Arnold Steckel1,2, Katalin Uray2, Gergo Kalló3, Éva Csosz3, Gitta Schlosser2,4. 1. Hevesy György PhD School of Chemistry, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/A, 1117, Hungary. 2. MTA-ELTE Research Group of Peptide Chemistry, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/A, 1117, Hungary. 3. Proteomics Core Facility, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, 4032, Hungary. 4. Department of Analytical Chemistry, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/A, 1117, Hungary.
Abstract
Tandem mass spectrometry is an indispensable tool in proteomics used for protein sequencing and quantitation. On the basis of the sequential fragments usually generated from peptide ions via collision-induced dissociation, electron-transfer dissociation, or a combination of the two, probabilistic database search engines could be used for the identification of the peptides. The correct localization of posttranslational modifications (PTMs) poses a more challenging problem than the general identification of proteins. Histones are involved in the regulation of DNA transcription via the wealth of PTMs on their N-terminal tail. In this study, we analyzed the histone H4 peptide SGRGK incorporating four different posttranslational modifications: citrullination, acetylation, phosphorylation, and arginine methylation at various positions. The pentapeptides model the enzymatic cleavage of the N-terminal tail of human histone H4 protein by LysC protease. Fragmentation of the peptides was investigated using higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), electron-transfer dissociation (ETD), and electron-transfer higher-energy collisional dissociation (EThcD) on an ultrahigh resolution and mass accuracy instrument. We found that while all three techniques have their unique characteristics, advantages, and pitfalls, EThcD generated the most fragment ion-rich spectra. Despite potential ambiguities regarding exact fragment identities, full sequence coverage and PTM mapping may also be achievable. We also found novel neutral losses from the charge-reduced precursors characteristic to citrullination in ETD and EThcD which may be used in proteomic applications. N-Terminal acetylation and arginine methylation could also be confirmed by their characteristic neutral losses from the charge-reduced precursors.
Tandem mass spectrometry is an indispensable tool in proteomics used for protein sequencing and quantitation. On the basis of the sequential fragments usually generated from peptide ions via collision-induced dissociation, electron-transfer dissociation, or a combination of the two, probabilistic database search engines could be used for the identification of the peptides. The correct localization of posttranslational modifications (PTMs) poses a more challenging problem than the general identification of proteins. Histones are involved in the regulation of DNA transcription via the wealth of PTMs on their N-terminal tail. In this study, we analyzed the histone H4peptide SGRGK incorporating four different posttranslational modifications: citrullination, acetylation, phosphorylation, and arginine methylation at various positions. The pentapeptides model the enzymaticcleavage of the N-terminal tail of humanhistone H4 protein by LysC protease. Fragmentation of the peptides was investigated using higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), electron-transfer dissociation (ETD), and electron-transfer higher-energy collisional dissociation (EThcD) on an ultrahigh resolution and mass accuracy instrument. We found that while all three techniques have their unique characteristics, advantages, and pitfalls, EThcD generated the most fragment ion-rich spectra. Despite potential ambiguities regarding exact fragment identities, full sequence coverage and PTM mapping may also be achievable. We also found novel neutral losses from the charge-reduced precursors characteristic to citrullination in ETD and EThcD which may be used in proteomic applications. N-Terminal acetylation and arginine methylation could also be confirmed by their characteristic neutral losses from the charge-reduced precursors.
Entities:
Keywords:
acetylation; arginine methylation; citrullination; collision-induced dissociation; electron-transfer dissociation; histone code; posttranslational modifications; tandem mass spectrometry
Sequencing of peptides and detailed characterization of their posttranslational
modifications (PTMs) could usually be carried out by tandem mass spectrometry using
collisional activation (CID), activation by electron-transfer (ETD), or activation by
electron transfer followed by collisional activation (EThcD).Collisional activation (CID, or HCD in Orbitrap instruments) is an activation method that
uses collisions with inert gases to impart enough energy to the precursors for
fragmentation.[1] It is the best option when peptides are relatively
small (<20 amino acids), not highly charged (z ≤ 3), and devoid
of labile PTMs (e.g., phosphorylation). Product ions mostly include y and b type ions[2] originating from amidebond cleavages as well as neutral losses of small
molecules that may or may not be characteristic to modifications present on the peptides.
Despite some of its disadvantages, CID is still widely used due to the well-understood
mechanism of the processes, reliability, and good sequence coverage of the peptides.ETD was developed by Syka et al.[3] and involves the transfer of
electron(s) to multiply charged peptide species to initiate fragmentation. Being only
efficient for peptides with higher charge densities, it is usually used for larger peptides
or even proteins. Sequence coverage may also be higher than that of CID. ETD is applied as a
complementary method to CID as it yields c and z type ions originating from
N–Cα bond cleavages. Neutral losses are usually less frequent in
ETD spectra. PTMs are preferentially preserved in ETD as opposed to CID. There is no
fragmentation at the N-terminus of proline residues in ETD.EThcD was first introduced by Frese et al.[4] In EThcD, the transfer of
electrons is followed by the collisional activation of all the products generated in the
first step. The overall process yields b, y, c, and z ions and numerous neutral losses. It
has been reported as the best method of choice for the analysis of phosphopeptides and
glycopeptides[5] due to the wealth of fragments generated, which
considerably facilitate the localization of PTMs.Histone-mediated gene regulation is one of the main fields where PTMs are of high
importance.[6] Acetylation of the N-terminus[7] or
lysine residues,[8] methylation of arginine[9] and lysine
residues,[10] and phosphorylation of serine residues[11]
have been known a long time along with the citrullination site at Arg-3[12]
of the histone H4N-terminal tail. While acetylation on the side chains in CID results in a
mass increment of the corresponding fragments carrying the modification and may result in
characteristic iminium ions, an N-terminal acetylation may give rise to b1 ions
which are not stable in their original forms.[13] No characteristic side
chain loss attributed to acetylation has been previously described. On the other hand,
neutral losses of methylamine, N-methylcarbodiimide, and
N-methylguanidine as well as some iminium ion related fragments are
reported to be characteristic to methylated arginine residues in CID MS/MS.[14] Phosphorylated residues are highly prone to lose phosphoric acid—or
even worse, transfer it to other unmodified hydroxyl side chains upon
CID.[15,16] In ETD,
these side chain modifications remain preferentially intact.[17] The
presence of fragments corresponding to the neutral loss of isocyanic acid is selective for
(homo)citrullinated residues in CID,[18,19] although no distinctive side chain loss has been reported for
citrullination in ETD. Moreover, we previously reported a cleavage preference at the
C-termini of citrulline residues in the collision-induced tandem mass spectra of
citrullinated peptides (citrulline effect).[20,21]Histone modifications have been extensively studied in the past decade. Bottom-up,
middle-down, and top-down approaches using CID/HCD and ETD techniques have all been applied
to investigate the histone code.[22−28] However, little work has explored the detailed and
systematic fragmentation of small model peptidescontaining citrulline residues as well.
Furthermore, we hypothesized that there should be additional uncharacterized neutral loss
ions that may be useful for PTM localization or confirmation.In this study, we synthesized the humanhistone H4N-terminal pentapeptide SGRGK and its
combinatorial variants bearing various PTMs: Ac-SGRGK, pSGRGK, Ac-pSGRGK, SGXGK, Ac-SGXGK,
pSGXGK, Ac-pSGXGK, SGR(Me)GK, Ac-SGR(Me)GK, pSGR(Me)GK, Ac-pSGR(Me)GK, where X stands for
the one-letter abbreviation for citrulline residues. Utilizing the current, commercially
available activation techniques—namely, HCD, ETD, and EThcD—our aim was to
examine the possible differences of the various tandem mass spectra. We took care to observe
the neutral losses that could be used for improving PTM localization.
Experimental Procedures
Model pentapeptides were manually synthesized using the standard Fmoc/tBu
strategy of solid phase peptide synthesis on Wang-resin resulting in peptides with free
carboxy termini. PTMs—except for acetylation—were introduced by incorporating
modified residues (Fmoc-Arg(Me, Pbf)-OH and Fmoc-Ser(PO(OBzl)OH)-OH)) into the sequence
during synthesis. Acetylation was performed with acetic anhydride in basicconditions. All
amino acids were purchased from Iris Biotech GmbH (Marktredwitz, Germany). After cleavage by
trifluoroacetic acid in the presence of phenol, anisole, triisopropylsilane, and distilled
water as scavengers, the resulting peptides were purified by HPLC-UV and were
freeze-dried.Prior to MS analysis, the freeze-dried samples were dissolved in acetonitrile–water
(1:1, v/v), containing 0.1 v/v% formic acid. Final concentration of the peptides was 10
μM. These solutions were directly injected to the electrospray source of an Orbitrap
Fusion Tribrid instrument (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a flow rate of 5
μL/min. Resolution was set to 120 000. An isolation width of 2
m/z was applied for MS/MS. For ETD and EThcD
experiments, the ion activation time was set to 50 ms. Normalized collision energies (NCE)
were set between 15 and 35% for HCD and EThcD. Collision energy dependence studies were
carried out on a Q-Exactive Focus Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap instrument (Thermo Scientific,
Bremen, Germany) in the range of 10–48 eV with 2 eV steps at a resolution of 70 000.
Raw data were visualized and annotated by mMass.[29]
Results
HCD Experiments
We previously demonstrated that the citrulline effect may substantially alter fragment
ion distributions in CID.[20,21] Therefore, in these experiments, we acquired tandem spectra at
different collision energies to examine the effect of the various PTMs. Single stage MS
data are summarized in Table . The results of
collision energy dependence studies are summarized for doubly protonated precursor ions in
Figure and Supplementary Figures S1a–l in the case of all the 12 histone
peptides. For ease of interpretation, only b and y type ions are depicted, other
noncharacteristic fragments (peaks corresponding to an ammonia or water loss) are omitted.
Singly and doubly protonated fragments of the same type are cumulated. Intact b ions could
not be detected in the case of phosphopeptides, only fragments with a phosphoric acid
loss. These are shown as biP in the figures.
Table 1
List of the Twelve Pentapeptide Sequences Originated from Human H4 Histone
Protein
peptide sequence
measured [M + H]+
calculated
[M + H]+
measured
[M + 2H]2+
calculated
[M + 2H]2+
SGRGK
504.2889
504.2889
252.6480
252.6481
Ac-SGRGK
546.2997
546.2994
273.6530
273.6534
pSGRGK
584.2552
584.2552
292.6307
292.6312
Ac-pSGRGK
626.2653
626.2658
313.6362
313.6365
SGR(Me)GK
518.3042
518.3045
259.6557
259.6559
Ac-SGR(Me)GK
560.3147
560.3151
280.6608
280.6612
pSGR(Me)GK
598.2703
598.2709
299.6385
299.6391
Ac-pSGR(Me)GK
640.2808
640.2814
320.6437
320.6443
SGXGK
505.2723
505.2729
253.1394
253.1401
Ac-SGXGK
547.2831
547.2835
274.1447
274.1454
pSGXGK
585.2383
585.2392
293.1231
293.1232
Ac-pSGXGK
627.2493
627.2498
314.1282
314.1285
Figure 1
HCD curves of appearance for the fragments originating from doubly protonated
precursors of citrulline containing peptides (first column),
NG-methylarginine containing peptides (second column) and arginine
containing reference peptides (third column). SGZGK (A–C), Ac-SGZGK
(D–F), pSGZGK (G–I), Ac-pSGZGK (J–L). Z = X (first column), Z =
R(Me) (second column), and Z = R (third column). BiP fragments denote
orthophosphoric acid loss from the corresponding bi ions.
HCDcurves of appearance for the fragments originating from doubly protonated
precursors of citrullinecontaining peptides (first column),
NG-methylargininecontaining peptides (second column) and argininecontaining reference peptides (third column). SGZGK (A–C), Ac-SGZGK
(D–F), pSGZGK (G–I), Ac-pSGZGK (J–L). Z = X (first column), Z =
R(Me) (second column), and Z = R (third column). BiP fragments denote
orthophosphoric acid loss from the corresponding bi ions.Our results show that the y2 ion intensity is significantly higher for
citrullinecontaining peptidescompared to the argininecontaining variants. This
phenomenon can be explained by the citrulline effect. In addition, y2 intensity
is usually higher than or as intense as that of other sequential fragments in its own
spectrum. Conversely, we could not find any remarkable difference in the cleavage
preference between NG-methylarginine and argininecontaining histone peptidesbesides a more intense y4 ion for SGR(Me)GK vs SGRGK (Figure
B–C).For acetylated peptides, we observed b1 ions which are otherwise unstable if
the N-terminus is unmodified. NG-Methylargininecontaining
peptidesusually displayed at least two out of three previously described neutral
losses[14] at the same time, namely, the loss of methylamine (31.042
Da), N-methylguanidine (74.071 Da) and
N-methylcarbodiimide (57.045). These could be used for confirmation of
arginine methylation. By using these characteristic ions, false positive identification
rates may also be reduced.
ETD Experiments
Electron-transfer dissociation is usually used for larger or highly charged peptides. For
low charges, CID or HCD outperforms ETD in terms of sequence coverage.[30] In our experiments, doubly charged ions were selected for fragmentation using ETD. In
these cases, charge-reduced precursors could not be detected; their characteristicammonia
and other previously described losses could be observed. As it is expected, however, the
most intense peaks in the ETD spectra correspond to precursor ions in the spectra due to
the low efficiency of electron transfer to low-charged species. In these experiments, we
mostly observed c and ż type fragments with a relatively lower occurrence of y and
ȧ ions (Supplementary Figure S2(a–l)). The latter ones denote the radical
type a ion that contains an extra hydrogen atom. Interestingly, we detected a neutral loss
of 44.01 Da in the ETD MS/MS spectrum of the citrullinated SGXGK peptide possibly
originating from the undetected charge-reduced precursor (Figure A). In the ETD spectrum of the unmodified SGRGK peptide, we
obtained a similar loss that is 43.03 Da (Figure B). The difference between the two losses is the same as the increment for
citrullinated versus unmodified arginine residues suggesting that these neutral losses can
be associated with citrulline and arginine side chains. Arginine side chains may produce
relatively strong fragment ion peaks corresponding to neutral losses in ETD. One of these
possible reactions is the above-mentioned 43.03 Da loss which is suggested by Hunt et
al.[31] to be carbamimidoyl radical
(NH=•C-NH2). We propose that the loss of 44.01 Da
could be thus identified as the carbamoyl radical
(O=•C-NH2) [Scheme ]. Zolg et al. investigated the neutral losses characteristic to citrullination
in HCD and ETD and found none for the latter technique.[32] Our results
show that the carbamoyl radical loss could, however, be selective for
citrulline-containing peptides. The loss of CO2 which is frequently observed in
ETD spectra has a very similar transition (43.990 Da). CO2 and carbamoyl loss
differentiation therefore may be hard for higher charge-state precursors or instruments
with lower resolution and mass accuracy. All citrulline-containing histone peptides in
this study showed this fragmentation route as opposed to their arginine-containing
variants. Therefore, we screened ETD spectra for additional selective losses and found
that although being much less intense, the elimination of urea
(H2N-CO-NH2) could also be indicative of citrullination which is
analogous to the arginine-selective carbamidine loss
(H2N–C(=•NH)-NH2) that was
previously described only with a formula of CH5N3.[33] However, urea loss is less frequently observed for citrullinated peptides.
As expected, phosphate groups remained mostly intact in our ETD experiments. Almost all
acetylated peptides displayed a relatively strong loss of 59.04 Da which could be
attributed to the elimination of H3C–C(-OH)=•NH
(ethanimidic acid) from the N-terminus (Figure ). This could be elucidated by the original fragmentation mechanism proposed for
electron-transfer dissociation by Syka et al.,[3] if it is applied for
the amide group of the acetylated N-terminus. A neutral loss with the same formula has
already been reported for asparagine and glutamine side chains[33] as
well. NG-methylarginine residues also produced selective
elimination products including CH3–NH2 (31.042 Da) or
HN=•C-NH–CH3 (57.045 Da) (Figure ),[34] which are analogous to
previously reported losses of NH3 (17.027 Da) and
HN=•C-NH2 (43.030 Da) characteristic to arginine
residues.
Figure 2
ETD tandem mass spectrum of doubly protonated SGXGK (A) and SGRGK (B). Precursor ions
are denoted as “2+”, and the undetected charge-reduced precursors are
only signed as M. Hydrogen atom loss is depicted as ’. Neutral losses of
ammonia (*), CO (#), and the citrulline-selective carbamoyl radical (currency sign)
and urea loss (u) are also shown for SGXGK along with arginine-selective carbamimidoyl
radical (×) and carbamidine (Euro sign) for SGRGK. For ease of interpretation,
precursor intensities are reduced to 1/100 of their original value.
Scheme 1
Suggested Mechanism for the Elimination of Carbamoyl Radical from Citrulline Side
Chains in ETD Fragmentation
Figure 3
ETD tandem mass spectrum of doubly protonated Ac-SGRGK. Precursor ion is denoted as
“2+”, the undetected charge-reduced precursor is only signed as M.
Hydrogen atom loss is depicted as ’. Neutral losses of ammonia (*) and the
arginine-selective carbamimidoyl radical (×) are also shown along with
ethanimidic acid (^) loss characteristic to N-terminally acetylated
peptides. For ease of interpretation, precursor intensity is reduced to 1/100 of its
original value.
Figure 4
ETD tandem mass spectrum of doubly protonated SGR(Me)GK. Precursor ion is denoted as
“2+”, and the undetected charge-reduced precursor is only signed as M.
Hydrogen atom loss is depicted as ’. Neutral losses of ammonia (*) and the
NG-methylarginine-selective methylamine (÷) and
N-methylcarbodiimide losses (§) are also shown. For ease of
interpretation, precursor intensity is reduced to 1/100 of its original value.
ETD tandem mass spectrum of doubly protonated SGXGK (A) and SGRGK (B). Precursor ions
are denoted as “2+”, and the undetected charge-reduced precursors are
only signed as M. Hydrogen atom loss is depicted as ’. Neutral losses of
ammonia (*), CO (#), and the citrulline-selective carbamoyl radical (currency sign)
and urea loss (u) are also shown for SGXGK along with arginine-selective carbamimidoyl
radical (×) and carbamidine (Euro sign) for SGRGK. For ease of interpretation,
precursor intensities are reduced to 1/100 of their original value.ETD tandem mass spectrum of doubly protonated Ac-SGRGK. Precursor ion is denoted as
“2+”, the undetected charge-reduced precursor is only signed as M.
Hydrogen atom loss is depicted as ’. Neutral losses of ammonia (*) and the
arginine-selective carbamimidoyl radical (×) are also shown along with
ethanimidic acid (^) loss characteristic to N-terminally acetylated
peptides. For ease of interpretation, precursor intensity is reduced to 1/100 of its
original value.ETD tandem mass spectrum of doubly protonated SGR(Me)GK. Precursor ion is denoted as
“2+”, and the undetected charge-reduced precursor is only signed as M.
Hydrogen atom loss is depicted as ’. Neutral losses of ammonia (*) and the
NG-methylarginine-selective methylamine (÷) and
N-methylcarbodiimide losses (§) are also shown. For ease of
interpretation, precursor intensity is reduced to 1/100 of its original value.
EThcD Experiments
EThcD tandem mass spectra obtained for the histone H4 pentapeptides very much resemble
HCD tandem mass spectra of singly charged precursors at high energies (Supplementary Figure S3(a–l)). In these cases, however, fragmentation
efficiency seems much higher, and the whole m/z region
is populated more evenly by fragment ions compared to HCD. Neutral losses are prevalent
both for precursors and their fragments. Another feature is that the higher the proton
mobility of a given precursor, the higher the similarity of a given EThcD spectrum to its
HCDcounterpart. On the other hand, the lower the proton mobility, the higher is the
similarity of the given EThcD spectra to its ETD counterpart. In the case of EThcD
spectra, however, differentiation between two fragments is often ambiguous. For example,
the mass of a bi ion and a ci-NH3 are exactly the same,
or the loss of a HNCO molecule from a [M + H]+ type precursor is the same as
that of a O=•C-NH2 from a singly charged,
charged-reduced precursor [M + 2H]+•. In general, several NH3
and even H2O losses could be observed for fragments of which the latter is less
frequently seen in HCD generated spectra. The mass difference between NH3 and
even H2O losses is 0.9840 Da, which is identical to the mass difference for
deamidation and also citrullination. As examples, EThcD spectra of the doubly charged
precursor of SGXGK and SGRGK peptides at 30% NCE are depicted in Figure
. As NCE only compensates for mass difference and charge
state differences, the lower efficacy of SGRGK fragmentation may be attributed to superior
basicity of arginine residues, thus decreasing proton mobility.[35] The
citrulline effect is very pronounced as the peak corresponding to the y2 ion is
the second highest in the spectrum of the citrullinated SGXGK peptide. In the upper
m/z region, the ETD-selective losses could also be
identified from the charge-reduced precursor (which is in itself not detectable) including
NH3, carbamoyl radical, and urea along with a hydroxyl radical loss possibly
from the serine side chain. Some of these losses could also be originated from the [M +
H]+, which is formed by hydrogen atom abstraction from the charge-reduced
precursor ([M + 2H]+˙). The presence of both processes could be inferred
from the unusual “isotope” distributions (e.g., the peak of NH3
loss, see Figure S4). Another complicating feature in the spectra worth mentioning is
the proper identification of z and ż ions which only differ by an
H• radical (1.0078). Differentiation of hydrogen abstraction and
isotope peaks may be hard. Very high resolution, sophisticated software annotation and
high mass accuracy are needed, especially when low-mass posttranslational modifications
(citrullination, deamidation) are also present. Usually, all fragments bearing citrulline
residues display the loss of HNCO which is rarely seen in simple HCD experiments
(Figure S5). This wealth of fragments may also be a disadvantage as it may
increase the number of false positive identifications. Therefore, great care must be
taken, and manual inspection is highly recommended during evaluation when fragments other
than the intact fragment ions (b, y, c) are considered. However, the selective losses in
the higher m/z region that can also be found in ETD
spectra are reliable—at least in cases where only either citrulline or arginine is
in the peptide sequence. For peptidescontaining one or more arginine and citrulline, the
difference between the above-mentioned characteristic peaks is 0.9840 Da, which may also
indicate the presence of citrullination beside the HNCO/carbamoyl radical loss.
Figure 5
EThcD tandem mass spectrum of doubly protonated SGXGK (A) and SGRGK (B) histone
peptides. Precursor ion is denoted as “2+”, the undetected
charge-reduced precursor is only signed as M. Hydrogen atom loss is depicted as
’. Neutral losses of ammonia (*), water (deg), the citrulline-selective
carbamoyl radical (currency sign) or isocyanic acid (@) and urea (u), and the
arginine-selective carbamimidoyl radical (×) and carbamidine (Euro sign)
eliminations are also shown.
EThcD tandem mass spectrum of doubly protonated SGXGK (A) and SGRGK (B) histone
peptides. Precursor ion is denoted as “2+”, the undetected
charge-reduced precursor is only signed as M. Hydrogen atom loss is depicted as
’. Neutral losses of ammonia (*), water (deg), the citrulline-selective
carbamoyl radical (currency sign) or isocyanic acid (@) and urea (u), and the
arginine-selective carbamimidoyl radical (×) and carbamidine (Euro sign)
eliminations are also shown.In the case of Ac-SGXGK peptide, the highest sequential peak was attributed to the
citrulline effect, while the second one—comparable to this—was the
y4 ion (Figure ). Cleavage
preference at the N-terminus of glycine residues in mobile and partially mobile sequences
has been reported earlier for CID spectra.[36] Characteristic,
modification-selective neutral losses in the upper m/z
region are present indicating citrullination and acetylation in this histone peptide. The
cleavage preference C-terminal to citrulline is also pronounced for the pSGXGK peptidecontaining a phosphorylated serine residue, while y2 intensity is much lower
for pSGR(Me)GK (Figure ). “False HNCO
losses” from fragments still appeared for peptides that do not comprise citrulline
residues (see Figure S6). The peaks corresponding to these fragments were mostly
associated with b3 peaks of methyl-arginine and arginine-containing peptides.
We also found a false positive b2-HNCO peak for the peptide Ac-SGXGK but none
for other Cit-peptides. On the other hand, HNCO loss from precursor ions was only observed
for citrulline-containing peptidesbeing faithful reporters of this modification. ETD is
often mentioned as a truly complementary technique of HCD. Even in the case of EThcD, it
can be seen that a cleavage C-terminal to arginine or glycine—which are normally
disfavored upon HCD—is prevalent for Arg-containing peptides (e.g., pSGRGK,
Ac-SGRGK). In the case of Cit-containing peptides, EThcD fragmentation was still highly
influenced by the citrulline effect. The MS/MS spectra of Ac-pSGXGK contains mainly
iminium ions, suggesting much greater proton mobility. Yet, the citrulline effect and
characteristic neutral losses are substantial in this case as well.
Figure 6
EThcD tandem mass spectrum of doubly protonated Ac-SGXGK histone peptide. The
undetected charge-reduced precursor is only signed as M. Hydrogen atom loss is
depicted as ’. Neutral losses of ammonia (*), water (deg), the
citrulline-selective carbamoyl radical (currency sign) or isocyanic acid (@) are also
shown. Note that the spectrum is very similar to an HCD one; radical losses could be
explained by even-electron fragmentation from M’ as well.
Figure 7
EThcD tandem mass spectrum of doubly protonated pSGXGK (A) and pSGR(Me)GK (B) histone
peptides. The undetected charge-reduced precursor is only signed as M. Hydrogen atom
loss is depicted as ’. Neutral losses of ammonia (*), water (deg), the
citrulline-selective carbamoyl radical (currency sign), or isocyanic acid (@) as well
as the NG-methylarginine-selective methylamine (÷)
and N-methylcarbodiimide losses (§) are also shown. Note that
all bi related fragments may represent ci* ones, and all
zi related fragments may represent yi* as well.
EThcD tandem mass spectrum of doubly protonated Ac-SGXGK histone peptide. The
undetected charge-reduced precursor is only signed as M. Hydrogen atom loss is
depicted as ’. Neutral losses of ammonia (*), water (deg), the
citrulline-selective carbamoyl radical (currency sign) or isocyanic acid (@) are also
shown. Note that the spectrum is very similar to an HCD one; radical losses could be
explained by even-electron fragmentation from M’ as well.EThcD tandem mass spectrum of doubly protonated pSGXGK (A) and pSGR(Me)GK (B) histone
peptides. The undetected charge-reduced precursor is only signed as M. Hydrogen atom
loss is depicted as ’. Neutral losses of ammonia (*), water (deg), the
citrulline-selective carbamoyl radical (currency sign), or isocyanic acid (@) as well
as the NG-methylarginine-selective methylamine (÷)
and N-methylcarbodiimide losses (§) are also shown. Note that
all bi related fragments may represent ci* ones, and all
zi related fragments may represent yi* as well.
Discussion
In this study, the effect of the presence of multiple posttranslational modifications
(N-terminal acetylation, serine phosphorylation, and argininecitrullination/methylation) on
the tandem mass spectra of human H4 histone peptides was examined by different activation
methods including higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) with collision energy
dependence, electron-transfer dissociation (ETD), and electron-transfer higher-energy
collisional dissociation (EThcD).In HCD spectra, the citrulline effect—i.e., the cleavage preference at the
C-terminus of citrulline residues—was observed for Cit-peptides in
a relatively wide collision energy range. Compared to the arginine-containing reference
peptides, peaks corresponding to these fragments were significantly more intense. Isocyanic
acid (HNCO) loss was also prominent from precursors (usually 10–20%, but up to 100%
depending on proton mobility), but sometimes less prevalent and reliable for fragments
(usually 1–30%).ETD spectra of these doubly charged peptides provided some unexpected and characteristic
high m/z peaks corresponding to radical losses from the
charge-reduced precursors which could be utilized to confirm citrullination. The loss of a
carbamoyl radical (•CO-NH2) from citrulline side
chains—analogous to carbamimidoyl radical
(HN=•C-NH2) elimination of arginine proposed by Hunt
et al.—is described here for the first time along with carbamide loss. These products
may not be intense when the charge state of the precursor is higher and may be suppressed by
arginine side chain losses if arginine is also present in the sequence but are useful for
confirmation of citrullination for lower-charged species. We also found the side chain
losses associated with Arg-methylation
(HN=•C-NH–CH3 and
CH3–NH2).[36] Acetylation could also be
easily identified as the loss of C2H5NO (more precisely
H3C–C(-OH)=NH in this case) can only originate from acetylation in
the absence of Asn and Gln residues. Being a backbone cleavage, this peak usually tends to
be rather intense compared to other neutral losses.EThcD spectra of these histone peptides yielded the most numerous fragments for
citrullinated peptides including the (•CO-NH2)/HNCO losses from
(charge-reduced) precursors, HNCO losses from almost all fragments that bears a citrulline
residue and citrulline effect in the case of Cit-peptides. Methylamine and
N-methylcarbodiimide losses were also prevalent from the precursors of
Arg(Me) containing peptides. Phosphorylated and acetylated peptides displayed their
characteristic elimination reactions, too. These neutral loss intensities were very variable
being usually ∼1–20% but orthophosphoric acid loss in some cases reached
∼70–80%. EThcD not only improved neutral losses’ yield for all types of
PTMs but sequential fragment yields as well. Some fragments could not be differentiated from
each other in EThcD, but most of these products refer to the same sequential information,
potentially improving identification. However, the overlapping of isotope peaks due to the
immense amount of neutral losses may pose a concern for a software-based annotation. The
technique has its own pitfalls as well due to the high probability of generating combined
losses having the same formulas but inferring to structurally different ions. If this is the
case for such simple systems, fragmenting larger sized peptides would increase spectral
complexity and may lead to erroneous assignments especially for quantitative studies. Thus,
while EThcD was found to be beneficial for the localization of larger and labile
modifications[4] (e.g., glycosylation and phosphorylation), care must be
taken when applied to small modifications (e.g., citrullination) and large precursor charge
states.Nevertheless, we suggest using EThcD for analyzing these PTMs for low mass peptidesby
restricting the automatic annotation to b, y, and c sequential ions and the above-mentioned
characteristic neutral losses from precursors only, followed by manual inspection of the
remaining product ion neutral losses, if necessary. In this case, a complete sequence
coverage as well as exact PTM site determination becomes possible without significantly
increasing false identifications. Another option is to use HCD for confirmation of the
modifications and subsequent ETD fragmentation for unambiguous sequence information as was
used previously for citrullinated peptides.[37]
Authors: Cynthia M Barber; Fiona B Turner; Yanming Wang; Kirsten Hagstrom; Sean D Taverna; Sahana Mollah; Beatrix Ueberheide; Barbara J Meyer; Donald F Hunt; Peter Cheung; C David Allis Journal: Chromosoma Date: 2004-05-07 Impact factor: 4.316
Authors: Arnold Steckel; Katalin Uray; Lilla Turiák; Ágnes Gömöry; László Drahos; Ferenc Hudecz; Gitta Schlosser Journal: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Tingting Jiang; Michael E Hoover; Matthew V Holt; Michael A Freitas; Alan G Marshall; Nicolas L Young Journal: Proteomics Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Xibei Dang; Jenna Scotcher; Si Wu; Rosalie K Chu; Nikola Tolić; Ioanna Ntai; Paul M Thomas; Ryan T Fellers; Bryan P Early; Yupeng Zheng; Kenneth R Durbin; Richard D Leduc; Jeremy J Wolff; Christopher J Thompson; Jingxi Pan; Jun Han; Jared B Shaw; Joseph P Salisbury; Michael Easterling; Christoph H Borchers; Jennifer S Brodbelt; Jeffery N Agar; Ljiljana Paša-Tolić; Neil L Kelleher; Nicolas L Young Journal: Proteomics Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 3.984