Literature DB >> 31970684

Patient Engagement in Medical Device Design: Refining the Essential Attributes of a Wearable, Pre-Void, Ultrasound Alarm for Nocturnal Enuresis.

Noreen Caswell1, Kaya Kuru2, Darren Ansell2, Martin J Jones2, Benjamin Jon Watkinson2, Peter Leather3, Andrew Lancaster4, Paula Sugden4, Eleanor Briggs5, Carl Davies2, Chooi Oh6, Kina Bennett7, Christian DeGoede4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, no pre-void wearable alarm exists to treat nocturnal enuresis (NE)-night-time bedwetting, and children with NE and their families are disappointed in relation to the post-void moisture alarms and medicine currently available. Development of a safe, comfortable and non-invasive wearable pre-void alarm and associated technology, using advanced mechatronics, is underway (the MyPAD device). Each stage of development includes patient and public involvement (PPI), particularly with respect to human factors, in collaboration with physicians, radiologists, psychologists, nurses, engineers and designers.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to help us understand the families' experience of the condition of enuresis, and to provide opinion relating to existing NE alarms, designed to detect moisture, and most importantly, the initial design of the MyPAD wearable technology.
METHODS: A PPI workshop in the form of a focus group, made up of children with enuresis and their parents, was conducted during the early stage of the MyPAD product development. The key research questions (RQs) were: (RQ1) What were the families' experiences of using existing post-void enuresis alarms? (RQ2) What do families like about the MyPAD prototype? and (RQ3) What do families not like about the MyPAD prototype? A nurse specialised in terms of NE treatment, including post-void alarms, from the Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and two MyPAD design engineers were also present, to explain the MyPAD design concept. Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach to thematic analysis was implemented, which included familiarisation with the data, initial descriptive coding, identifying themes, reviewing themes, defining and labelling themes and producing a report.
RESULTS: Four common themes were identified from the focus group discussions: the importance of sleep; children do not want to feel different; parents feel frustrated and concerned; resilience and perseverance. These themes applied across the research questions; for example, sleep disruption was highlighted as an issue with existing post-void alarms and as an important requirement for the design of MyPAD. The evaluation of the early version of the MyPAD device has prompted the consideration of changes to some existing facets of the device, including providing multiple alarm types, more options for the design of the garment that houses the device, and the need for clear, age-appropriate and informative instructions relating to how the device should be used, in order to maximise its performance/efficiency and acceptance.
CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative data derived from the focus group discussion was incredibly valuable as it enabled the research and design team to experience the perspectives of the families in terms of the challenges and conflicts of managing the condition and the limited utility of existing post-void alarms. This has improved our understanding of the social and environmental challenges that will need to be considered during the design process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31970684     DOI: 10.1007/s40290-019-00324-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmaceut Med        ISSN: 1178-2595


  27 in total

1.  'You feel helpless, that's exactly it': parents' and young people's control beliefs about bed-wetting and the implications for practice.

Authors:  M J Morison; D Tappin; H Staines
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Randomized comparison of long-term desmopressin and alarm treatment for bedwetting.

Authors:  Jonathan Evans; Birgitta Malmsten; Alison Maddocks; Harbans Singh Popli; Henri Lottmann
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.830

3.  Living with a young person who wets the bed: the families' experience.

Authors:  M J Morison
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2000 May 11-24

4.  Behavioral and self-concept changes after six months of enuresis treatment: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  S Longstaffe; M E Moffatt; J C Whalen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Nocturnal enuresis in children and young people: NICE clinical guideline.

Authors:  Norma O'Flynn
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Fifty years of enuretic alarms.

Authors:  W I Forsythe; R J Butler
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Evaluation of and treatment for monosymptomatic enuresis: a standardization document from the International Children's Continence Society.

Authors:  Tryggve Neveus; Paul Eggert; Jonathan Evans; Antonio Macedo; Søren Rittig; Serdar Tekgül; Johan Vande Walle; C K Yeung; Lane Robson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Exploring potential mechanisms in alarm treatment for primary nocturnal enuresis.

Authors:  Richard J Butler; Philip Holland; Sarah Gasson; Sally Norfolk; Lucy Houghton; Mike Penney
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007

9.  Relationship of sleep quality and quality of life in children with monosymptomatic enuresis.

Authors:  P Ertan; O Yilmaz; M Caglayan; A Sogut; S Aslan; H Yuksel
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 2.508

10.  Practical consensus guidelines for the management of enuresis.

Authors:  Johan Vande Walle; Soren Rittig; Stuart Bauer; Paul Eggert; Daniela Marschall-Kehrel; Serdar Tekgul
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.183

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Analyzing Healthcare Facility Resilience: Scientometric Review and Knowledge Map.

Authors:  Lingzhi Li; Shuni Liao; Jingfeng Yuan; Endong Wang; Jianjun She
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-08

Review 2.  Meaningful patient and public involvement in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Baines; Hannah Bradwell; Katie Edwards; Sebastian Stevens; Samantha Prime; John Tredinnick-Rowe; Miles Sibley; Arunangsu Chatterjee
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 3.318

3.  Patient Perceptions of and Preferences Between Characteristics of Injectable Diabetes Treatments.

Authors:  Kristina S Boye; Jessica B Jordan; Raleigh E Malik; Brooke M Currie; Louis S Matza
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.945

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.