| Literature DB >> 31969953 |
Tuba Selçuk Can1, Behice K Yilmaz1, Sevim Özdemir1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Quadriceps fat pad is located posterior to the quadriceps tendon. Increased signal intensity of this fat pad is seen on routine knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations, but the exact mechanism and related pathologies are not clear. In this study we aimed to evaluate the relationship between MRI signal intensity and morphological features of quadriceps fat pad, as well as various pathologies of the patellofemoral joint.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; knee; quadriceps fat pad; suprapatellar fat pad
Year: 2019 PMID: 31969953 PMCID: PMC6964324 DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2019.89196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pol J Radiol ISSN: 1733-134X
Figure 1Quadriceps fat pad signal intensity grading. Quadriceps fat pad borders are indicated by white dotted line. A) Grade 1: slightly increased signal intensity. B) Grade 2: Signal intensity similar to cartilage. Also, there is indentation to the prefemoral fat pad. C) Grade 3: Signal intensity more than the cartilage
Figure 234-year-old man with increased quadriceps fat pad signal intensity. Sagittal proton-weighted magnetic resonance imaging showing quadriceps fat pad dimensions: a – anteroposterior, b – oblique, c – craniocaudal
Figure 341-year-old woman. Midsagittal T1W magnetic resonance imaging slice. Insall-Salvati ratio; patellar tendon length/patellar height (b/a) is shown
Figure 4Same patient as in Figure 2. Right knee axial proton-weighted magnetic resonance imaging slice passing through femoral condyles. Patellar facet dimensions: lateral (l) and medial (m). Femoral trochlear depth measurement: Line from the floor of femoral trochlea perpendicular to the reference line extracted from the average of the lines from the most anterior parts of lateral and medial femoral trochlea perpendicular to the reference line (a + b/2 – c)
The relationship between the severity of quadriceps fat pad oedema and the trochlear groove angle, trochlear depth, and trochlear facet ratio (p > 0.05)
| The severity of quadriceps fat pad oedema | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | |||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Trochlear groove angle | 139.69 | 5.78 | 139.97 | 6.44 | 138.21 | 8.41 | 0.754 |
| The depth of trochlear groove | 3.83 | 1.42 | 4.41 | 1.01 | 4.80 | 1.18 | 0.152 |
| Trochlear medial/lateral facet ratio | 0.56 | 0.12 | 0.54 | 0.12 | 0.55 | 0.12 | 0.635 |
The relationship between the quadriceps fat pad oedema and patellar localisation, meniscal pathology, and chondromalacia
| Severity of quadriceps fat pad oedema | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | |||||
| % | % | % | |||||
| Patellar localization | 0.136 | ||||||
| Normal | 5 | 38.5 | 6 | 17.6 | 6 | 42.9 | |
| Alta + Baja | 8 | 61.5 | 28 | 82.4 | 8 | 57.1 | |
| Lateral meniscus | 0.999 | ||||||
| Normal | 12 | 92.3 | 30 | 88.2 | 13 | 92.9 | |
| Degenerated + tear | 1 | 7.7 | 4 | 11.8 | 1 | 7.1 | |
| Medial facet chondromalacia | 0.104 | ||||||
| (–) | 12 | 92.3 | 27 | 79.4 | 8 | 57.1 | |
| (+) (1-4) | 1 | 7.7 | 7 | 20.6 | 6 | 42.9 | |
| Lateral facet chondromalacia | 0.965 | ||||||
| (–) | 7 | 53.8 | 18 | 52.9 | 8 | 57.1 | |
| (+) (1-4) | 6 | 46.2 | 16 | 47.1 | 6 | 42.9 | |
Frequency of various pathologies, their percentages, and p-values
| Pathology | Number | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trochlear groove angle (hypoplasia) | 10 | 16.4 | < 0.0001 |
| The depth of trochlear sulcus (shallow) | 11 | 18 | < 0.0001 |
| Patella facet asymmetry | 9 | 14.8 | < 0.0001 |
| Patellar subluxation | 5 | 8.2 | < 0.0001 |
| Patella morphology 2 and 3 | 37 | 60.7 | 0.096 |
| Patella Alta and patella Baja | 44 | 72.1 | 0.001 |
| At least one pathology | 55 | 90.2 | < 0.0001 |
| Normal | 6 | 9.8 |