Amal Zaid1, Nawaf Abu-Khalaf1, Samer Mudalal2, Massimiliano Petracci3. 1. College of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Palestine Technical University-Kadoorie (PTUK), Tulkarm B.O.Box 7, Palestine. 2. Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box 7, Nablus, Palestine. 3. Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 47521 Cesena (FC), Italy.
In the last few decades, tremendous improvements have been achieved in growth rate
and breast yield of poultry birds, to meet the growing demand for poultry meat
(Mudalal et al., 2015). Globally, the
productivity of poultry meat has been enhanced by intentional genetic selection
using traditional quantitative techniques (Zuidhof
et al., 2014). The genetic selection was companied by histological and
biochemical modifications in the muscular tissues of growing birds (Petracci and Cavani, 2012). It was found that
genetically selected birds had low blood capillary vessels’ density which led
to some disorders metabolism (Soglia et al.,
2018a). Accordingly, this was companied by emergence of several muscle
abnormalities such as Pale Soft exudative (PSE) (Petracci et al., 2017), Deep pectoralis myopathy (DPM).
Recently, new muscle abnormalities have been observed such as white striping (WS)
and hardening of the breast muscle known as ‘wooden breast’ (Kuttappan et al., 2017). Moreover,
intramuscular connective tissue defects characterized by a loose structure of muscle
fiber bundles called ‘spaghetti meat’, has been recently observed
(Baldi et al., 2018; Maiorano, 2017). The previous poultry meat defects were
attributed due to a consequence of substantial improvement towards increasing growth
rate and breast yield (Petracci et al.,
2015).All previously mentioned defects in turkey and chicken meat (in particular breast
meat) are considered as a serious problems to poultry industries because they
affected adversely the quality traits of premium cuts (Soglia et al., 2018b). These defects impaired visual appearance
as well as reduced technological properties such as water holding capacity, texture,
and color. Accordingly, this was negatively reflected on consumer acceptance (Kuttappan et al., 2017). The classification
systems for affected meat by muscle abnormalities are still based on aesthetic
criteria (variations in the color of the meat, whether the meat is too pale or too
red, and/or excessive fluid accumulation), couldn’t make an exact judgment to
deal with meat quality issues (Barbut, 2009).
The affected meat should be culled out from the processing line and transformed them
for further processed meat (such as nuggets and sausages) while the rest of the
carcass is suitable for human consumption (Brambila
et al., 2017).Differences in meat composition due to increase muscle abnormalities have imposed
more pressure on the meat industries to guarantee good meat quality. Concerning
production and meat evaluation, there is a need to look for rapid, non-destructive
and non-expensive techniques.Over the last years, the use of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) as instrumental
technique with spectrum wavelength (800–2,500 nm) has increased enormously.
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR) has the ability to estimate and predict different
quality traits in food products by measuring the amount of NIR radiation that is
reflected, absorbed, transmitted, and/ or scattered at different wavelengths (Gardner, 2018).NIR spectroscopy technique was employed to evaluate the chemical composition of meat
and meat products (Van Kempen, 2001). It has
unique advantages if compared with classical methods such as quick and frequent
measurements, and the ease of sample preparation. Moreover, it is fit for on-line
applications in the agriculture field (Abu-Khalaf,
2015; Beghi et al., 2018),
pharmaceutical industries (Guillemain et al.,
2017), as well as medical sectors (Monteyne et al., 2018) to assess different quality traits. On another
hand, NIRS has still some limitations where there is a necessity for reference
method, low sensitivity to minor constituents, as well as complexity in the
calibration (Buning-Pfaue, 2003).The ability of NIRS to predict several quality traits of meat such as chemical
composition (protein, moisture, fat, and collagen), pH, water holding capacity, etc
have been investigated (Brondum et al., 2000;
Meulemans et al., 2002; Moran et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018). Moreover, it was found that there was a
possibility to classify meat based on feeding regimes (Cozzolino et al., 2002), strains (McDevitt et al., 2005), and tenderness (Yancey et al., 2010) by using NIR spectroscopy.There are no available studies that used visible-near infrared (VIS/NIR) spectroscopy
to predict the quality traits of turkey breast meat affected by different levels of
WS. Therefore, the main objective of this research is to employ VIS/NIR spectroscopy
to differentiate different levels of WS defects.
Materials and Methods
Samples selection and preparation
From a local Palestinian slaughterhouse near Tulkarm city (Palestine), more than
60 the pectoralis major muscles of 20-wk old tom turkey birds
were randomly selected based on the appearance of white striations. The
evaluation of the presence of WS was performed on the processing line at
1–2 h of post-mortem after the breast- deboning area. Out 60
pectoralis major muscles, 34 muscles were classified into
three groups: normal (12 samples) (free of white striations), moderate (12
samples) (when white striations thickness <1 mm), and severe (10 samples)
(when white striations thickness >1 mm) (Soglia et al., 2018b). Samples were subjectively pre-classified into
categories, packed on ice, and transported to Palestine Technical
University-Kadoori laboratory for VIS/NIR measurements then to An-Najah National
University laboratories for other quality traits analysis. The
pectoralis major muscles were excised from the whole breast
muscle. Excessive fat, connective tissue, cartilage, and bone fragments were
avoided to minimize sampling errors.
VIS/NIR spectroscopy measurements
In each turkey breast meat sample (n=34), three spectra were collected (at a room
with a temperature of 23±2ºC and relative humidity of 60%)
directly on the skin side, radial section, and tangential section. A USB2000+
miniature fiber optic spectrometer (Ocean Optics, Largo, FL, USA) with a vivo
light source and 50 μm fiber optics probe was used for spectra
acquisition. The spectra were obtained at scans with a resolution of 0.35 nm
full width at half maximum (FWHM), and spectra range 550–1,100 nm. It
also has a 2048-element CCD-array detector, 2-MHz analog-to-digital (A/D)
converter, in addition to a high-speed USB 2.0 port. The USB2000+ can be
controlled by Spectra Suite software. This device is equipped with an active fan
cooling to overcome the risk of sample overheating. The 4 halogen tungsten light
sources make the vivo a high-powered VIS/NIR source, which allows a shorter
integration time than conventional methods (Ocean Optics). The integration time
used in this investigation was 1,340 μs. A total of 102 spectra were
obtained for turkey samples, and then the average spectra were taken. The
VIS/NIR analyses were performed in the diffuse reflectance mode and then
recorded as absorbance (log 1/R). To ensure the stability of the measurements, a
diffuse reflectance standard WS-1 (Ocean Optics) was used as the optical
reference standard for the system every 5 minutes during the experiment. The
dark reference was done once at the beginning of each experiment, by closing the
entrance of incoming light from probe to the USB2000+ miniature fiber optic
spectroscopy using a plastic cap. At the end of all spectral measurements, the
acquired data were well stored for later analysis. The 34 samples were used for
building PLS calibration models using their VIS/NIR spectra.
Statistical analysis
The Unscrambler program (version 9.7, CAMO Software AS, Oslo, Norway) was used
for both principal component analysis (PCA) and PLS multivariate data analysis
(Abu-Khalaf, 2015). In PCA, VIS/NIR
spectra represented a bilinear model of the data matrix X. PCs represent in a
pattern of observations in plots.To investigate the possible differences in three types of turkey breast meat
(normal, moderate and severe) at three ranges, i.e. VIS (550–700 nm), NIR
(700–1,100 nm) and VIS/NIR (550–1,100 nm) wavelengths, a PCA model
was carried out.
Results and Discussion
Typical mean spectral curves representing the three levels of WS fillets in the
wavelength range 550–1,100 nm are shown in Fig.
1. The depressions and peaks in spectra showed the strong and weak
absorbance characteristics of the samples, within the range of study. The spectra of
normal, moderate (WS) and severe (WS) breast fillets showed similar absorption
bands, which were in agreement with previous studies (Barbut, 1996; Fumiere et al.,
2000).
Fig. 1.
A typical VIS/NIR (500–1,100 nm) spectral curve obtained from
turkey fillets.
Normal fillets (◊, red), moderate WS fillets (○, blue) and
severe WS (□, green) fillets, without pre-processing. VIS/NIR,
visible-near infrared/near-infrared spectroscopy; WS, white striping.
A typical VIS/NIR (500–1,100 nm) spectral curve obtained from
turkey fillets.
Normal fillets (◊, red), moderate WS fillets (○, blue) and
severe WS (□, green) fillets, without pre-processing. VIS/NIR,
visible-near infrared/near-infrared spectroscopy; WS, white striping.NIR spectra often contain undesired scattering variation due to heterogeneous content
and sample surface amongst others. The scattering effect in NIR consists of a
multiplicative effect and an additive effect. The additive effect is reflected as
the baseline offset. The multiplicative effect is reflected as a slope that scales
the entire spectrum. Data pre-treatment was employed to minimize these complex
baseline variations and scattering effects. NIR spectra of the samples set were
pre-processed using standard normal variate (SNV) to delete slope variation and to
correct for scattering effects (Fig. 2). Light
scattering in fresh meat samples does not always travel the same distance before it
is detected. As a longer light traveling path corresponds to a lower relative
reflectance value while more light is absorbed (Jens
et al., 2019). This causes a parallel translation of the spectra. For
that reason, multiplicative scatter correction (MSC) was used to eliminate these
effects (Li and He, 2006) (Fig. 3). Savitzky-Golay first derivatives
(1st D) was done to delete baseline flung in meat spectral data and
small spectral differences were strengthened, this followed by Savitzky-Golay
smoothing (Cunha et al., 2010) to prevent
increasing the noise, which came from the derivative (Fig. 4; Li and He, 2006). The
relative values of spectra may vary from sample to sample, which might be due to
changes in surface texture and moisture content of three types of fillets (Mudalal, 2019; Soglia et al., 2018a; Soglia et al.,
2018b).
Fig. 2.
The effect of Standard Normal Variate (SNV) preprocessing on the spectra
obtained from turkey fillets.
Normal fillets (◊, red), moderate WS fillets (○, blue) and
severe WS (□, green) fillets. WS, white striping.
Fig. 3.
Effect of Multiplicative Scatter Correction (MSC) preprocessing on the
spectra that obtained from turkey fillets.
Normal fillets (◊, red), moderate WS fillets (○, blue) and
severe WS (□, green) fillets. WS, white striping.
Fig. 4.
The effect of the first derivative and smoothing preprocessing on the
spectra obtained from turkey fillets with different absorption
bands.
Normal fillets (◊, red), moderate WS fillets (○, blue) and
severe WS (□, green) fillets. WS, white striping.
The effect of Standard Normal Variate (SNV) preprocessing on the spectra
obtained from turkey fillets.
Normal fillets (◊, red), moderate WS fillets (○, blue) and
severe WS (□, green) fillets. WS, white striping.
Effect of Multiplicative Scatter Correction (MSC) preprocessing on the
spectra that obtained from turkey fillets.
Normal fillets (◊, red), moderate WS fillets (○, blue) and
severe WS (□, green) fillets. WS, white striping.
The effect of the first derivative and smoothing preprocessing on the
spectra obtained from turkey fillets with different absorption
bands.
Normal fillets (◊, red), moderate WS fillets (○, blue) and
severe WS (□, green) fillets. WS, white striping.Six bands (peaks at 550, 574, 580, 600, 630, and 643 nm) in the visible region
(550–700 nm) and eight bands in the NIR region have been observed (Fig. 4). Several researchers found similar bands
and spectral features (Andres et al., 2008;
Barlocco et al., 2006; De Marchi et al., 2012). Absorption bands at
550 to 580 nm were associated to the Soret band attributed to the traces of
erythrocytes of myoglobin with both haemoglobin and oxyhaemoglobin absorption as
well as to oxymyoglobin (Liu and Chen,
2000).Our findings showed that severe and moderate WS fillets had higher absorption at 550,
574, and 580 nm than normal fillets. This result may be attributed due to
discoloration over the surface of white striped fillets (Ellekjaer and Isaksson, 1992). The mean spectrum in the NIR
region has absorption bands at 980 nm and it could be related to the second overtone
of the OH- vibrational mode of water (Bowker et al.,
2014). The absorption at 760 and 908 nm corresponds to the
deoxhaemoglobin (Hollo et al., 1987) and the
third overtones of C-H bonds, respectively. The identified band at 552 nm related to
myoglobin (Cozzolino et al., 1996).
Absorption band at 574 nm was associated with oxyhemoglobin (Mitsumoto et al., 1991). The absorption bands at 540 and 580 nm
were associated with both myoglobin and oxymyoglobin, respectively (Cozzolino and Murray, 2004).PCA has been carried for VIS/NIR regions spectrum considering the three levels of
muscle abnormalities (normal, moderate and severe). PCA showed an ability to
distinguish the three groups (normal, moderate WS and severe WS) from each other
(Figs. 5–7).
Fig. 5.
Score plot of PCA model based on VIS (550–700 nm) spectra of
turkey fillets.
Normal fillets (N), moderate WS fillets (M) and severe WS (S) fillets. Two
PCs explained 99% of the data variation. PCA, principal component analysis;
VIS, visible-near infrared; WS, white striping; PC, principal component.
Fig. 7.
Score plot of PCA model based on VIS/NIR (550–1,100 nm) spectra of
turkey fillets.
Normal fillets (N), moderate WS fillets (M) and severe WS (S) fillets. Two
PCs explained 98% of the data variation. PCA, principal component analysis;
VIS/NIR, visible-near infrared/ near-infrared spectroscopy; WS, white
striping; PC, principal component.
Score plot of PCA model based on VIS (550–700 nm) spectra of
turkey fillets.
Normal fillets (N), moderate WS fillets (M) and severe WS (S) fillets. Two
PCs explained 99% of the data variation. PCA, principal component analysis;
VIS, visible-near infrared; WS, white striping; PC, principal component.
Score plot of PCA model based on NIR (700–1,100 nm) spectra of
turkey fillets.
Normal fillets (N), moderate WS fillets (M) and severe WS (S) fillets. Two
PCs explained 100% of the data variation. PCA, principal component analysis;
NIR, Near-infrared spectroscopy; WS, white striping; PC, principal
component.
Score plot of PCA model based on VIS/NIR (550–1,100 nm) spectra of
turkey fillets.
Normal fillets (N), moderate WS fillets (M) and severe WS (S) fillets. Two
PCs explained 98% of the data variation. PCA, principal component analysis;
VIS/NIR, visible-near infrared/ near-infrared spectroscopy; WS, white
striping; PC, principal component.In this analysis, 2PCs for VIS, NIR and VIS/NIR region explained 99%, 100%, and 98%
of the variance, respectively. Our findings showed that PCA had high performance in
separating normal turkey breast meat from abnormal meat (moderate and severe). These
results were in agreement with previous studies where VIS/NIR spectroscopy with PCA
was used to separate poultry and meat products into different categories (Wold et al., 2017).In conclusion, VIS/NIR spectroscopy is considered a quick, safe and nondestructive
technique which is very suitable for online control for meat defects. The findings
of this study showed that VIS/NIR spectroscopy was satisfactory to differentiate
normal from severe WS turkey fillets. Moreover, the results open a wide door for
using a portable VIS/NIR technique in the turkey industry. Further studies with a
high number for samples are recommended to confirm the ability of VIS/NIR combined
MVDA techniques to differentiate normal turkey breast meat samples from defect
WS.
Authors: G Baldi; F Soglia; M Mazzoni; F Sirri; L Canonico; E Babini; L Laghi; C Cavani; M Petracci Journal: Animal Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tinne Monteyne; Renaat Coopman; Antoine S Kishabongo; Jonas Himpe; Bruno Lapauw; Samyah Shadid; Elisabeth H Van Aken; Darja Berenson; Marijn M Speeckaert; Thomas De Beer; Joris R Delanghe Journal: Clin Chem Lab Med Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 3.694
Authors: Martin J Oates; Nawaf Abu-Khalaf; Carlos Molina-Cabrera; Antonio Ruiz-Canales; Jose Ramos; Brian W Bahder Journal: Biosensors (Basel) Date: 2020-11-23
Authors: Ryley J Vanderhout; Emily M Leishman; Heather Hiscock; Emhimad A Abdalla; Bayode O Makanjuola; Jeff Mohr; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek; Shai Barbut; Benjamin J Wood; Christine F Baes; Nienke van Staaveren Journal: Animals (Basel) Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 2.752