Literature DB >> 31970044

Operative Field Debris Often Rises to the Level of the Surgeon's Face Shield During Spine Surgery: Are Orthopedic Space Suits a Reasonable Solution?

Christopher R Cook1, Tara Gaston2, Barrett Woods3, Fabio Orozco3, Alvin Ong3, Kris Radcliff3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study intended to identify debris in the spine surgical field that frequently rises to the level of the surgeon's face during several different elective spine procedures. Unlike other areas of orthopedic surgery where infection risk is of high concern, in spine surgery the surgical team usually uses a nonsterile face mask instead of a protective space suit with a sterile face shield. It is possible that blood or bone burr particles striking the surgeon's face mask represent a potential source of infection if they ricochet back into the operative field.
METHODS: We reviewed 46 consecutive, elective spine surgeries between May 2015 and August 2015 from a single-surgeon practice. For each surgery, every member of the surgical team wore sterile (space suit) personal protective equipment. After each procedure, the face shield was carefully inspected by 2 members of the surgical team to identify patient blood, tissue, or bone burr dust present on the face shield.
RESULTS: The rate of surgeon face shield debris inspected for each case overall was 38/46 (83%). The rate of first assistant face shield debris inspected per case was 16/46 (35%). The scrub technician had a 0% rate of face mask debris on inspection. The highest debris exposure rates occurred with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (100%), open laminectomy and fusions (100%), and anterior cervical discectomy and fusions 43/46 (93%).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a high rate of blood and tissue debris contact that occurs during spine surgery, and it is procedure dependent. Spine surgeons may consider using sterile shields particularly in high-risk cases to protect themselves and their patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contamination; debris; eye protection; face shield; space suit; sterility; surgical site infection

Year:  2019        PMID: 31970044      PMCID: PMC6962009          DOI: 10.14444/6067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  29 in total

1.  The influence of surgical hoods and togas on airborne particle concentration at the surgical site: an experimental study.

Authors:  P D McGovern; M Albrecht; S K Khan; S D Muller; M R Reed
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 1.601

Review 2.  What is new in the diagnosis and prevention of spine surgical site infections.

Authors:  Kris E Radcliff; Alexander D Neusner; Paul W Millhouse; James D Harrop; Christopher K Kepler; Mohammad R Rasouli; Todd J Albert; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  The Gown-glove Interface Is a Source of Contamination: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  James F Fraser; Simon W Young; Kimberly A Valentine; Nicholas E Probst; Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Unexpected positive cultures in presumed aseptic revision spine surgery using sonication.

Authors:  M Pumberger; J Bürger; P Strube; D Akgün; M Putzier
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Environmental and body contamination through aerosols produced by high-speed cutters in lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  M Nogler; C Lass-Flörl; M Ogon; E Mayr; C Bach; C Wimmer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Bacterial wound contamination during simple and complex spinal procedures. A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Christina M Arnaoutoglou; Angelos N Politis; Nikolaos A Batzaleksis; Pavlos G Katonis; Theodore A Xenakis
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 7.  Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Paul A Anderson; Jason W Savage; Alexander R Vaccaro; Kristen Radcliff; Paul M Arnold; Brandon D Lawrence; Mohammed F Shamji
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Implant contamination during spine surgery.

Authors:  Jesse E Bible; Kevin R O'Neill; Colin G Crosby; Jonathan G Schoenecker; Matthew J McGirt; Clinton J Devin
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  An update on modifiable factors to reduce the risk of surgical site infections.

Authors:  Jason W Savage; Paul A Anderson
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Bacterial shedding in common spine surgical procedures: headlamp/loupes and the operative microscope.

Authors:  Bradley K Weiner; William B Kilgore
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Are facemasks a priority for all staff in theatre to prevent surgical site infections during shortages of supply? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ben A Marson; Simon Craxford; Ana M Valdes; Benjamin J Ollivere
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.392

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.