| Literature DB >> 31967320 |
Joan Weiss1, Nina Tumosa1, Elyse Perweiler2, Mary Ann Forciea3, Toni Miles4, Ellen Blackwell5, Susan Tebb6, Daniel Bailey1, Scott A Trudeau7, Mary Worstell8.
Abstract
The US Department of Health and Human Services and the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, through private sector support, sponsored the National Research Summit on Dementia Care: Building Evidence for Services and Supports (Summit) in 2017. Various workgroups were asked to address topics of interest in dementia care and develop recommendations addressing the goals of the Summit. Workforce education and training was identified to be a key issue. As a result, a Workforce Development Workgroup (the Workgroup) was created and addressed two of the Summit's goals. The first goal is to improve the quality of care and support provided to persons living with dementia and those who care for them. The second goal is to accelerate the development, evaluation, translation, implementation, and scaling-up of evidence-based and evidence-informed services for persons living with dementia, their families, and caregivers. In this article, the Workgroup identified gaps in educating and training a dementia-capable workforce. The Workgroup consisted of an interprofessional team with expertise in dementia workforce development from academia, professional organizations, and the federal government. Four recommendations are presented concerning research topics that will advance the education and training of a dementia-capable workforce, which includes health professions students, faculty, practitioners, direct care workers, persons living with dementia, and those who care for them. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:625-629, 2020.Entities:
Keywords: dementia education and training; research recommendations; workforce gaps
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31967320 PMCID: PMC7384174 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16341
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc ISSN: 0002-8614 Impact factor: 5.562
Recommendations for Areas of Critical Workforce Gaps to Increase the Size and Level of Expertise of a Dementia‐Capable Workforce
| Area of Critical Workforce Gaps | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| 1. Recruitment and retention of a dementia‐capable workforce |
Recruitment and retention of a dementia‐capable workforce requires organizations to collaborate, identify, and meet workforce dementia education and training needs. |
|
2. Financing and cost of workforce education and training | The emerging education and training needs of the dementia care workforce must be cost‐effective. |
| 3. Interprofessional education and training for care coordination and management of dementia care |
Research must show how to improve the delivery of dementia care and services, increase satisfaction with care, and reduce costs to improve care coordination and care transitions. |
| 4. Translation and implementation of effective dementia care | Evidence‐based practices of effective care must be broadly disseminated to translate and implement effective care. |
Figure 1Four areas of critical workforce gaps in dementia education and training.
Research Focus Areas and Recommendations Regarding Areas of Critical Workforce Gaps in Dementia Education and Training
| Critical Workforce Gaps | Recommended Research Focus Areas |
|---|---|
| Recruitment and retention of a dementia‐capable workforce |
Identify the minimum competencies. Identify necessary content of training programs and curricula. Determine how to recruit a workforce reflective of the population receiving care and services. Determine what demographics impact the workforce. Study the impact of dementia certification. Study the effect of raising the required level of knowledge on the ability of the workforce to obtain training. Study how direct service workers can be motivated, compensated, and empowered to become caregivers. Identify ways to recruit and retain caregivers and clinician educators. |
| Financing and cost of workforce education and training |
Investigate the costs of updating curricula, providing additional training, and having individual specialty certifications. Evaluate the cost savings/cost benefits of providing dementia‐capable training. Compare costs associated with dementia certification vs a learning certificate in dementia care. Identify the impacts of expanding options for paid caregiving in Medicaid and for self‐directed service delivery. Study the impact of current technologies on caregiving. Ascertain what persons impacted by dementia want from home‐monitoring technologies. Determine the effectiveness of dementia‐capable vs nondementia‐capable professionals. |
| Care coordination and management of dementia care |
Collect baseline information on interprofessional education and training needs of the workforce. Determine how persons affected by dementia define “high‐quality” care. Examine strategies to introduce advanced care planning to all. Determine the critical elements of goal‐of‐care conversations. Determine workforce‐training needs in technology applications and data management. Determine ways to integrate caregivers into the interprofessional team. Investigate how to train the workforce to cover care transitions. Identify the ethical considerations of the use of technology. Identify the uses and limitations of technology. Explore the use of technology in providing continuing education. Utilize technology to support data‐driven clinical decision making to contain costs. |
| Translation and implementation of effective dementia care |
Determine the effects of translational research on the adoption of experiential and collaborative practice and team‐based learning. Ascertain effective ways to deliver research outcomes. Identify the characteristics of an effective dissemination and implementation plan. Identify impacts of educational interventions for disseminating and implementing research. Determine how to evaluate press and social media reports for reliability. Establish a process for vetting reliable internet sites. |