Literature DB >> 31972604

Modes of bioprosthetic valve failure: a narrative review.

Alex Koziarz1, Ahmad Makhdoum, Jagdish Butany, Maral Ouzounian, Jennifer Chung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A thorough understanding of the modes of bioprosthetic valve failure is critical as clinicians will be facing an increasing number of patients presenting with failed bioprostheses in coming years. The purpose of this article is to review modes of bioprosthestic valve degeneration, their management, and identify gaps for future research. RECENT
FINDINGS: Guidelines recommend monitoring hemodynamic performance of prosthetic valves using serial echocardiograms to determine valve function and presence of valve degeneration. Modes of bioprosthetic valve failure may be categorized as structural degeneration (calcification, tears, fibrosis, flail), nonstructural degeneration (pannus), thrombosis, and endocarditis. Calcification is the most common form of structural valve degeneration. Predictors of bioprosthetic valve failure include valves implanted in the mitral position, younger age, and type of valve (porcine versus bovine pericardial). Failed bioprosthetic valves are managed with either redo surgical replacement or transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation.
SUMMARY: Several modes of bioprosthetic valve failure exist, which vary based on patient, implant position, and valve characteristics. Further research is required to characterize factors associated with early failure to delay structural valve degeneration and improve patient prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31972604     DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol        ISSN: 0268-4705            Impact factor:   2.161


  8 in total

1.  The role of echocardiography in the management of structural valve degeneration of transcatheter valves.

Authors:  Rahul Shabadi; Pushkar Desai; Nasser Al-Kemyani; Hatim Al-Lawati
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar

Review 2.  Mechanisms and Drug Therapies of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Calcification.

Authors:  Shuyu Wen; Ying Zhou; Wai Yen Yim; Shijie Wang; Li Xu; Jiawei Shi; Weihua Qiao; Nianguo Dong
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.988

3.  Noncalcific Mechanisms of Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Degeneration.

Authors:  Matteo Marro; Alexander P Kossar; Yingfei Xue; Antonio Frasca; Robert J Levy; Giovanni Ferrari
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 4.  Can Heart Valve Decellularization Be Standardized? A Review of the Parameters Used for the Quality Control of Decellularization Processes.

Authors:  F Naso; A Gandaglia
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-17

5.  A Bicentric Propensity Matched Analysis of 158 Patients Comparing Porcine Versus Bovine Stented Bioprosthetic Valves in Pulmonary Position.

Authors:  Bunty Ramchandani; Raúl Sánchez; Juvenal Rey; Luz Polo; Álvaro Gonzalez; Maria-Jesús Lamas; Tomasa Centella; Jesús Díez; Ángel Aroca
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.101

6.  Is cell regeneration and infiltration a double edged sword for porcine aortic valve deterioration? A large cohort of histopathological analysis.

Authors:  Li Li; Xuejing Duan; Hongyue Wang; Yang Sun; Wei Zhao; Yang Lu; Hongyu Xu; Yiwei You; Qingzhi Wang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.174

7.  A valve-in-valve approach to manage severe bioprosthetic tricuspid valve stenosis.

Authors:  Dominika M Zoltowska; Naji Maaliki; Bashar Al-Turk; Andres M Pineda Maldonado; Srinivasan Sattiraju
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Early Basal Cuspal Tear of a Porcine Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Causing Massive Mitral Regurgitation.

Authors:  Muhammed Tamim; Christos Alexiou; Yaser AlKadi; Mohsen S Mahmoud; Fatema Qaddoura
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2020-11-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.