolics content (mg g−1 DW) | 0.5 ± 0.08 b | 1.2 ± 0.07 a | <0.001 *** |
| Proline content (mg g−1 FW) | 4.1 ± 0.92 b | 12.2 ± 1.2 a | <0.001 *** |
| Ornithine aminotransferase (U mg protein min−1) | 6.2 ± 0.99 a | 9.3 ± 1.1 a | 0.0695 |
| Pyrroline-5corboxylate reductase (P5C) (U mg protein min−1) | 10.4 ± 1.2 a | 12.1 ± 1.3 a | 0.3647 |
| Proline oxidase (U mg protein min−1) | 0.05 ± 0.006 a | 0.03 ± 0.007 a | 0.0619 |
| Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (U mg protein min−1) | 7.2 ± 1.0 b | 18.3 ± 2.1 a | <0.01 ** |
| Shikimic acid dehydrogenese (U mg protein min−1) | 2.2 ± 0.5 a | 3.1 ± 0.6 a | 0.2585 |
| Phenylalanine lyase (U mg protein min−1) | 2.6 ± 0.6 a | 3.4 ± 0.4 a | 0.2995 |
| Flavonoids content (mg g−1 DW) | 0.40 ± 0.008 a | 0.45 ± 0.07 a | 0.001 |
| Total chlorophyll content (mg g−1 FW) | 2.4 ± 0.3 a | 1.8 ± 0.2 a | 0.1347 |
| Carotenoid content (mg g−1 FW) | 0.6 ± 0.02 b | 0.9 ± 0.007 a | <0.001 *** |
Data are presented as treatments mean ± SE (n = 5). SE = standard error; n = number of samples. Different letters show significant difference at p < 0.05 (using Student’s t-test). *, ** and *** present significant, very significant and extremely significant, respectively.
Figure 3Photosynthesis (A), stomatal conductance (B), and intercellular CO2 concentration (C) of in-situ and ex-situ grown plants of Valeriana wallichii. Data are presented as treatments mean ± SE (n = 5). SE = standard error; n = number of samples. The mean difference of in-situ from ex-situ was considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 (using Student’s t-test). Data followed by the same letter are not significantly different.
Figure 4Quantum yield (ΦPSII) (A), chlorophyll fluorescence Fv/Fm (B), and reaction centre ETR (ETo/RC; electron transport flux per active reaction center) (C) in in-situ and ex-situ grown plants of Valeriana wallichii. Data are presented as treatments mean ± SE (n = 5). SE = standard error; n = number of samples. The mean difference of in-situ from ex-situ was considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 (using Student’s t-test). Data followed by the same letter are not significantly different.
Figure 5Fresh weight (A) and dry weight (B) in in-situ and ex-situ grown plants of Valeriana wallichii. Data are presented as treatments mean ± SE (n = 5). SE = standard error; n = number of samples. The mean difference of in-situ from ex-situ was considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 (using Student’s t-test). Data followed by the same letter are not significantly different.
Figure 6Area (A), length of rhizome (B), and length of petiole (C) in in-situ and ex-situ grown plants of Valeriana wallichii. Data are presented as treatments mean ± SE (n = 5). SE = standard error; n = number of samples. The mean difference of in-situ from ex-situ was considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 (using Student’s t-test). Data followed by the same letter are not significantly different.
Reproductive output under in-situ and ex-situ conditions.
| S. No. | Kind of Treatment | No. of Flowers Under Observation | No. of Fruits Formed | No. of Plants to Which the Flowers Belonged | Percent Fruit Set |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Open pollination in-situ conditions | 3647 | 1533 | 21 | 42.03% |
| 2. | Open pollination under ex-situ conditions | 17,241 | 11,125 | 53 | 64.5% |
Figure 7Valeriana wallichii: (A) In-situ seed germination; (B) ex-situ seed germination.
Seed germination in in-situ and ex-situ conditions.
| Activity | March | April | May | August | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In-Situ | Ex-Situ | In-Situ | Ex-Situ | In-Situ | Ex-Situ | In-Situ | Ex-Situ | |
| No. of seeds put for germination | 150 | 150 | 150 | 207 | 150 | 100 | 150 | 139 |
| No. of seeds germinated | 95 | 116 | 65 | 157 | 45 | 73 | 9 | 76 |
Figure 8Mechanism of plant metabolism in in-situ and ex-situ grown Valeriana wallichii.