Literature DB >> 31967667

Feeding ecology has a stronger evolutionary influence on functional morphology than on body mass in mammals.

David M Grossnickle1.   

Abstract

Ecological specialization is a central driver of adaptive evolution. However, selective pressures may uniquely affect different ecomorphological traits (e.g., size and shape), complicating efforts to investigate the role of ecology in generating phenotypic diversity. Comparative studies can help remedy this issue by identifying specific relationships between ecologies and morphologies, thus elucidating functionally relevant traits. Jaw shape is a dietary correlate that offers considerable insight on mammalian evolution, but few studies have examined the influence of diet on jaw morphology across mammals. To this end, I apply phylogenetic comparative methods to mandibular measurements and dietary data for a diverse sample of mammals. Especially powerful predictors of diet are metrics that capture either the size of the angular process, which increases with greater herbivory, or the length of the posterior portion of the jaw, which decreases with greater herbivory. The size of the angular process likely reflects sizes of attached muscles that produce jaw movements needed to grind plant material. Further, I examine the impact of feeding ecology on body mass, an oft-used ecological surrogate in macroevolutionary studies. Although body mass commonly increases with evolutionary shifts to herbivory, it is outperformed by functional jaw morphology as a predictor of diet. Body mass is influenced by numerous factors beyond diet, and it may be evolutionarily labile relative to functional morphologies. This suggests that ecological diversification events may initially facilitate body mass diversification at smaller taxonomic and temporal scales, but sustained selective pressures will subsequently drive greater trait partitioning in functional morphologies.
© 2020 The Authors. Evolution © 2020 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feeding ecology; functional morphology; jaw morphology; mammal macroevolution; phylogenetic comparative methods; trait partitioning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31967667     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  4 in total

Review 1.  Cheliceral chelal design in free-living astigmatid mites.

Authors:  Clive E Bowman
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Pinching or stinging? Comparing prey capture among scorpions with contrasting morphologies.

Authors:  Luis Fernando García; Juan Carlos Valenzuela-Rojas; Julio César González-Gómez; Mariángeles Lacava; Arie van der Meijden
Journal:  J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Topographically distinct adaptive landscapes for teeth, skeletons, and size explain the adaptive radiation of Carnivora (Mammalia).

Authors:  Graham J Slater
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  Jaw shape and mechanical advantage are indicative of diet in Mesozoic mammals.

Authors:  Nuria Melisa Morales-García; Pamela G Gill; Christine M Janis; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-02-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.