| Literature DB >> 31970336 |
Haiyue Sun1,2, Xiaoman Hua1,2, Minghao Zhang1,2, Yu Wang1,2, Yiying Chen1,2, Jing Zhang1,2, Chao Wang1,2, Yuhua Wang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
It is necessary to add protective agents for protecting the probiotic viability in the preparation process of probiotics starter. In this study, we used whey protein concentrate (WPC), pullulan, trehalose, and sodium glutamate as the protective agent and optimized the proportion of protective agent and spray-drying parameters to achieve the best protective effect on Lactobacillus plantarum. Moreover, the viable counts of L. plantarum in starter stored at different temperatures (-20°C, 4°C, and 25°C) for 360 days were determined. According to response surface method (RSM), the optimal proportion of protective agent was 24.6 g/L WPC, 18.8 g/L pullulan, 16.7 g/L trehalose and 39.3 g/L sodium glutamate. The optimum spray-drying parameters were the ratio of bacteria to protective agents 3:1 (v: v), the feed flow rate 240 mL/h, and the inlet air temperature 115°C through orthogonal test. Based on the above results, the viable counts of L. plantarum was 12.22±0.27 Log CFU/g and the survival rate arrived at 85.12%. The viable counts of L. plantarum stored at -20°C was more than 1010 CFU/g after 200 days. © Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources.Entities:
Keywords: Lactobacillus plantarum; protective agent; spray drying; starter
Year: 2020 PMID: 31970336 PMCID: PMC6957444 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2019.e94
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 2636-0772
Factors and levels in the response surface design
| Levels | WPC (g/L) | Pullulan (g/L) | Trehalose (g/L) | Sodium glutamate (g/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | |
| −1 | 20 | 10 | 5 | 30 |
| 0 | 30 | 20 | 51 | 40 |
| 1 | 40 | 30 | 25 | 50 |
WPC, whey protein concentrate.
Factors and levels in the orthogonal test
| Levels | Ratio of bacteria to protective agents (v:v) | Feed flow rate (mL/h) | Temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | |
| 1 | 2:1 | 210 | 110 |
| 2 | 3:1 | 240 | 115 |
| 3 | 4:1 | 270 | 120 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for protective agents
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F-value | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 6.43 | 14 | 0.59 | 43.58 | <0.0001*** |
| A-WPC | 0.3 | 1 | 0.3 | 28.84 | <0.0001*** |
| B-pullulan | 0.021 | 1 | 0.021 | 1.98 | 0.1816 |
| C-trehalose | 0.016 | 1 | 0.016 | 1.53 | 0.2364 |
| D-sodium glutamate | 0.011 | 1 | 0.011 | 1.08 | 0.3158 |
| AB | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 47.16 | <0.0001*** |
| AC | 0.47 | 1 | 0.47 | 44.52 | <0.0001*** |
| AD | 0.16 | 1 | 0.16 | 14.80 | 0.0018** |
| BC | 0.002 | 1 | 0.002 | 0.19 | 0.6678 |
| BD | 0.45 | 1 | 0.45 | 42.59 | <0.0001*** |
| CD | 0.048 | 1 | 0.048 | 4.59 | 0.0502 |
| A2 | 0.41 | 1 | 0.41 | 39.00 | <0.0001*** |
| B2 | 1.76 | 1 | 1.76 | 166.73 | <0.0001*** |
| C2 | 3.12 | 1 | 3.12 | 295.55 | <0.0001*** |
| D2 | 1.07 | 1 | 1.07 | 101.82 | <0.0001*** |
| Residual | 0.15 | 14 | 0.011 | ||
| Cor total | 6.58 | 28 | |||
| r2=0.9776, r2adj=0.9551 | |||||
WPC, whey protein concentrate.
Fig. 1.Response surface plot (a) of WPC (A) and pullulan (B) interaction.
Response surface and contour plot (b) of WPC (A) and trehalose (C) interaction. Response surface plot (c) of WPC (A) and sodium glutamate (D) interaction. Response surface plot (d) of pullulan (B) and sodium glutamate (D) interaction. Response surface plot (e) of pullulan (B) and trehalose (C) interaction. Response surface plot (f) of trehalose (C) and sodium glutamate (D) interaction on the viable counts of Lactobacillus plantarum after spray drying. WPC, Whey protein concentration.
Results and analyses of orthogonal test
| Run | A | B | C | Viable bacterial Log CFU/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11.77 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12.47 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 11.89 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12.50 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11.94 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 12.23 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11.27 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12.02 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 12.23 |
| K1 | 36.13 | 35.54 | 36.02 | |
| K2 | 36.67 | 36.43 | 37.20 | |
| K3 | 35.52 | 36.35 | 35.10 | |
| k1 | 12.043 | 11.847 | 12.007 | |
| k2 | 12.223 | 12.143 | 12.400 | |
| k3 | 11.840 | 12.117 | 11.700 | |
| r | 0.383 | 0.296 | 0.700 | |
| Order | C>A>B | |||
| Optimal level | A2 | B2 | C2 |
A, ratio of bacteria to protective agents; B, feed flow rate; C, temperature.
Fig. 2.SEM micrographs of Lactobacillus plantarum starter.
A was magnified 6,000× and B was magnified 10,000×. SEM, scanning electron microscope.
Fig. 3.Changes of viable counts of Lactobacillus plantarum during storage at the temperature of −20°C, 4°C, and 25°C for 360 d.
○, −20°C; □, 4°C; ●, 25°C.