Rohit Loomba1, Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri2, Arun Sanyal3, Naga Chalasani4, Anna Mae Diehl5, Norah Terrault6, Kris Kowdley7, Srinivasan Dasarathy8, David Kleiner9, Cynthia Behling1, Joel Lavine10, Mark Van Natta11, Michael Middleton1, James Tonascia11, Claude Sirlin1. 1. NAFLD Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA. 2. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO. 3. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA. 4. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN. 5. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC. 6. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 7. Liver Center, Department of Medicine, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA. 8. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. 9. Laboratory of Pathology, The National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. 10. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY. 11. Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Emerging data from a single-center study suggests that a 30% relative reduction in liver fat content as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from baseline may be associated with histologic improvement in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). There are limited multicenter data comparing an active drug versus placebo on the association between the quantity of liver fat reduction assessed by MRI-PDFF and histologic response in NASH. This study aims to examine the association between 30% relative reduction in MRI-PDFF and histologic response in obeticholic acid (OCA) versus placebo-treated patients in the FLINT (farnesoid X receptor ligand obeticholic acid in NASH trial). APPROACH AND RESULTS: This is a secondary analysis of the FLINT trial including 78 patients with MRI-PDFF measured before and after treatment along with paired liver histology assessment. Histologic response was defined as a 2-point improvement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score without worsening of fibrosis. OCA (25 mg orally once daily) was better than placebo in improving MRI-PDFF by an absolute difference of -3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], -6.5 to -0.2%, P value = 0.04) and relative difference of -17% (95% CI, -34 to 0%, P value = 0.05). The optimal cutoff point for relative decline in MRI-PDFF for histologic response was 30% (using Youden's index). The rate of histologic response in those who achieved less than 30% decline in MRI-PDFF versus those who achieved a 30% or greater decline in MRI-PDFF (MRI-PDFF responders) relative to baseline was 19% versus 50%, respectively. Compared with MRI-PDFF nonresponders, MRI-PDFF responders demonstrated both a statistically and clinically significant higher odds 4.86 (95% CI, 1.4-12.8, P value < 0.009) of histologic response, including significant improvements in both steatosis and ballooning. CONCLUSION: OCA was better than placebo in reducing liver fat. This multicenter trial provides data regarding the association between 30% decline in MRI-PDFF relative to baseline and histologic response in NASH.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Emerging data from a single-center study suggests that a 30% relative reduction in liver fat content as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from baseline may be associated with histologic improvement in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). There are limited multicenter data comparing an active drug versus placebo on the association between the quantity of liver fat reduction assessed by MRI-PDFF and histologic response in NASH. This study aims to examine the association between 30% relative reduction in MRI-PDFF and histologic response in obeticholic acid (OCA) versus placebo-treated patients in the FLINT (farnesoid X receptor ligand obeticholic acid in NASH trial). APPROACH AND RESULTS: This is a secondary analysis of the FLINT trial including 78 patients with MRI-PDFF measured before and after treatment along with paired liver histology assessment. Histologic response was defined as a 2-point improvement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score without worsening of fibrosis. OCA (25 mg orally once daily) was better than placebo in improving MRI-PDFF by an absolute difference of -3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], -6.5 to -0.2%, P value = 0.04) and relative difference of -17% (95% CI, -34 to 0%, P value = 0.05). The optimal cutoff point for relative decline in MRI-PDFF for histologic response was 30% (using Youden's index). The rate of histologic response in those who achieved less than 30% decline in MRI-PDFF versus those who achieved a 30% or greater decline in MRI-PDFF (MRI-PDFF responders) relative to baseline was 19% versus 50%, respectively. Compared with MRI-PDFF nonresponders, MRI-PDFF responders demonstrated both a statistically and clinically significant higher odds 4.86 (95% CI, 1.4-12.8, P value < 0.009) of histologic response, including significant improvements in both steatosis and ballooning. CONCLUSION: OCA was better than placebo in reducing liver fat. This multicenter trial provides data regarding the association between 30% decline in MRI-PDFF relative to baseline and histologic response in NASH.
Authors: Rohit Loomba; Maria Abraham; Aynur Unalp; Laura Wilson; Joel Lavine; Ed Doo; Nathan M Bass Journal: Hepatology Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Stephen A Harrison; Mustafa R Bashir; Cynthia D Guy; Rong Zhou; Cynthia A Moylan; Juan P Frias; Naim Alkhouri; Meena B Bansal; Seth Baum; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Rebecca Taub; Sam E Moussa Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Veeral Ajmera; Charlie C Park; Cyrielle Caussy; Seema Singh; Carolyn Hernandez; Ricki Bettencourt; Jonathan Hooker; Ethan Sy; Cynthia Behling; Ronghui Xu; Michael S Middleton; Mark A Valasek; Claire Faulkner; Emily Rizo; Lisa Richards; Claude B Sirlin; Rohit Loomba Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Christopher D Williams; Joel Stengel; Michael I Asike; Dawn M Torres; Janet Shaw; Maricela Contreras; Cristy L Landt; Stephen A Harrison Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-09-19 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Rohit Loomba; Eric Lawitz; Parvez S Mantry; Saumya Jayakumar; Stephen H Caldwell; Hays Arnold; Anna Mae Diehl; C Stephen Djedjos; Ling Han; Robert P Myers; G Mani Subramanian; John G McHutchison; Zachary D Goodman; Nezam H Afdhal; Michael R Charlton Journal: Hepatology Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Laura E Dichtel; Kathleen E Corey; Melanie S Haines; Mark L Chicote; Allison Kimball; Caitlin Colling; Tracey G Simon; Michelle T Long; Jad Husseini; Miriam A Bredella; Karen K Miller Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 6.134
Authors: Juan P Frías; Jill Maaske; Lisa Suchower; Lars Johansson; Paul D Hockings; Nayyar Iqbal; John P H Wilding Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 6.408
Authors: Giovanni Targher; Kathleen E Corey; Christopher D Byrne; Michael Roden Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Adrian Vilalta; Julio A Gutiérrez; SuZanne Chaves; Moisés Hernández; Silvia Urbina; Marcus Hompesch Journal: Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Date: 2022-04-06
Authors: Jonathan G Stine; Nagambika Munaganuru; Abbey Barnard; Jennifer L Wang; Kellee Kaulback; Curtis K Argo; Siddarth Singh; Kathryn J Fowler; Claude B Sirlin; Rohit Loomba Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 11.382