Literature DB >> 31964288

Bypassing the Closest Stroke Center for Thrombectomy Candidates: What Additional Delay to Thrombolysis Is Acceptable?

Ludwig Schlemm1,2,3, Matthias Endres1,2,3,4,5, Christian H Nolte1,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Patients with acute ischemic stroke who have large vessel occlusion benefit from direct transport to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) capable of endovascular therapy. To avoid harm for patients without large vessel occlusion from delayed access to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), it has been suggested to only redirect patients with high likelihood of large vessel occlusion for whom the additional delay to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) caused by transport to the CSC is below a certain threshold. However, which threshold achieves the greatest clinical benefit is unknown. Methods- We used mathematical modeling to calculate additional-delay-to-IVT thresholds associated with the greatest reduction in disability-adjusted life years in abstracted 2-stroke center and multiple-stroke center scenarios. Model parameters were extracted from recent meta-analyses or large prospective cohort studies. Uncertainty was quantified in probabilistic and 2-way univariate sensitivity analyses. Results- Assuming ideal treatment time performance metrics, transport to the nearest CSC was the preferred strategy irrespective of additional delay-to-IVT when the transfer time between primary stroke center and CSC was <40 minutes (95% credible interval: 25-66 minutes); otherwise, the optimal additional delay-to-IVT-threshold ranged from 28 to 139 minutes. In multiple-stroke center scenarios, optimal additional-delay-to-IVT thresholds were 30 to 54 minutes in urban and 49 to 141 minutes in rural settings; use of optimal thresholds as compared with a 15 minute-threshold saved 0 to 0.11 and 0 to 0.37 disability-adjusted life years per triage case, respectively. Assuming slower treatment times at primary stroke centers and CSCs yielded longer permissible additional delays. Conclusions- Our results suggest that patients with acute ischemic stroke with suspected large vessel occlusion should be redirected to a CSC if the additional delay to IVT is <30 minutes in urban and 50 minutes in rural settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  algorithms; decision analysis; emergency medical services; stroke; thrombectomy; thrombolysis; triage

Year:  2020        PMID: 31964288     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  10 in total

Review 1.  Acute ischemic stroke treatment model for Poland in the mechanical thrombectomy era - which way to go?

Authors:  Krzysztof Pawłowski; Artur Dziadkiewicz; Jacek Klaudel; Alicja Mączkowiak; Marek Szołkiewicz
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 1.065

2.  Performance of the vision, aphasia, neglect (VAN) assessment within a single large EMS system.

Authors:  Mehul D Patel; Jackie Thompson; José G Cabañas; Jefferson G Williams; Erin Lewis; Michael Bachman; Mahmoud Al Masry; Charles LaVigne; Leonardo Morantes; Tibor Becske; Omar Kass-Hout
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.836

3.  Can Helicopters Solve the Transport Dilemma for Patients With Symptoms of Large-Vessel Occlusion Stroke in Intermediate Density Areas? A Simulation Model Based on Real Life Data.

Authors:  Anne Behrndtz; Richard Beare; Svitlana Iievlieva; Grethe Andersen; Jeppe Mainz; Martin Gude; Henry Ma; Velandai Srikanth; Claus Z Simonsen; Thanh Phan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Optimizing Patient Selection for Interhospital Transfer and Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Real-World Data From a Supraregional, Hub-and-Spoke Neurovascular Network in Germany.

Authors:  Maria-Ioanna Stefanou; Vera Stadler; Dominik Baku; Florian Hennersdorf; Ulrike Ernemann; Ulf Ziemann; Sven Poli; Annerose Mengel
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 5.  Emerging Detection Techniques for Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Jennifer K Nicholls; Jonathan Ince; Jatinder S Minhas; Emma M L Chung
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Validation of a shortened FAST-ED algorithm for smartphone app guided stroke triage.

Authors:  Benedikt Frank; Felix Fabian; Bastian Brune; Bessime Bozkurt; Cornelius Deuschl; Raul G Nogueira; Christoph Kleinschnitz; Martin Köhrmann
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.570

7.  Endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke with the drip-and-ship model-Insights from the German Stroke Registry.

Authors:  Jan Hendrik Schaefer; Natalia Kurka; Fee Keil; Marlies Wagner; Helmuth Steinmetz; Waltraud Pfeilschifter; Ferdinand O Bohmann
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Reducing delay to endovascular reperfusion after relocating a thrombolysis unit.

Authors:  Nicolaj Grønbæk Laugesen; Klaus Hansen; Joan Højgaard; Helle Klingenberg Iversen; Thomas Truelsen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  New Prehospital Triage for Stroke Patients Significantly Reduces Transport Time of EVT Patients Without Delaying IVT.

Authors:  Martin Cabal; Linda Machova; Daniel Vaclavik; Petr Jasso; David Holes; Ondrej Volny; Michal Bar
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Prehospital Triage Strategies for the Transportation of Suspected Stroke Patients in the United States.

Authors:  Esmee Venema; James F Burke; Bob Roozenbeek; Jason Nelson; Hester F Lingsma; Diederik W J Dippel; David M Kent
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 7.914

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.