Literature DB >> 31971549

Medicare Reimbursement for Balloon Catheter Dilations Among Surgeons Performing High Volumes of the Procedures to Treat Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

David A Kasle1, Sina J Torabi1, Vishal Narwani1, R Peter Manes1.   

Abstract

Importance: Chronic rhinosinusitis is among the most common and costly conditions treated by physicians. After failure of medical treatment, surgical intervention in the form of endoscopic sinus surgery is traditionally offered. Balloon catheter dilation (BCD) has become a less-invasive alternative with increasing popularity among otolaryngologists. Objective: To evaluate the most recent BCD data in the Medicare population, with a specific focus on the percentage of procedures performed by surgeons who perform high volumes of this procedure, their reimbursements, and their national geographic distributions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective review included data from 2011 through 2017 from Medicare Part B National Summary Data Files and Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data. Patients with procedures including Current Procedural Terminology codes 31295 (maxillary sinus dilation), 31296 (frontal sinus dilation), and 31297 (sphenoid sinus dilation) were included. Exposures: Balloon catheter dilation of the paranasal sinuses. Main Outcomes and Measures: Total and mean reimbursements over time to physicians for BCDs, as well as the percentage of BCDs performed by and reimbursed to ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeons who perform high volumes of BCDs (>10 procedures) in a given year.
Results: The total number of BCDs rose from 7496 in 2011 to 43 936 in 2017 (a 486% increase). The overall reimbursement increased from $11 773 049 in 2011 to $63 927 591 in 2017 (a 433% increase). From 2012 to 2016, ENT surgeons who performed high volumes of the procedures rose from 101 to 382 surgeons (a 270% increase). In 2016, 25 214 of 41 960 BCDs (60.1%) were performed by ENT surgeons performing high volumes of the procedure, compared with 5603 of 13 109 procedures (42.7%) in 2012. In a line of best fit, at the 75th percentile of procedure volume, there was an increase of 4.2 BCDs in the median number of procedures done per physician per year, compared with an increase of 1.5 BCD procedures per physician per year in the line of best fit for the 50th percentile. Conclusions and Relevance: Balloon catheter dilation continues to increase in popularity among otolaryngologists treating chronic rhinosinusitis. Most BCDs are performed by ENT surgeons who perform high volumes of the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31971549      PMCID: PMC6990810          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.4357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  11 in total

1.  Trends in common rhinologic illnesses: analysis of U.S. healthcare surveys 1995-2007.

Authors:  Jose L Mattos; Charles R Woodard; Spencer C Payne
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.858

2.  Direct costs of adult chronic rhinosinusitis by using 4 methods of estimation: Results of the US Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Authors:  Lisa Caulley; Kednapa Thavorn; Luke Rudmik; Chris Cameron; Shaun J Kilty
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 3.  Current indications for balloon sinuplasty.

Authors:  Cemal Cingi; Nuray Bayar Muluk; Jivianne T Lee
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Utilization and reimbursements for sinus procedures: A five-year analysis.

Authors:  Lindsey K Koester; Parul Goyal
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Paranasal Sinus Balloon Catheter Dilation for Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua M Levy; Michael J Marino; Edward D McCoul
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Medical therapy versus sinus surgery by using balloon sinus dilation technology: A prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Spencer C Payne; Pablo Stolovitzky; Neelesh Mehendale; Keith Matheny; William Brown; Anthony Rieder; Douglas Liepert; Ewen Tseng; Andrew Gould; Scott Powell; Daniel Van Himbergen; Boris Karanfilov; Daniel Harfe; Laura England; Christopher Melroy
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.467

7.  Balloon Catheter Dilation of the Sinuses: A 2011-2014 MarketScan Analysis.

Authors:  David W Jang; Cecily Abraham; Derek D Cyr; Kristine Schulz; Ralph Abi Hachem; David L Witsell
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Office-based balloon sinus dilation: a prospective, multicenter study of 203 patients.

Authors:  Boris Karanfilov; Stacey Silvers; Raza Pasha; Ashley Sikand; Alan Shikani; Michael Sillers
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.858

Review 9.  Cost of adult chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kristine A Smith; Richard R Orlandi; Luke Rudmik
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 10.  Intranasal steroids versus placebo or no intervention for chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Lee Yee Chong; Karen Head; Claire Hopkins; Carl Philpott; Anne G M Schilder; Martin J Burton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.