| Literature DB >> 31970085 |
Dongfang Dai1,2, Xiaohui Zhao3, Xiaoqin Li1, Yongqian Shu4, Bo Shen5, Xiaofeng Chen4, Deyu Chen2, Deqiang Wang1,4.
Abstract
Purpose: The effect of microsatellite instability (MSI) on the response to radiotherapy remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the MSI status and the outcomes of gastric cancer (GC) treated by surgical resection with or without postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: adjuvant therapy; chemoradiotherapy; gastric cancer; microsatellite instability; tumor hypoxia
Year: 2020 PMID: 31970085 PMCID: PMC6960096 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Patient characteristics according to MSI status.
| <65 | 39 (54.9) | 15 (83.3) | 0.028 | 70 (44.3) | 10 (23.3) | 0.012 | 49 (50.0) | 16 (40.0) | 0.286 |
| ≥65 | 32 (45.1) | 3 (16.7) | 88 (55.7) | 33 (76.7) | 49 (50.0) | 24 (60.0) | |||
| Female | 16 (22.5) | 6 (33.3) | 0.343 | 56 (35.4) | 24 (54.5) | 0.022 | 25 (25.5) | 14 (35.0) | 0.261 |
| Male | 55 (77.5) | 12 (66.7) | 102 (64.6) | 20 (45.5) | 73 (74.5) | 26 (65.0) | |||
| Non-antrum | 46 (64.8) | 8 (44.4) | 0.115 | 105 (69.1) | 21 (48.8) | 0.014 | 50 (51.0) | 10 (25.0) | 0.005 |
| Antrum | 25 (35.2) | 10 (55.6) | 47 (30.9) | 22 (51.2) | 48 (49.0) | 30 (75.0) | |||
| I/II | 32 (45.1) | 12 (66.7) | 0.102 | 59 (37.8) | 13 (30.2) | 0.359 | 50 (51.0) | 18 (45.0) | 0.521 |
| III | 39 (54.9) | 6 (33.3) | 97 (62.2) | 30 (69.8) | 48 (49.0) | 22 (55.0) | |||
| ADC (IT/NOS) | 54 (76.1) | 18 (100.0) | 0.021 | 120 (76.9) | 35 (79.5) | 0.713 | 79 (80.6) | 37 (92.5) | 0.083 |
| MAC/SRCC/OT | 17 (23.9) | 0 (0.0) | 36 (23.1) | 9 (20.5) | 19 (19.4) | 3 (7.5) | |||
| IB/II | 25 (35.2) | 7 (38.9) | 0.772 | 88 (55.7) | 23 (52.3) | 0.686 | 52 (53.1) | 26 (65.0) | 0.199 |
| III | 46 (64.8) | 11 (61.1) | 70 (44.3) | 21 (47.7) | 46 (46.9) | 14 (35.0) | |||
| Untreated | 24 (33.8) | 6 (33.3) | 0.970 | 118 (74.7) | 33 (75.0) | 0.966 | 56 (57.1) | 31 (77.5) | 0.025 |
| Treated | 47 (66.2) | 12 (66.7) | 40 (25.3) | 11 (25.0) | 42 (42.9) | 9 (22.5) | |||
According to available information.
AHJU, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; ACRG, Asian Cancer Research Group; MSS, microsatellite stability; MSI, microsatellite instability; ADC, adenocarcinoma; IT, intestinal; NOS, not otherwise specified; MAC, mucinous adenocarcinoma; SRCC, signet ring cell carcinoma; OT, others.
Figure 1Overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with resected gastric cancer based on microsatellite instability (MSI) status. AHJU, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; ACRG, Asian Cancer Research Group; MSS, microsatellite stability.
Figure 2Overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with resected gastric cancer based on microsatellite instability (MSI) and treatment status. AHJU, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; ACRG, Asian Cancer Research Group; MSS, microsatellite stability.
Multivariate analyses of variables associated with overall survival in patients with resected MSS GC.
| Chemoradiotherapy (treated vs. untreated) | 0.30 (0.13–0.67) | 0.004 |
| TNM stage (III vs. IB/II) | 3.04 (1.12–8.24) | 0.029 |
| Chemoradiotherapy (treated vs. untreated) | 0.29 (0.12–0.71) | 0.006 |
| Histology grade (III vs. I/II) | 2.46 (1.22–4.96) | 0.012 |
| Chemoradiotherapy (treated vs. untreated) | 0.35 (0.18–0.68) | 0.002 |
| Age (≥65 vs. <65 years) | 1.64 (0.89–3.01) | 0.110 |
| TNM stage (III vs. IB/II) | 2.33 (1.30–4.18) | 0.005 |
| Chemoradiotherapy (treated vs. untreated) | 0.28 (0.18–0.44) | <0.001 |
| Age (≥65 vs. <65 years) | 1.31 (0.90–1.91) | 0.162 |
| Histology grade (III vs. I/II) | 1.36 (0.94–1.97) | 0.107 |
| TNM stage (III vs. IB/II) | 2.14 (1.47–3.12) | <0.001 |
Variables were adopted for their prognostic significance by univariate analysis.
MSS, microsatellite stability; GC, gastric cancer; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; AHJU, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; ACRG, Asian Cancer Research Group.
Figure 3Overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with resected gastric cancer based on treatment status and TNM stage, which was further stratified by microsatellite instability (MSI) status. AHJU, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; ACRG, Asian Cancer Research Group; MSS, microsatellite stability.
Figure 4Pathway enrichment analysis and tumor hypoxia scoring. (A) A clustered heat map of the differentially expressed genes between MSI and MSS GC of stage Ib/II in ACRG. (B) The most significantly enriched signaling pathways in GSEA. (C) Enrichment plots for pathways of pyrimidine metabolism and one carbon pool by folate. (D) The mRNA expression of thymidylate synthetase (TYMS) in stage Ib/II GC is significantly higher in the MSI subtype than that in the MSS subtype in both the TCGA and ACRG cohorts. (E,F) The differential hypoxia scores in ACRG (E) and TCGA (F) between MSI and MSS GC of stage Ib/II shown by clustered heat maps and direct comparisons in each individual signature (authors are shown). ACRG, Asian Cancer Research Group; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; MSI, microsatellite instability; MSS, microsatellite stability; GSEA, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis; NSE, normalized enrichment score.