Jesse J Keller1, Jacob P Johnson2, Emile Latour3. 1. Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: kellerje@ohsu.edu. 2. Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. 3. Biostatistics Shared Resource, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inpatient dermatology has been shown to improve patient outcomes at a reduced cost. Few hospitals have dermatologists available. Teledermatology may allow dermatologists to assess hospitalized patients remotely. OBJECTIVE: To examine the diagnostic concordance between a hospitalist, dermatologist, and teledermatologist using store-and-forward teledermatology. METHODS: For 100 consecutive patients requiring inpatient dermatology consultation, a survey was conducted by all 3 raters to convey diagnostic impressions and therapeutic recommendations. Complete and partial agreements were assessed using the Cohen kappa statistic. RESULTS: Inpatient dermatology consultation often resulted in a change in diagnosis (50.9%) and a change in systemic therapy (41.5%). Likewise, virtual teledermatology consultation would have resulted in a change in diagnosis (54.7%) and a change in systemic therapy (47.2%) at similar rates. Comparing the dermatologist and teledermatologists, diagnostic complete and partial agreement were 52.8% and 84.9%, respectively. Systemic therapy agreement was 77.4%. Teledermatologists recommended biopsy more often (68.5% vs 43.5%). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, tertiary academic medical center, single rater for inpatient teledermatology with specific inpatient niche. CONCLUSION: Teledermatologists performed comparably to an in-person dermatologist for the diagnosis and management of hospitalized patients with skin conditions. Teledermatology may be a suitable alternative for delivery of inpatient care if no dermatologist is available.
BACKGROUND: Inpatient dermatology has been shown to improve patient outcomes at a reduced cost. Few hospitals have dermatologists available. Teledermatology may allow dermatologists to assess hospitalized patients remotely. OBJECTIVE: To examine the diagnostic concordance between a hospitalist, dermatologist, and teledermatologist using store-and-forward teledermatology. METHODS: For 100 consecutive patients requiring inpatient dermatology consultation, a survey was conducted by all 3 raters to convey diagnostic impressions and therapeutic recommendations. Complete and partial agreements were assessed using the Cohen kappa statistic. RESULTS: Inpatient dermatology consultation often resulted in a change in diagnosis (50.9%) and a change in systemic therapy (41.5%). Likewise, virtual teledermatology consultation would have resulted in a change in diagnosis (54.7%) and a change in systemic therapy (47.2%) at similar rates. Comparing the dermatologist and teledermatologists, diagnostic complete and partial agreement were 52.8% and 84.9%, respectively. Systemic therapy agreement was 77.4%. Teledermatologists recommended biopsy more often (68.5% vs 43.5%). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, tertiary academic medical center, single rater for inpatient teledermatology with specific inpatient niche. CONCLUSION: Teledermatologists performed comparably to an in-person dermatologist for the diagnosis and management of hospitalized patients with skin conditions. Teledermatology may be a suitable alternative for delivery of inpatient care if no dermatologist is available.
Authors: Stacie Vilendrer; Mary E Lough; Donn W Garvert; Monique H Lambert; Jonathan Hsijing Lu; Birju Patel; Nigam H Shah; Michelle Y Williams; Samantha M R Kling Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Patrick A Massey; Kaylan McClary; Andrew S Zhang; Felix H Savoie; R Shane Barton Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: J M Lombardi; T Bottiglieri; N Desai; K D Riew; V Boddapati; M Weller; C Bourgois; S McChrystal; R A Lehman Journal: Spine J Date: 2020-05-31 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Stacie Vilendrer; Sarah Sackeyfio; Eliel Akinbami; Roy Ghosh; Jacklyn Ha Luu; Divya Pathak; Masahiro Shimada; Emmanuelle Elise Williamson; Lisa Shieh Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-03-30