| Literature DB >> 31970329 |
Yeongkwon Yun1, Boin Lee2, Kimun Kwon1, Sejoo Kang1, Eunmi Oh2, Young Min Choi2.
Abstract
The objectives of this study was to compare palatability changes of the longissimus thoracis (LT) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles of Hanwoo steers from different beef quality grades (1+ and 1) during 28 d of wet-aging in order to improve the utilization of the VL muscle as a steak. The VL muscle showed a higher collagen content and a lower intramuscular fat content than the LT muscle (p<0.05). As expected, the Warner-Bratzler shear force value was greater in the LT 1 grade (LT-1) muscle than the LT-1+ muscle (p<0.05); whereas no difference was observed between the grades in the VL muscle at 24 h postmortem. Compared to 0 d of aging, tenderness scores significantly increased after 14 and 21 d of aging in the LT and VL muscles, respectively (p<0.05). Additionally, there was no difference in tenderness score between the VL-1+ aged for 21 d and the LT-1 at 24 h postmortem, although tenderness score was greater in the LT than the VL at each period (p<0.05). Moreover, the VL-1+ steak exhibited a higher tenderness score than the VL-1 steak at 21 and 28 d of aging (p<0.05). On the other hand, the effect of aging time on juiciness and flavor in the VL muscle was somewhat limited unlike the LT muscle. Taken together, the VL muscle requires a longer aging time than the LT muscle to improve consumer preference. Considering the tenderness, using a higher quality grade for aging is more useful in the VL muscle. © Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources.Entities:
Keywords: beef quality grade; longissimus thoracis muscle; sensory quality; vastus lateralis muscle; wet-aging
Year: 2020 PMID: 31970329 PMCID: PMC6957446 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2019.e78
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 2636-0772
Comparison of meat quality and chemical characteristics between longissimus thoracis (LT) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles from different quality grades (1+ and 1) at 24 h postmortem
| Muscle | LT Muscle | VL Muscle | SEM | Level of significance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade | 1+ | 1 | 1+ | 1 | M | G | M×G | |
| Muscle pHu | 5.36[ | 5.37[ | 5.47[ | 5.50[ | 0.10 | * | NS | NS |
| Lightness (L*) | 41.1[ | 39.2[ | 36.6[ | 37.1[ | 0.57 | *** | NS | * |
| Redness (a*) | 22.3 | 22.1 | 23.5 | 23.1 | 0.60 | NS | NS | NS |
| Yellowness (b*) | 10.6 | 9.94 | 9.98 | 9.73 | 0.37 | NS | NS | NS |
| Chemical analysis | ||||||||
| Intramuscular fat (%) | 19.8[ | 15.9[ | 10.8[ | 11.1[ | 1.52 | *** | NS | NS |
| Collagen (%) | 0.18[ | 0.13[ | 0.39[ | 0.31[ | 0.05 | *** | NS | NS |
| Myoglobin (mg/g) | 6.39[ | 6.29[ | 6.84[ | 6.97[ | 0.28 | * | NS | NS |
Different superscripts in the same row represent significant differences (p<0.05).
p<0.05, *** p<0.001.
M, muscle; G, grade; NS, not significant.
Comparison of cooking loss between longissimus thoracis (LT) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles from different quality grades (1+ and 1) during postmortem wet-aging
| Aging period | LT muscle | VL muscle | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1+ | 1 | 1+ | 1 | ||
| 0 | 14.9[ | 16.7[ | 28.7[ | 29.5[ | 0.80 |
| 7 | 16.4[ | 18.6[ | 25.0[ | 24.5[ | 0.90 |
| 14 | 18.3[ | 22.4[ | 31.8[ | 29.2[ | 0.81 |
| 21 | 20.7[ | 21.4[ | 26.7[ | 24.2[ | 0.98 |
| 28 | 21.6[ | 22.2[ | 28.4[ | 28.5[ | 1.00 |
Different superscripts in the same row represent significant differences (p<0.05).
Different superscripts in the same column represent significant differences (p<0.05).
Fig. 1.Comparison of Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) value between longissimus thoracis (LT) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles from different quality grades (1+ and 1) during postmortem wet-aging.
Bars indicate standard errors of means. a-iDifferent superscripts represent significant differences (p<0.05).
Fig. 2.Comparison of palatability characteristics, including tenderness, juiciness, and flavor intensity, between longissimus thoracis (LT) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles from different quality grades (1+ and 1) during postmortem wet-aging.
Bars indicate standard errors of means. a-jDifferent superscripts represent significant differences (p<0.05).