R K Raghavan1, A C G Heath2, K E Lawrence3, R R Ganta1, A T Peterson4, W E Pomroy5. 1. Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA. 2. Agresearch Ltd., C/O Hopkirk Research Institute, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand. 3. School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. K.Lawrence@massey.ac.nz. 4. Department of Ecology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA. 5. School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Abstract
Although currently exotic to New Zealand, the potential geographic distribution of Amblyomma americanum (L.), the lone star tick, was modelled using maximum entropy (MaxEnt). The MaxEnt model was calibrated across the native range of A. americanum in North America using present-day climatic conditions and occurrence data from museum collections. The resulting model was then projected onto New Zealand using both present-day and future climates modelled under two greenhouse gas emission scenarios, representative concentration pathways (RCP) 4.5 (low) and RCP 8.5 (high). Three sets of WorldClim bioclimatic variables were chosen using the jackknife method and tested in MaxEnt using different combinations of model feature class functions and regularization multiplier values. The preferred model was selected based on partial receiver operating characteristic tests, the omission rate and the lowest Akaike information criterion. The final model had four bioclimatic variables, Annual Mean Temperature (BIO1), Annual Precipitation (BIO12), Precipitation Seasonality (BIO15) and Precipitation of Driest Quarter (BIO17), and the projected New Zealand distribution was broadly similar to that of Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann, New Zealand's only livestock tick, but with a more extensive predicted suitability. The climate change predictions for the year 2050 under both low and high RCP scenarios projected only moderate increases in habitat suitability along the mountain valleys in the South Island. In conclusion, this analysis shows that given the opportunity and license A. americanum could and would successfully establish in New Zealand and could provide another vector for theileriosis organisms.
Although currently exotic to New Zealand, the potential geographic distribution of Amblyomma americanum (L.), the lone star tick, was modelled using maximum entropy (MaxEnt). The MaxEnt model was calibrated across the native range of A. americanum in North America using present-day climatic conditions and occurrence data from museum collections. The resulting model was then projected onto New Zealand using both present-day and future climates modelled under two greenhouse gas emission scenarios, representative concentration pathways (RCP) 4.5 (low) and RCP 8.5 (high). Three sets of WorldClim bioclimatic variables were chosen using the jackknife method and tested in MaxEnt using different combinations of model feature class functions and regularization multiplier values. The preferred model was selected based on partial receiver operating characteristic tests, the omission rate and the lowest Akaike information criterion. The final model had four bioclimatic variables, Annual Mean Temperature (BIO1), Annual Precipitation (BIO12), Precipitation Seasonality (BIO15) and Precipitation of Driest Quarter (BIO17), and the projected New Zealand distribution was broadly similar to that of Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann, New Zealand's only livestock tick, but with a more extensive predicted suitability. The climate change predictions for the year 2050 under both low and high RCP scenarios projected only moderate increases in habitat suitability along the mountain valleys in the South Island. In conclusion, this analysis shows that given the opportunity and license A. americanum could and would successfully establish in New Zealand and could provide another vector for theileriosis organisms.
Entities:
Keywords:
Amblyomma americanum; Ecological niche modelling; MaxEnt; New zealand; Tick
New Zealand’s relative geographic isolation has not prevented the
self- or assisted introduction of many exotic species of plants and animals (McGlone 2006; Williams and Cameron 2006). In fact, deliberate introductions of birds
and mammals were common in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries (Thomson 1922) before the concepts of
extinction, competitive displacement and reduced biodiversity were fully
realised.For a nation that relies heavily on agriculture for economic stability, any
organism that threatens productivity is an anathema. Furthermore, with tourism
recently edging out dairy as New Zealand’s biggest export earner, it is in
the best interests of the country to also promote itself as safe for visitors. This
requires that potential human exposure to parasites and disease organisms is also
kept to a minimum.In an effort to maintain barriers against unwanted organisms, biosecurity
measures are in place such that incoming passengers are screened for unwanted
materials that might introduce exotic diseases and pests. A proportion of aircraft,
ships and shipping containers is also examined and fumigated if necessary.
Surveillance measures annually intercept many potential threats at the border but
only a few organisms have breached it. Mosquitoes, fleas, parasitic mites and ticks
are examples of medical and veterinary arthropod pests that are regularly
encountered, although the only livestock tick in New Zealand, Haemaphysalis
longicornis Neumann, invaded and established long before any
comprehensive quarantine measures were in place (Myers 1924). Of considerable contemporary interest is the finding of
H. longicornis in north-eastern USA (Rainey et al. 2018) showing that it and many other
species of ticks (Burridge 2011) are still
threatening invasion around the globe.The following tick species are listed as notifiable under the New Zealand
Biosecurity (Notifiable organisms) order 2016, Amblyomma spp.,
Dermacentor spp., Rhipicephalus spp.,
Boophilus spp. and Ixodes spp. (exotic). In
recent years at least 24 species of ticks have been intercepted in New Zealand
(Heath 2013), almost equally divided
between humans and companion animals (Heath and
Hardwick 2011) as vehicles of entry. Brown dog tick
[Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille)] is a regular
introduction to New Zealand from around the world, but especially from Australia,
together with the paralysis tick (Ixodes holocyclus Neumann),
although occasional specimens of other tick species from most parts of the planet
have been intercepted (Heath 2013) including
North America. The brown dog-tick has established temporarily in New Zealand on a
few occasions (Heath et al. 1980; Bingham 2011), going through at least one cycle,
but eradication measures have, as far as is known, been completely successful
against such incursions.Potentially, for an exotic tick to establish, a single, invasive ovigerous
female would be sufficient, providing suitable hosts and a favourable bioclimatic
match were available near the point of entry. Alternatively a mix of all stages in
large numbers, or individual adults of both sexes should provide greater certainty
of establishment, again as long as host and microclimatic needs are met. A means of
dispersal beyond the initial entry point is necessary to enhance the invasion
potential. New Zealand has a wide range of avian and mammalian potential tick hosts,
with a smaller number of reptiles. Some of the mammalian species are highly mobile
and have larger ranges than others (Heath
2016), further aiding dispersal from an entry point. As an illustration
of potential host availability, New Zealand has 27 species of widespread terrestrial
mammals (King 2005), within a land area of
268,021 km2. The USA by comparison has 490 species of terrestrial mammals
(Anon 2019) over a land area of 9,834,000
km2. Thus, potential host density comprises one species for each
20,069 km2 in the USA and one host species for each 9927 km2
in New Zealand, almost double the potential USA host density.The New Zealand climate is warm temperate with a fully humid, warm summer;
represented as Cfb in the Köppen–Geiger classification (Maunder 1970) making it suitable for ticks that
inhabit similar regions on the planet at relatively high latitudes, excluding desert
ecosystems. The Köppen–Geiger classification is a widely used climate
classification system in which climates are divided into five main groups
(A–E), in which group C is temperate. The second and third letters further
sub-divide the climate group based on precipitation and temperature patterns,
respectively.Tick species offering the most serious risk to New Zealand are those with
wide host and geographic ranges, and specifically those adapted to cooler or
temperate climates and which are vectors of disease agents of livestock, humans and
wildlife. Many species fit this category, and Heath
(2013) identified 15 of 45 potential invaders in the genera
Amblyomma, Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis and
Ixodes that would seem to be ideally suited to New
Zealand’s suite of hosts and climate factors. However, one species was not
considered in that list (because it was not sympatric with H.
longicornis), but which has come to prominence in recent times is
Amblyomma americanum (L.), although it has been intercepted
only three times at the New Zealand border (Heath
and Hardwick 2011; Rawdon 2019).
With H. longicornis now established in the north-eastern part of
the range of Amb. americanum (Springer et al. 2015; Rainey et al.
2018) a comparative assessment of mutual environmental suitability is
even more cogent.Amblyomma americanum (the lone star tick) is considered one
of the most aggressive tick pests in the United States (Cortinas and Spomer 2013; Stafford et al. 2018). It has a wide distribution along the Atlantic
coast, from New York to Florida and west into Texas and Oklahoma (Childs and Paddock 2003). All stages of the tick readily
feed on people, companion animals, livestock and wildlife. It is particularly
abundant among white-tailed deer, the primary host for adult stage ticks, and has
been implicated as a vector of Ehrlichia chaffeensis (human
monocytic ehrlichiosis pathogen) and E. ewingi (human ewingii
ehrlichiosis pathogen), as well as Franciscella tularensis
(tularemia pathogen) and Heartland virus (Bunyaviridae:
Phlebovirus). These all affect humans. The Southern tick-associated
rash illness (STARI) of humans is linked with A. americanum bites.
The tick also harbours feline cytauxzoonosis parasite (Cytauxzoon
felis) (Farlow et al. 2005;
Reichard et al. 2010; Savage et al. 2013; Raghavan et al. 2016) as well as at least one Theileria
sp. infective for cattle (Chae et al. 1999).
Recently lone-star tick bites have also been linked to α-gal allergy, a
bizarre, recurrent, life-threatening allergic reaction to red meat (Commins et al. 2011). Extensive studies have shown that
A. amer icanum is not a vector for Lyme disease pathogen
(Borrelia burgdorferi) (Stromdahl et al. 2018), however, it may be involved in the transmission
of Rickettsia rickettsii and Rickettsia parkeri
(Berrada et al. 2011; Wright et al. 2015).One effective approach to understand species distribution is through
correlative modelling. (Phillips et al. 2006;
Estrada-Peña and Venzal 2007) and
in recent years maximum entropy (MaxEnt) models have been used successfully to
predict tick distributions, habitat suitability and arthropod vectored disease
transmission (James et al. 2015; Donaldson et al. 2016; Raghavan et al. 2016, 2019; Lawrence et al. 2016b).
Evaluation of the potential for A. americanum to establish in New
Zealand serves as a proxy for many tick species some of which have been considered
in a general sense, based on laboratory and field data (Heath 1979, 1981,
2013).The aim of this study was to model the potential distribution of A.
americanum, in New Zealand using maximum entropy-based ecological niche
modelling and to examine how this potential distribution of A.
americanum could alter under two climate change scenarios.
Materials and methods
To assess the potential distribution of A. americanum in
New Zealand several candidate ecological niche models were first calibrated across
the tick’s current distribution in North America and the best fitting model
transferred to New Zealand’s present-day and future climatic conditions.
Species distribution data
Lone star ticks are widely present in the eastern, south-eastern, and
mid-western United States (Childs and Paddock
2003). Species distribution collection data were obtained from the
Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit (WRBU), based in the Smithsonian Institution,
which included data from the University of Alberta Entomology Collection and the
Australian Museum, Sydney. Occurrence data for A. americanum in
WRBU database includes diverse spatial resolutions. We selected only those
records that had GPS coordinates.The data were checked for positional uncertainty and those records with
an uncertainty > 10,000 m were removed. The selected occurrence data
points were then rarefied to an inter-occurrence separation of > 50 km,
to remove the influence of spatial autocorrelation on model performance (Veloz 2009; Boria et al. 2014). For model construction 50% of the occurrence
data points were used for model calibration and 50% for model evaluation i.e.
the model was constructed using half the data points and its accuracy evaluated
using the other half.
Environmental data
The 19 bioclimatic variables (BIO1–19) available from
the WorldClim (version 2.0) data archive (www.worldclim.org) were used for modelling the ecological niche
and estimating the geographic distribution of lone star ticks. Bioclimatic
variables are summarized raster data (data layers) derived from average monthly
temperature and precipitation values for 1970–2000 and are intended to
approximate climate dimensions that are meaningful to biological species (Fick and Hijmans 2017). In order to match
the uncertainties with occurrence data, climate data at 10-min (~ 17
× ~ 17 km) spatial resolution was used. Four of these data layers
which combine precipitation and temperature information into the same layer
(Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter (BIO8), Mean Temperature of
Driest Quarter (BIO9), Precipitation of Warmest Quarter
(BIO18) and Precipitation of Coldest Quarter (BIO19))
were excluded a priori because these data layers have been shown to have spatial
artefacts that could affect modelling (Escobar
et al. 2014). The relevance of the remaining 15 data layers to the
occurrence data was assessed in the model selection step, described in detail
below.
Ecological niche modelling
The machine-learning technique called maximum entropy modelling, MaxEnt
(v.3.3.3), (Phillips et al. 2004) was
used for estimating the ecological niche of lone star ticks across New Zealand.
The modelling approaches used in this study have been discussed and described in
detail, both in general terms (Peterson et al.
2011) and for specific disease-relevant systems (Peterson 2014). Parametrization of MaxEnt models have
large implications for model outcomes, and one persistent challenge when niche
modelling with MaxEnt is choosing appropriate parameter values. In the past,
this has been largely done “by art” but more recently quantitative
and more robust approaches have been used (Warren et al. 2014; Muscarella et
al. 2014). In the present study, many of the recent advances in model
selection protocols were utilised, as well as those developed by (Peterson et al. 2018).Advantages to model performance has been shown when niche models are
calibrated across areas that are reasonably accessible to a species due to
natural dispersal and other means (Barve et al.
2011; Owens et al. 2013).
Therefore, we calibrated our models across an area representing
‘M’ within 7 degrees of all occurrences in this
study.Eventually it could be possible for A. americanum to
establish in the west coast of N. America, however the museum records at UC
Berkeley and other west coast museums indicated to us that this species is not
present in this region at the present time. Therefore, we did not include these
areas for calculating M. A summary of the model build follows.In all, 285 MaxEnt models were built with five different combinations of
model feature class functions (i.e. linear; linear and quadratic; linear,
quadratic and product; linear, quadratic, product and threshold; and linear,
quadratic, product, threshold and hinge), 19 regularization multiplier (RM)
values (0.1–1 with intervals of 0.1; 1–6 with intervals of 1;
8–10 with intervals of 2; 10–20 with intervals of 5) and three
sets of environmental variables. The RM values determine how snugly the model
response fits to the observations in the environmental space.The three separate sets of bioclimatic variables were selected based on
exploration of variable contributions towards the spatial distribution of
A. americanum via the jackknife procedure (Phillips et al. 2004). Briefly, at each step of the
jackknife procedure different models were built with sets of progressively fewer
variables. At each step the jackknife procedure removed the least contributing
variable(s) for the previous model. The variables included in the final three
variable sets were kept as assessed in our model selection procedure. This
procedure was aimed at building models that (1) were statistically significant,
(2) correctly predicted independent subsets of occurrence data, and (3)
adequately described the complexity of the modelled relationship of occurrences
to the environmental data (Warren and Seifert
2011; Radosavljevic and Anderson
2014).Models were selected using three criteria; first they were separated
based on partial ROC tests (Peterson et al.
2008), removing non-significant models (P >
0.1) from further consideration. Second, the remaining models were filtered by
omission rate, and all models with an omission rate > 0.1 (10%) (Phillips et al. 2006) were considered
inadequate and were removed. In the final undertaking, the models were sorted by
lowest Akaike Information Criterion corrected for small sample sizes (AICc)
(Warren and Seifert 2011) values,
choosing as final models those within 2 AICc units of the minimum among the
significant candidate models. The top model(s) were replicated using the
bootstrap function in MaxEnt, 10 replicate data sets were chosen by sampling
with replacement, and the median values used as an estimate of the present-day
spatial distribution of suitable and unsuitable conditions for lone star ticks
across New Zealand. Any uncertainty in present-day model predictions was
estimated as the range in the suitability values across model
parameterizations.For predicting the future 2050 spatial distribution of A.
americanum under the two (RCP) scenarios, the optimal present-day
model was transferred to the 2 RCPs and 4 General Circulation Models (GCMs) (see
descriptions below). Again, the models were replicated ten times with a
bootstrap function and the median output was used for model interpretations.The Mobility-oriented Parity (MOP) (Owens et al. 2013) was assessed to determine the novelty of climate
conditions under the present-day conditions in New Zealand relative to the model
calibration area in North America. This procedure was also repeated for the
future predictions. The purpose of MOP analysis was to identify areas in New
Zealand where strict extrapolation, i.e. model predictions outside the
calibration range of at least one of the environmental values found in North
America, had occurred. Caution is required when interpreting the likelihood of
species presence in areas with higher extrapolative predictions (Alkishe et al. 2017).
Future climate data
Two greenhouse gas emission scenarios, representing medium to low
(Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5) and high (RCP 8.5) emissions
and climate consequences were considered; this allowed uncertainty in expected
climate change to be appraised. The climate change projections were made for the
year 2050. For the two RCPs, four general circulation models (GCMs), that
simulate future climates, were explored: CSIRO MK3 Climate System Model (CSIRO
Atmospheric Research), MIROC 5 (Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate,
Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo), NCAR CCSM4 (National
Center for Atmospheric Research, Community Climate System Model-4), and CCCMA
CANESM2 (Canadian Center for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Canadian Earth
System Model-2). All GCM data were downloaded from the Climate Change,
Agriculture and Food Security—Climate Data Portal (CCAFS, 2018), at 30-s
resolution.
Results
There were 14,831 georeferenced occurrence records available for lone star
ticks in the WRBU database. After removing records that did not include uncertainty
information and those with uncertainty > 10,000 m resulted in 6492 records.
Of these, 33 records were determined to be from outside the known range of lone star
ticks. Thirty-one of these records were collected from human subjects reported by
the U.S. Army Institute of Public Health, and it is plausible that there were errors
in reporting locations where tick exposure occurred. Two other records, one each,
submitted by the University of Alberta Entomology Collection and the Australian
Museum lacked metadata. The removal of these 33 locations left 6459 occurrence
records. After the occurrence data were rarefied to an inter-occurrence separation
of > 50 km, there were 185 presence-only locations remaining for analysis.
Figure 1 shows the georeferenced occurrence
locations used in this study and the areas considered by the authors to be
accessible to lone star ticks over time (M).
Fig. 1
Points representing 185 georeferenced occurrence records of
Amblyomma americanum ticks used in the analysis and a
hypothesized area accessible to this species (M) over a period of
time. The black dots are the occurrence data points used in the model
calibration and the black crosses are the occurrence data points used in the
model evaluation
The evaluation of bioclimatic variable contribution to different models
using the jackknife procedure is present in Table
1. The four environmental variables retained in all 4 steps of the
jackknife procedure were Annual Mean Temperature (BIO1), Annual
precipitation (BIO12), Precipitation seasonality (BIO15) and
Precipitation of Driest Quarter (BIO17).
Table 1
Three sets of environmental variables used for three Amblyomma
americanum MaxEnt calibration models and the four steps of the
jackknife procedure used to select the environmental variables in each set
Jackknife step/environmental variable set
Bioclimatic variables used in Maxent
calibration model
Step 1
All Bioclim variables[a]
Step 2/Set 1
BIO1 = Annual Mean
TemperatureBIO2 = Mean Diurnal Range (Mean of
monthly (max temp—min temp))BIO5 = Max
Temperature of Warmest MonthBIO6 = Min Temperature of
Coldest MonthBIO11 = Mean Temperature of Coldest
QuarterBIO12 = Annual
PrecipitationBIO13 = Precipitation of Wettest
MonthBIO14 = Precipitation of Driest
MonthBIO15 = Precipitation Seasonality
(Coefficient of Variation)BIO16 = Precipitation of
Wettest Quarter BIO17 = Precipitation of Driest
Quarter
Step 3/Set 2
BIO1 = Annual Mean
TemperatureBIO5 = Max Temperature of Warmest
MonthBIO11 = Mean Temperature of Coldest
QuarterBIO12 = Annual
PrecipitationBIO14 = Precipitation of Driest
MonthBIO15 = Precipitation Seasonality
(Coefficient of Variation)BIO17 = Precipitation of
Driest Quarter
Step 4/Set 3
BIO1 = Annual Mean Temperature
BIO12 = Annual
PrecipitationBIO15 = Precipitation Seasonality
(Coefficient of Variation) BIO17 = Precipitation of
Driest Quarter
The following BioClim bioclimatic variables, Mean Temperature of
Wettest Quarter (BIO8), Mean Temperature of Driest Quarter
(BIO9), Precipitation of Warmest Quarter (BIO18),
Precipitation of Driest Quarter (BIO19) were a priori excluded
from the WorldClim archive because these layers have been shown to have
spatial artefacts that could affect niche modelling (Escobar et al. 2014)
In all, a total of 285 models was assessed and all were statistically
significant as compared with a null model of random prediction. Six (2.2%) of these
significant models met the omission criterion of less than 10%, and, of the
significant, low-omission models, the model with the minimum AIC value was selected,
which had a regularization parameter value of 2 and the feature class functions were
set for linear, quadratic, product, threshold and hinge. This model included the
environmental variables in set 3, identified in step 4 of the jackknife procedure,
(Table 1). The AIC values of all other
models were higher by more than at least 5 units. The jackknife test of the final
model showed that Annual precipitation (BIO12) had the highest gain when
used in isolation and that Annual Mean Temperature (BIO1) decreased the
gain the most when it was omitted. Meaning that BIO12 is the most useful
environmental variable by itself and that BIO1 has the most information
not present in the other three environmental variables.The median of the best model, here forward mentioned as present-day model
(Fig. 2a), identified areas with different
levels of suitability for lone star ticks across New Zealand. Large areas of New
Zealand are predicted to be highly suitable. In the North Island, these areas are
concentrated predominantly along the south, south-eastern and north central parts of
the North Island. However, the other areas in the North Island were also suitable in
the medium to low range for the tick. In the South Island, suitable areas in the
high to medium range include large areas of the north and eastern half of the island
extending to cover large contiguous areas of the south-eastern part of the island.
Of note is that much of the mountainous regions and the valleys in both islands are
low suitable areas under the present-day climate conditions. The present-day model
had large areas with a low uncertainty throughout the predicted distribution range
(Fig. 2b). The MOP analysis revealed areas
such as the West Coast in the South Island and some mountainous regions in the North
Island, for which predictions were strictly based on model extrapolation (Fig. 2c).
Fig. 2
a Predicted suitability areas for Amblyomma
americanum ticks under present-day climatic conditions in New
Zealand, as modelled with MaxEnt. White areas are unsuitable and yellow to red
areas are increasingly suitable. b Uncertainty associated with the
predicted suitability areas for A. americanum ticks under
present-day climatic conditions in New Zealand, as modelled with MaxEnt. The
uncertainty increases from white to dark grey. c Areas representing
strictly extrapolative prediction of suitability for A.
americanum ticks under present-day climatic conditions in New
Zealand. The red areas are extrapolative and predictions for these areas should
be regarded with considerable caution (Owens et
al. 2013).
The potential for future suitability and distribution of A.
americanum under both medium to low and high emission scenarios did not
change by a large area compared to the potential present-day suitability (Figs. 3a, 4a); but, under both scenarios there were moderate increases in the
suitability for this tick species along the mountain valleys in the South Island.
Under the high emission scenario, there were some loss of territory compared to the
potential present-day distribution (Fig. 4a).
The MOP analysis of suitabilities in New Zealand in the future under both emission
scenarios (RCP 4.5 and 8.5) compared to the calibration area in North America
revealed that predictions for areas predominantly in the mountains and valleys in
South Island were strictly extrapolative (Figs.
3b, 4b).
Fig. 3
a The agreement in predicted suitability of areas for
Amblyomma americanum ticks between different Global
Circulation Models (GCMs) under the Low Emission, Representative Concentration
Pathway (RCP) 4.5 Emission Scenario. Where 1 = areas in which one of the four
GCMs predicted suitability for A. americanum distribution. 2,
3, 4 = two, three and four GCMs predicted suitability, respectively. 5 = areas
in which one of the four GCMs predicted loss of territory for A.
americanum compared to the present-day distribution. 6, 7, 8 = two,
three, and four GCMs predicted loss of territory, respectively. 9 = no observed
change from predicted current A. americanum distribution.
b Degree of agreement between Global Circulation Models (GCMs)
on extrapolative prediction of suitability areas for A.
americanum ticks under the Low Emission, Representative
Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 Scenario. Where 1 = Areas in which the
prediction based on one of the four GCMs were strictly extrapolative. 2, 3, 4 =
degree of agreement in strict extrapolative areas based on two, three and all
four models, respectively
Fig. 4
a The agreement in predicted suitability of areas for
Amblyomma americanum ticks between different Global
Circulation Models (GCMs) under the High Emission, Representative Concentration
Pathway (RCP) 8.5 emission scenario. Where 1 = areas in which one of the four
GCMs predicted suitability for A. americanum distribution. 2,
3, 4 = two, three and four GCMs predicted suitability, respectively. 5 = areas
in which one of the four GCMs predicted loss of territory for A.
americanum compared to the present-day distribution. 6, 7, 8 = two,
three, and four GCMs predicted loss of territory, respectively. 9 = no observed
change from predicted current distribution. b Degree of agreement
between Global Circulation Models (GCMs) on extrapolative prediction of
suitability areas for A. americanum ticks under the Low
Emission, Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 Scenario. Where 1 =
Areas in which the prediction based on one of the four GCMs were strictly
extrapolative. 2, 3, 4 = degree of agreement in strict extrapolative areas based
on two, three and all four models, respectively
Discussion
Predicted distribution
In the present study, the projected distribution for A.
americanum shown in Fig. 2a
closely matches that known for H. longicornis in New Zealand,
although parts of the South Island that are predicted as suitable for A.
americanum are slightly more extensive than those currently
predicted as a possible extension of the range of H.
longicornis (Lawrence et al.
2017).The 4 Bioclim variables included in the final model were Annual Mean
Temperature (BIO1), Annual Precipitation (BIO12), Precipitation Seasonality
(Coefficient of Variation) (BIO15) and Precipitation of Driest Quarter (BIO17).
The annual mean temperature is the average monthly average temperature, the
annual precipitation is the sum of all the monthly rainfall, the precipitation
seasonality is the ratio of the standard deviation of the monthly rainfall to
the average monthly rainfall and precipitation of driest quarter is the total
rainfall for the driest consecutive months. The jackknife test identified the
two most important environmental variables were Annual Mean Temperature (BIO1)
and Annual Precipitation (BIO12).The largest proportions of the tick’s life cycle, by time, are
occupied by the free-living stages which are spent mostly hidden under herbage
at ground level. Water exchanges in ticks only occur through the general cuticle
surface (Browning 1954), thus the
hydration status of the tick will depend on the ambient temperature, rainfall
and the atmospheric water pressure. These requirements explain why these two
variables are so important.Within New Zealand, mapping and modelling exercises (Heath 2016; Lawrence
et al. 2017) show H. longicornis to be widespread in
broadly defined, climatically suitable areas, at least when viewed on a large
scale. However, a shift of focus reveals a diverse pattern within landscapes,
comprising a mosaic of topography (physiography), vegetation and land use types.
Within this mix are ecosystems with biotopes that are less suitable for tick
survival or proliferation, or have a lower density of hosts than others. For
instance, south-facing slopes, short grass, and excessively wet areas are less
likely to be a suitable H. longicornis habitat. In contrast,
warmer north-facing slopes, long but not overly wet pasture, and areas that
offer shelter to livestock and wild hosts provide more survival opportunities
for ticks (Heath 2016).These favoured ecotypes are defined by macro and microclimates, and the
vegetation and land use patterns they allow, as discussed below.
Prediction variables
Figure 2b depicts uncertainty
associated with the predicted suitability area under present day conditions and,
broadly, presents more uncertainty around many areas where H.
longicornis occurs commonly and thrives; i.e., Northland,
Coromandel, East Cape, Taranaki and northern Manawatu. The implications from
this are that not all of the regions populated by H.
longicornis would necessarily suit A. americanum
although this appears to be contradicted by the predicted distribution shown in
Fig. 2a.Figure 2c shows areas representing
strictly extrapolative predictions of suitability under present day conditions.
These cover all of the West Coast, South Island and a small number of high
altitude locations in the North Island. With relevance to this, Springer et al. (2015) found that their projected
distribution for A. americanum excluded a high-altitude
region.The remaining figures show agreement in predicted suitability of areas
between different global circulation models under low emission (Fig. 3a), degree of agreement between GCM on
extrapolation prediction of suitability under low emission (Fig. 3b), agreement in predicted suitability of areas
between different GCMs under high emission and (4a), and the degree of agreement
between GCM on extrapolation prediction of suitability under high emission
(Fig. 4b).The predicted distribution in Fig.
3a covers all of the Southern Alps where there are 16 peaks exceeding
3000 m, and a location near the North Island Volcanic Plateau. The predicted
distribution shown in Fig. 4a is similar.
The predicted extrapolative distribution shown in Fig. 3b is like that in Fig.
2c, as is that in Fig. 4b, which
also has a pattern similar to that shown in Fig.
3b. In summary both climate change models project range expansion of
A. americanum into the mountainous areas of South Island
but with the predictions for the mountains and West Coast also being
extrapolative. The predominately mountainous areas are unlikely to be suitable
for establishment of A. americanum under any but extreme
climate-warming scenarios, and even then, vegetation and host density would
become only gradually suitable over a long period of time following any change.
The lower altitude NW South Island and West Coast middle regions are currently
suitable in parts for H. longicornis and any change to warmer
or wetter climates would only benefit ticks, including A.
americanum.Despite mountainous areas in the South Island apparently becoming
suitable for A. americanum under global warming, long periods
of snow cover would still be likely to occur at the highest altitudes and could
be a deterrent, although snow is not limiting to the survival of active stages
of some species of ticks (e.g. H. longicornis). They can
survive beneath it, but incubation of eggs is inhibited at temperatures below
their developmental threshold, around 12 °C for H.
longicornis.Clark (1995), found mean activity
thresholds [i.e. no movement of ticks] between 7 and 7.6 °C for adults
and 9.6 °C for nymphs of A. americanum and mean
uncoordinated thresholds [movement but uncoordinated] of 12.3 °C for
nymphs and 9.1–10.2 °C for adults.Spontaneous freezing and direct chilling were not considered significant
mortality factors in the field but inoculative freezing: ice nucleation around
organic or inorganic entities (Costanzo and Lee
2013) is an important cause of overwintering mortality, following 2 h
at − 5 and − 3 °C in direct contact with ice (Burks et al. 1996). Haemaphysalis
longicornis is freeze susceptible (Yu et al. 2014) and gradual exposure to low temperatures can enhance
its cold hardiness, while the possible formation of cryoprotective proteins is
suggested, but not proven.Stewart et al. (1998) found that
adults of A. americanum did not undergo behavioural diapause
when winter-exposed. However, developmental diapause can be photoperiodically
induced in fed nymphs of A. americanum (Pound and George 1988) and it is of the long day type
between 10:14 and 12:12 (light:dark) being critical.Collectively these data suggest that A. americanum
would respond to low temperatures in a similar fashion to H.
longicornis, so would find no shortage of suitable habitats in New
Zealand.
Distribution and climate
The New Zealand climate can be generalised as temperate (Cfb) under the
Köppen-Geiger classification (Kottek et
al. 2006; Heath 2013; Anon 2018), warm tropical in the north and
cool temperate further south. Over much of the USA range of A.
americanum, there are temperate (Csb) and continental (Dfa)
climates with warm, dry summers (Csb) and hot summers with no dry season (Dfa).
Although New Zealand is generally Cfb this is considered to be a summation of 18
different climate types, some of which readily match the features of those
within the North American range of the lone star tick.
Bioclimatic preferences
The survival and duration of each stage in the tick life cycle are
controlled by physical environmental parameters; the bioclimate. This in turn
determines the distribution of ticks. From what is known about A.
americanum physiology and ecology, much of New Zealand would be
suitable. Both H. longicornis and A.
americanum are three-host ticks, with each stage spending
considerable amounts of time off the host. All stages of A.
americanum prefer a moisture-rich environment, and there is a
critical humid atmosphere necessary for females to produce eggs that incubate
successfully with the suggestion that long periods of drought resulted in a
decline in tick populations (Lancaster and
McMillan 1955). Nymphs are especially intolerant of dehydration
(Yoder and Benoit 2003) but that
stage can also take up water, so will thrive in dry environments when (and as
long as) water becomes available, as can adults (Sauer and Hair 1971). Moulting (Yoder et al. 2012) and hatching (Patrick and Hair 1979) take place when air is fully or nearly fully
saturated and eggs can tolerate submersion for a week.Wet environments can, however, be a disadvantage because fungal
infections could arise and increase permeability, doubling water loss from
female ticks (Yoder et al. 2006). This
suggests that damp habitats, or times of the year with high rainfall could pose
survival problems, at least for females. The West Coast of the South Island has
very high annual rainfall 2000 to 3000 mm/year, which probably accounts for the
extrapolative predictions, and as such could include habitats less suitable for
A. americanum.The climate predictor variable with the best explanatory power for
A. americanum in the model used by Springer et al. (2015) was mean July (mid-summer)
saturation vapour pressure, a time when larvae begin to make their appearance.
This has interesting parallels with Heath
(2016) where the median March (late summer) average vapour pressure
was found to be a good fit with H. longicornis distribution,
being coincidental with the onset and extent of the seasonal activity period of
the larva.
Vegetation & soil types
Vegetation types in which A. americanum is found (McCoy 1971) differ from those occurring in
New Zealand which has considerable pasture cover, around 40% of total land area
(Anon 2007), with the remainder in
exotic (mostly conifer) and native forests. Amblyomma
americanum prefers secondary growth woodland (Brown et al. 2011), with pine forests not a suitable
habitat, and neither was meadow with short pasture exposed to sun and wind
(Koch 1984). McCoy (1971) however, found ticks on grassy areas
that cattle had access to with all stages found on animals grazing in the shade
at the base of a levee.Larvae prefer vegetation cover whilst adults tend to be found in more
open ground that is debris free (Brown et al.
2011; Gilliam et al. 2018).
Sites with dense cover and little penetration of sunlight (and high humidity)
provided greatest protection compared with sparsely forested sites with little
understory and litter. In a separate study, nymphs and males were found to have
preferred shaded areas while females favoured sunny (sunlit; exposed) sites
(Koch and Burg 2006). It was
suggested this increased host finding chances because nymphs and adults move
independently of hosts and so utilize much of their habitats which would
maximize their chances of coming in contact with a host.Despite apparent ecosytem differences between NZ and USA, as long as
temperature and humidity requirements are met and vegetation cover of an
appropriate length and location is available it would appear there is little
impediment for A. americanum to establish in New Zealand.
Hosts
The lone star tick has a large host range with McCoy (1971) listing historical records of many
mammals and birds, including (relevant in a New Zealand context) cattle, horses,
deer, dog and cat for all stages; chicken and turkey, larvae and nymphs; sheep,
adults only and mouse, nymphs only. Similar extensive host associations are
found with H. longicornis (Myers 1924; Heath 2016).
Seasonality
The collective effects of annual weather variables on ticks are
reflected in their seasonal activity patterns as each stage goes through its
developmental phases.The seasonal activity of A. americanum in a range of
states of the USA has been well defined (e.g., Davidson et al. 1994; Kollars et al.
2000; Childs and Paddock 2003;
Bouzek et al. 2013; Cortinas and Spomer 2013; Gilliam et al. 2018) In summary, adult and nymphal
lone star ticks are generally most active during April (as early in February in
Mississippi for adults; Jackson et al.
1996)) through June, and decline markedly in abundance and activity
as summer progresses, with October last month for activity of larvae and nymphs.
The early-season activity of adult and nymphal ticks precedes that of larvae
(Childs and Paddock 2003) with some
larvae possibly overwintering in Georgia. In the more southern states, activity
generally begins about a month earlier than in northern states, but goes on for
the same length of time independent of state latitude. Ticks are not active
during November to January but can be found during the remainder of the year. As
soil temperatures increase in spring, egg hatching is encouraged (Patrick and Hair 1979). Soil surface
temperature affected frequency of hatching more than did soil moisture, with
larval survival shorter in a meadow habitat (Patrick and Hair 1979). High temperature and low humidity extended
larval pre-activity (post-hatch movement) out to over 4 weeks in late summer
(Patrick and Hair 1979).Fed larvae, engorged and flat nymphs, unfed adults all overwintered in
one study (McCoy 1971), but unfed larvae
did not. If these data are extrapolated to a Southern Hemisphere scenario, they
show that A. americanum would require little if any seasonal
adjustment to New Zealand climatic conditions and would be active over most of
the year as is H. longicornis, and would provide yet another
vector for theileriosis organisms that threaten the dairy industry, not just in
New Zealand (Lawrence et al. 2016a), but
potentially in the USA (Chae et al. 1999;
Oakes et al. 2019).
Conclusion
The lone star tick was not chosen for this modelling exercise because the
authors believe there is an imminent risk of its incursion into New Zealand. It was
chosen because it is now effectively considered sympatric with H.
longicornis given the substantial recent spread of this species in
eastern USA leading to some overlap in range of both species, and because there
exist extensive occurrence data from museum collections in the USA, on which to
calibrate an accurate ecological niche model. The model supports the conclusions of
Heath (2013) that there are many ticks
worldwide that given the opportunity and license could successfully establish in New
Zealand.
Authors: Heidi E Brown; Karen F Yates; Gabrielle Dietrich; Katherine MacMillan; Christine B Graham; Sara M Reese; Wm Steve Helterbrand; William L Nicholson; Keith Blount; Paul S Mead; Sarah L Patrick; Rebecca J Eisen Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Taylor G Donaldson; Adalberto A Pèrez de León; Andrew Y Li; Andrew I Li; Ivan Castro-Arellano; Edward Wozniak; William K Boyle; Reid Hargrove; Hannah K Wilder; Hee J Kim; Pete D Teel; Job E Lopez Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2016-02-01
Authors: Gina Polo; Hermes R Luz; André Luis Regolin; Thiago F Martins; Gisele R Winck; Hélio R da Silva; Valeria C Onofrio; Marcelo B Labruna; João L H Faccini Journal: Parasitol Res Date: 2020-10-17 Impact factor: 2.289
Authors: Emily L Pascoe; Santiago Nava; Marcelo B Labruna; Christopher D Paddock; Michael L Levin; Matteo Marcantonio; Janet E Foley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-08-24 Impact factor: 3.752