Literature DB >> 31972949

The paradox between the environmental appeal of bio-based plastic packaging for consumers and their disposal behaviour.

Danny Taufik1, Machiel J Reinders2, Karin Molenveld3, Marleen C Onwezen2.   

Abstract

To realize the potential environmental benefits that recycling and/or composting bio-based plastic packages can deliver, it is important that consumers view bio-based packaging as environmentally-friendly, but also correctly dispose of the packaging. The current experimental lab-in-the-field study was conducted among German consumers (n = 281) and explores whether consumers' perceived environmental benefits of recyclable and compostable bio-based plastic packages match with how consumers dispose of these packages. The results show that consumers only perceive compostable bio-based packages to have more environmental benefits than fossil-based packages. However, consumers dispose of compostable bio-based packages in an incorrect manner (not in line with what is communicated on the packaging label) relatively often. Consumers with a stronger familiarity with bio-based products more often correctly dispose of compostable bio-based packages, but not recyclable bio-based packages, relative to fossil-based packages. Thus, although mainly compostable bio-based plastic packages have strong environmental appeal to consumers, paradoxically this does not translate in the proper disposal actions to fully capitalize on the environmental benefits that bio-based packages can actually deliver. Increasing consumers' bio-based product familiarity might be an avenue to increase the levels of sustainable disposal.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Bio-based; Consumer behaviour; Disposal; Environmental benefits; Packaging; Plastic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31972949     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cereal and Confectionary Packaging: Assessment of Sustainability and Environmental Impact with a Special Focus on Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Authors:  Victoria Krauter; Anna-Sophia Bauer; Maria Milousi; Krisztina Rita Dörnyei; Greg Ganczewski; Kärt Leppik; Jan Krepil; Theodoros Varzakas
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-05-06

2.  Narrowing feedstock exemptions under the Montreal Protocol has multiple environmental benefits.

Authors:  Stephen O Andersen; Song Gao; Suely Carvalho; Tad Ferris; Marco Gonzalez; Nancy J Sherman; Yiyao Wei; Durwood Zaelke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Consumer Cognition and Management Perspective on Express Packaging Pollution.

Authors:  Sisi Wu; Xuan Gong; Yunfei Wang; Jian Cao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Bioplastics for Food Packaging: Environmental Impact, Trends and Regulatory Aspects.

Authors:  Rui M S Cruz; Victoria Krauter; Simon Krauter; Sofia Agriopoulou; Ramona Weinrich; Carsten Herbes; Philip B V Scholten; Ilke Uysal-Unalan; Ece Sogut; Samir Kopacic; Johanna Lahti; Ramune Rutkaite; Theodoros Varzakas
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-10-05

5.  Degradation of Plastics in Simulated Landfill Conditions.

Authors:  Quecholac-Piña Xochitl; Hernández-Berriel María Del Consuelo; Mañón-Salas María Del Consuelo; Espinosa-Valdemar Rosa María; Vázquez-Morillas Alethia
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  Barriers and Enablers to Food Waste Recycling: A Mixed Methods Study amongst UK Citizens.

Authors:  Ayşe Lisa Allison; Fabiana Lorencatto; Susan Michie; Mark Miodownik
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.