| Literature DB >> 31969119 |
Panpan Ye1,2, Jia Xu1, Yueqiu Luo1,2, Zhitao Su1,2, Ke Yao3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Entities:
Keywords: Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy; BEST1; Metabolomics; Mutation
Year: 2020 PMID: 31969119 PMCID: PMC6977271 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-020-0951-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Fig. 1Clinical features of the ARB patients in the family. a Color funduscopy (CF) of the proband was normal, overall. b Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) image of the proband showed annular hyperfluorescence around the posterior pole. c OCT results of the proband revealed bilateral cystoid macular edema with subretinal fluid. d The affected younger sister’s ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) results showed a shallower anterior chamber depth, and half of the anterior chamber angles were closed. e The affected younger sister’s fundus fluorescence angiography (FFA) revealed mild fluorescence leakage beneath the macula
Fig. 2A novel autosomal recessive mutation in the BEST1 gene c.646G > A (p.V216I) was identified in the family. a The results of family separation and analysis showed that the proband (V6), her fifth sister (V5), and her younger sister (V7) carry the homozygous variation. The grandmother (III-1), father (IV1), mother (IV2), and son (VI1) of the proband, her fourth sister (V4), and the son (VI2) of her younger sister carry the heterozygosity. The first sister (V1), the second sister (V2), and the third sister (V3) of the proband carry the wild-type gene. b Pedigree. Square symbols denote males, circle symbols denote females, solid symbols indicate the affected, open symbols indicate the unaffected, slash symbols indicate the deceased, an arrow below the symbol indicates the proband, = indicates consanguinity, and + indicates the wild type
Fig. 3Conservation analysis using the UCSC Genome Browser database. a Schematic representation of amino acid sequence alignment around the p.V216I variant in different species. b DNA WebLogo of the variant regions. c A conservational logo of amino acids of BEST1 protein position 216 (Valine) generated by WebLogo online tool
Fig. 4Metabolic profile of ARB patients. a Distribution of metabolites in the whole family. b The significantly differential expressed metabolites (fold change > 1.2, P < 0.05). c KEGG einrichment analysis of differential expressed metabolites between ARB patients (A/A, n = 2) and their wild-type sisters (G/G, n = 3) and between ARB patients (A/A, n = 2) and the heterozygosity group (A/G, n = 2). The size of the bubble represents the number of genes in each pathway
Numbers of significantly differential expressed metabolites (DEM) (P < 0.05, VIP > 1.0)
| Comparison | Total metabolites (n) | DEM (n) | Up-regulated DEM (n) | Down-regulated DEM (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fold change > 1.2 | ||||
| A_A.vs.G_G_pos | 990 | 16 | 8 | 8 |
| A_G.vs.G_G_pos | 990 | 24 | 17 | 7 |
| A_A.vs.A_G_pos | 990 | 18 | 14 | 4 |
| A_A.vs.G_G_neg | 670 | 25 | 3 | 22 |
| A_G.vs.G_G_neg | 670 | 19 | 6 | 13 |
| A_A.vs.A_G_neg | 670 | 14 | 4 | 10 |
| Fold change > 2.0 | ||||
| A_A.vs.G_G_pos | 990 | 10 | 5 | 5 |
| A_G.vs.G_G_pos | 990 | 15 | 11 | 4 |
| A_A.vs.A_G_pos | 990 | 9 | 5 | 4 |
| A_A.vs.G_G_neg | 670 | 23 | 1 | 22 |
| A_G.vs.G_G_neg | 670 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| A_A.vs.A_G_neg | 670 | 12 | 3 | 9 |