Literature DB >> 31967823

TopModel: Template-Based Protein Structure Prediction at Low Sequence Identity Using Top-Down Consensus and Deep Neural Networks.

Daniel Mulnaes1, Nicola Porta1, Rebecca Clemens2, Irina Apanasenko3,4, Jens Reiners2,5, Lothar Gremer3,4, Philipp Neudecker3,4, Sander H J Smits2,5, Holger Gohlke1,4,6.   

Abstract

Knowledge of protein structures is essential to understand proteins' functions, evolution, dynamics, stabilities, and interactions and for data-driven protein- or drug design. Yet, experimental structure determination rates are far exceeded by that of next-generation sequencing, resulting in less than 1/1000th of proteins having an experimentally known 3D structure. Computational structure prediction seeks to alleviate this problem, and the Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) has shown the value of consensus and meta-methods that utilize complementary algorithms. However, traditionally, such methods employ majority voting during template selection and model averaging during refinement, which can drive the model away from the native fold if it is underrepresented in the ensemble. Here, we present TopModel, a fully automated meta-method for protein structure prediction. In contrast to traditional consensus and meta-methods, TopModel uses top-down consensus and deep neural networks to select templates and identify and correct wrongly modeled regions. TopModel combines a broad range of state-of-the-art methods for threading, alignment, and model quality estimation and provides a versatile workflow and toolbox for template-based structure prediction. TopModel shows a superior template selection, alignment accuracy, and model quality for template-based structure prediction on the CASP10-12 datasets compared to 12 state-of-the-art stand-alone primary predictors. TopModel was validated by prospective predictions of the nisin resistance protein (NSR) protein from Streptococcus agalactiae and LipoP from Clostridium difficile, showing far better agreement with experimental data than any of its constituent primary predictors. These results, in general, demonstrate the utility of TopModel for protein structure prediction and, in particular, show how combining computational structure prediction with sparse or low-resolution experimental data can improve the final model.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31967823     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  7 in total

1.  Cell Type-Dependent Escape of Capsid Inhibitors by Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVcpz.

Authors:  Augustin Penda Twizerimana; Rachel Scheck; Daniel Becker; Zeli Zhang; Marianne Wammers; Leandro Avelar; Marc Pflieger; Dieter Häussinger; Thomas Kurz; Holger Gohlke; Carsten Münk
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  A MademoiseLLE domain binding platform links the key RNA transporter to endosomes.

Authors:  Senthil-Kumar Devan; Stephan Schott-Verdugo; Kira Müntjes; Lilli Bismar; Jens Reiners; Eymen Hachani; Lutz Schmitt; Astrid Höppner; Sander Hj Smits; Holger Gohlke; Michael Feldbrügge
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.020

3.  Protein engineering for feedback resistance in 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase.

Authors:  Kumaresan Jayaraman; Natalia Trachtmann; Georg A Sprenger; Holger Gohlke
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 5.560

Review 4.  Protein-protein interaction prediction with deep learning: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Farzan Soleymani; Eric Paquet; Herna Viktor; Wojtek Michalowski; Davide Spinello
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 6.155

5.  Characterization of the nucleotide-binding domain NsrF from the BceAB-type ABC-transporter NsrFP from the human pathogen Streptococcus agalactiae.

Authors:  Fabia Furtmann; Nicola Porta; Dai Tri Hoang; Jens Reiners; Julia Schumacher; Julia Gottstein; Holger Gohlke; Sander H J Smits
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Foamy Viruses, Bet, and APOBEC3 Restriction.

Authors:  Ananda Ayyappan Jaguva Vasudevan; Daniel Becker; Tom Luedde; Holger Gohlke; Carsten Münk
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.048

7.  The Bacteroidetes Aequorivita sp. and Kaistella jeonii Produce Promiscuous Esterases With PET-Hydrolyzing Activity.

Authors:  Hongli Zhang; Pablo Perez-Garcia; Robert F Dierkes; Violetta Applegate; Julia Schumacher; Cynthia Maria Chibani; Stefanie Sternagel; Lena Preuss; Sebastian Weigert; Christel Schmeisser; Dominik Danso; Juergen Pleiss; Alexandre Almeida; Birte Höcker; Steven J Hallam; Ruth A Schmitz; Sander H J Smits; Jennifer Chow; Wolfgang R Streit
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.