Michele Maruccia1, Rossella Elia2, Angela Gurrado3, Marco Moschetta4, Eleonora Nacchiero1, Alberto Bolletta5, Mario Testini3, Giuseppe Giudice1. 1. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124, Bari, Italy. 2. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124, Bari, Italy. rossellaelia4@gmail.com. 3. Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124, Bari, Italy. 4. Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124, Bari, Italy. 5. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction is increasingly offered to breast cancer patients, as the one-stage technique has proved surgical and oncological safety and aesthetic effectiveness. Nevertheless, there are limited data on outcomes after pre-pectoral breast reconstruction in large and ptotic breasts. The aim of the paper is to present the authors' experience in performing Wise pattern mastectomy with pre-pectoral implant and complete acellular dermal matrix (ADM) coverage as a single-stage procedure in patients with large ptotic breasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of protective collected data from January 2017 to June 2019 of patients who presented with large and ptotic breasts undergoing skin-reducing mastectomy and immediate pre-pectoral breast reconstruction with complete ADM coverage and inferior dermal sling was performed. Oncological and surgical outcomes were collected. Satisfaction with reconstruction and related quality of life were evaluated through BREAST-Q questionnaire. RESULTS: Nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria. The average patient age was 55.6 years, and the mean body mass index was 31.2. Mean follow-up was 23.2 months from the initial reconstruction. One patient experienced seroma, and two cases of wound dehiscence at the T junction were observed and treated conservatively with no implant loss. All patients were satisfied with the final reconstruction. CONCLUSION: The Wise pattern skin-reducing mastectomy and pre-pectoral breast reconstruction could be offered to patients presenting with large and ptotic breasts. Future studies should better define long-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
OBJECTIVES: Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction is increasingly offered to breast cancer patients, as the one-stage technique has proved surgical and oncological safety and aesthetic effectiveness. Nevertheless, there are limited data on outcomes after pre-pectoral breast reconstruction in large and ptotic breasts. The aim of the paper is to present the authors' experience in performing Wise pattern mastectomy with pre-pectoral implant and complete acellular dermal matrix (ADM) coverage as a single-stage procedure in patients with large ptotic breasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of protective collected data from January 2017 to June 2019 of patients who presented with large and ptotic breasts undergoing skin-reducing mastectomy and immediate pre-pectoral breast reconstruction with complete ADM coverage and inferior dermal sling was performed. Oncological and surgical outcomes were collected. Satisfaction with reconstruction and related quality of life were evaluated through BREAST-Q questionnaire. RESULTS: Nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria. The average patient age was 55.6 years, and the mean body mass index was 31.2. Mean follow-up was 23.2 months from the initial reconstruction. One patient experienced seroma, and two cases of wound dehiscence at the T junction were observed and treated conservatively with no implant loss. All patients were satisfied with the final reconstruction. CONCLUSION: The Wise pattern skin-reducing mastectomy and pre-pectoral breast reconstruction could be offered to patients presenting with large and ptotic breasts. Future studies should better define long-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Entities:
Keywords:
ADM; Breast cancer; Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction
Authors: Leonardo Cattelani; Susanna Polotto; Maria Francesca Arcuri; Giuseppe Pedrazzi; Chiara Linguadoca; Elena Bonati Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2017-12-02 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Raghavan Vidya; Jaume Masià; Simon Cawthorn; Giorgio Berna; Fernando Bozza; Alexander Gardetto; Agnieszka Kołacińska; Francesco Dell'Antonia; Cesare Tiengo; Franco Bassetto; Glenda G Caputo; Maurizio Governa Journal: Breast J Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Allen Gabriel; Steven Sigalove; Noemi M Sigalove; Toni L Storm-Dickerson; Jami Rice; Nicole Pope; G Patrick Maxwell Journal: Aesthet Surg J Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 4.283
Authors: Stacey J Jones; Philip Turton; Rajgopal Achuthan; Brian V Hogan; Shireen N Mckenzie; Baek Kim Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2020-12-17