Literature DB >> 31970407

Harm Perceptions of E-cigarettes Among Smokers With and Without Mental Health Conditions in England: A Cross-Sectional Population Survey.

Charlie Albert Smith1, Lion Shahab1, Ann McNeill2, Sarah E Jackson1, Jamie Brown1, Leonie Brose2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: E-cigarettes (ECs) may benefit smokers with mental health conditions who are more likely to smoke, and smoke more heavily, than those without mental health conditions. This could be undermined if harm misperceptions in this group are high as is the case in the general population. This study aimed to assess EC harm perceptions relative to cigarettes as a function of mental health status and a variety of characteristics.
METHODS: Data were collected from 6531 current smokers in 2016/2017 in household surveys of representative samples of adults. The associations of mental health status (self-reported mental health condition and past year treatment), smoking and EC use characteristics, and characteristics relating to use of potential information sources with harm perceptions of ECs relative to cigarettes (measured by correct response "less harmful" vs. wrong responses "more harmful," "equally harmful," "don't know") were analyzed with logistic regression.
RESULTS: A similar proportion of smokers without mental health conditions (61.5%, 95% CI 60.1-62.9) and with mental health conditions (both with [61.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 58.7-63.8] and without past year treatment [61.5%, 95% CI 58.1-64.7]) held inaccurate EC harm perceptions (all P > 0.05). Being female, nonwhite, aged 25-34 compared with 16-24, from lower social grades (C2, D, and E), not having post-16 qualifications, no EC experience, a daily smoker, unmotivated to quit <1 month, non-internet user and non-broadsheet reader were all associated with more inaccurate harm perceptions (all p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of smokers in England have inaccurate harm perceptions of ECs regardless of mental health status. IMPLICATIONS: This study is the first to use a nationally representative sample in order to investigate whether smokers with and without mental health conditions differ with regard to harm perceptions of ECs. Findings show that the majority of smokers in England hold inaccurate harm perceptions of ECs, and this does not differ as a function of mental health status. A number of characteristics associated with disadvantaged groups were significantly associated with inaccurate harm perceptions. These findings highlight the need to improve awareness and understanding among disadvantaged groups regarding the relative harms of ECs compared with tobacco.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 31970407      PMCID: PMC7885771          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  37 in total

1.  News media representations of electronic cigarettes: an analysis of newspaper coverage in the UK and Scotland.

Authors:  Catriona Rooke; Amanda Amos
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Differences in E-Cigarette Uptake Among Cigarette Smokers: Longitudinal Analysis of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.

Authors:  Alyssa F Harlow; Andrew Stokes; Daniel R Brooks
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 3.  Assessing motivation to quit smoking in people with mental illness: a review.

Authors:  Ranita Siru; Gary K Hulse; Robert J Tait
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  'The smoking toolkit study': a national study of smoking and smoking cessation in England.

Authors:  Jennifer A Fidler; Lion Shahab; Oliver West; Martin J Jarvis; Andy McEwen; John A Stapleton; Eleni Vangeli; Robert West
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Psychological distress and responses to comparative risk messages about electronic and combusted cigarettes.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Claire Adams Spears; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.591

6.  Nicotine delivery to users from cigarettes and from different types of e-cigarettes.

Authors:  Peter Hajek; Dunja Przulj; Anna Phillips; Rebecca Anderson; Hayden McRobbie
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Mental health professionals' perceptions, judgements and decision-making practices regarding the use of electronic cigarettes as a tobacco harm reduction intervention in mental healthcare: A qualitative focus group study.

Authors:  Charlie Albert Smith; Ann McNeill; Loren Kock; Zoyah Ahmed; Lion Shahab
Journal:  Addict Behav Rep       Date:  2019-05-02

Review 8.  Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Hayden McRobbie; Chris Bullen; Rachna Begh; Lindsay F Stead; Peter Hajek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-14

9.  Association between electronic cigarette use and changes in quit attempts, success of quit attempts, use of smoking cessation pharmacotherapy, and use of stop smoking services in England: time series analysis of population trends.

Authors:  Emma Beard; Robert West; Susan Michie; Jamie Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-09-13

10.  Harm perceptions of electronic cigarettes and nicotine: A nationally representative cross-sectional survey of young people in Great Britain.

Authors:  Katherine East; Leonie S Brose; Ann McNeill; Hazel Cheeseman; Deborah Arnott; Sara C Hitchman
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.492

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cigarette Use, E-Cigarette Use, and Dual Product Use Are Higher Among Adults With Serious Psychological Distress in the United States: 2014-2017.

Authors:  Andrea H Weinberger; Jiaqi Zhu; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Katarzyna Wyka; Renee D Goodwin
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Evaluating the effectiveness of e-cigarettes compared with usual care for smoking cessation when offered to smokers at homeless centres: protocol for a multi-centre cluster-randomized controlled trial in Great Britain.

Authors:  Sharon Cox; Linda Bauld; Rachel Brown; Matthew Carlisle; Allison Ford; Peter Hajek; Jinshuo Li; Caitlin Notley; Steve Parrott; Francesca Pesola; Deborah Robson; Kirstie Soar; Allan Tyler; Emma Ward; Lynne Dawkins
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 7.256

3.  Clearing the Haze: What Do We Still Need to Learn about Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems?

Authors:  Lisa M Fucito; Hannah Malinosky; Stephen R Baldassarri; Roy S Herbst
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-11-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.