Literature DB >> 31968199

UTILITY OF AFIRMA GENE EXPRESSION CLASSIFIER FOR EVALUATION OF INDETERMINATE THYROID NODULES AND CORRELATION WITH ULTRASOUND RISK ASSESSMENT: SINGLE INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE.

Rahaf Sultan, Shiri Levy, Ebru Sulanc, Mahalakshmi Honasoge, Sudhaker D Rao.   

Abstract

Objective: We assessed our experience with Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) combined with sono-graphic risk assessment, using both the American Thyroid Association (ATA) and the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) in evaluating indeterminate thyroid nodules.
Methods: We identified 98 patients with 101 nodules who had a second fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) between January 1, 2014, and September 30, 2017, and sent to Veracyte for cytopathology and subsequent Afirma GEC testing. A second FNA biopsy was performed if the initial cytopathology was either Bethesda III or IV (n = 94) or nondiagnostic (n = 7). We correlated cytopathology, histopathology, and Afirma GEC results with sonographic risk assessment using both the ATA system and TI-RADS.
Results: The mean age of the cohort was 57.4 ± 12.3 years; 84% women and 60% white. Repeat FNA was benign in 51 of 101 nodules, and of the remaining 50 nodules, 18 (36%) were GEC-benign and 32 (64%) GEC-suspicious. Eighteen of the 32 GEC-suspicious nodules underwent surgery with the following results: 7 benign (39%), 1 follicular thyroid carcinoma (6%), 6 follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer (33%), and 4 noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features (22%). The malignancy rate among the surgical cohort was 39% (without noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features [NIFTP]) and 61% (with NIFTP) and about 50% and 20% of this group scored in the high suspicion category by ATA and TR5 by TI-RADS, respectively.
Conclusion: Afirma GEC was useful in avoiding surgery in one-third of indeterminate nodules and performed similarly to ATA and TI-RADS. However, the use of echogenicity in scoring may underestimate the risk of malignancy in patients with indeterminate nodules. Abbreviations: ATA = American Thyroid Association; AUS = Atypia of Undetermined Significance; FLUS = Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance; FN = follicular neoplasm; FNA = fine needle aspiration; FTC = follicular thyroid cancer; FVPTC = follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer; GEC = Gene Expression Classifier; ND = nondiagnostic; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features; TI-RADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; TR = TI-RADS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31968199     DOI: 10.4158/EP-2019-0350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Pract        ISSN: 1530-891X            Impact factor:   3.443


  3 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Characterization of Thyroid Follicular Lesions in the Era of "Next-Generation" Techniques.

Authors:  Esther Diana Rossi; Pietro Locantore; Carmine Bruno; Marco Dell'Aquila; Pietro Tralongo; Mariangela Curatolo; Luca Revelli; Marco Raffaelli; Luigi Maria Larocca; Liron Pantanowitz; Alfredo Pontecorvi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 6.055

2.  Features of Cytologically Indeterminate Molecularly Benign Nodules Treated With Surgery.

Authors:  Mayumi Endo; Kyle Porter; Clarine Long; Irina Azaryan; John E Phay; Matthew D Ringel; Jennifer A Sipos; Fadi Nabhan
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Thyroseq v3, Afirma GSC, and microRNA Panels Versus Previous Molecular Tests in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Alina Silaghi; Vera Lozovanu; Carmen Emanuela Georgescu; Raluca Diana Georgescu; Sergiu Susman; Bogdana Adriana Năsui; Anca Dobrean; Horatiu Silaghi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.555

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.