| Literature DB >> 31963870 |
Jakub Sandak1,2, Anna Sandak1,3, Andreas Zitek4, Barbara Hintestoisser5, Gianni Picchi6.
Abstract
Portable spectroscopic instruments are an interesting alternative for in-field and on-line measurements. However, the practical implementation of visible-near infrared (VIS-NIR) portable sensors in the forest sector is challenging due to operation in harsh environmental conditions and natural variability of wood itself. The objective of this work was to use spectroscopic methods as an alternative to visual grading of wood quality. Three portable spectrometers covering visible and near infrared range were used for the detection of selected naturally occurring wood defects, such as knots, decay, resin pockets and reaction wood. Measurements were performed on wooden discs collected during the harvesting process, without any conditioning or sample preparation. Two prototype instruments were developed by integrating commercially available micro-electro-mechanical systems with for-purpose selected lenses and light source. The prototype modules of spectrometers were driven by an Arduino controller. Data were transferred to the PC by USB serial port. Performance of all tested instruments was confronted by two discriminant methods. The best performing was the microNIR instrument, even though the performance of custom prototypes was also satisfactory. This work was an essential part of practical implementation of VIS-NIR spectroscopy for automatic grading of logs directly in the forest. Prototype low-cost spectrometers described here formed the basis for development of a prototype hyperspectral imaging solution tested during harvesting of trees within the frame of a practical demonstration in mountain forests.Entities:
Keywords: NIR spectroscopy; in-filed measurement; portable instruments; wood defects
Year: 2020 PMID: 31963870 PMCID: PMC7014491 DOI: 10.3390/s20020545
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Experimental samples in a form of wooden disks containing diverse wood defects as used for spectroscopic measurements.
Basic characteristic of tested spectrometers.
| Bruker MPA | MicroNIR Pro 1700 | Hamamatsu NIR C11708MA | Hamamatsu VIS C12666MA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sensor technology | FT (Fourier Transform) | Linear Variable Filter | MEMS micro-electro-mechanical systems | MEMS micro-electro-mechanical systems |
| range (nm) | 833–2500 | 950–1650 | 640–1050 | 340–780 |
| resolution (nm) | 0.8 | 6.2 | 20 | 15 |
| weight (g) | 15,000 | 64 | 9 | 5 |
| portable | no | yes | yes | yes |
| instrument available on the market | yes | yes | no | no |
| measurement time (s) for a single spectrum | 30 | 0.05–0.5 | 0.05–0.5 | 0.05–0.5 |
Figure 2Absorbance spectra measured on the wood surface by different instruments evaluated.
Figure 3Focusing optics used in prototype spectrometers (a), the lenses, spectrometer with illumination installed on the breadboard (b) and assembled instruments ready for measurements (c).
Figure 4Different sources of light tested for suitability in developed prototypes and the spectral response recorded by the Hamamatsu NIR C11708MA sensor.
Figure 5Connection diagram of Hamamatsu C12880MA (a) and C11708MA (b) micro-spectrometers to the Arduino UNO microcontroller.
Figure 6Model spectra of wood and wood defects detected by Fourier transform infrared (FT-NIR) instrument.
Band assignment characteristic for wood, according to Schwanninger et al. [31] and Vagnini et al. [32].
| Wavenumber (cm−1) | Wavelength (nm) | Wood Component | Functional Group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4198 | 2382 | holocellulose | CH |
| 2 | 4280 | 2336 | cellulose | CH, CH2 |
| 3 | 4404 | 2270 | cellulose, hemicellulose | CH, CH2, OH, CO |
| 4 | 4620 | 2164 | cellulose, hemicellulose | OH, CH |
| 5 | 4890 | 2044 | cellulose semicrystalline and crystalline | OH, CH |
| 6 | 5219 | 1916 | water | OH |
| 7 | 5464 | 1830 | cellulose semicrystalline and crystalline | C=O |
| 8 | 5587 | 1790 | cellulose semicrystalline and crystalline | CH |
| 9 | 5700 | 1754 | extractives | CH2 |
| 10 | 5800 | 1724 | hemicellulose (furanose/pyranose) | CH |
| 11 | 5812 | 1720 | extractives | CH2 |
| 12 | 5883 | 1700 | hemicellulose | CH |
| 13 | 5909 | 1692 | extractives | CH |
| 14 | 5980 | 1672 | lignin | CH |
| 15 | 6117 | 1635 | extractives | CH2 |
| 16 | 6287 | 1590 | cellulose crystalline | OH |
| 17 | 6450 | 1550 | cellulose crystalline | OH |
| 18 | 6722 | 1487 | cellulose semicrystalline | OH |
| 19 | 6785 | 1474 | cellulose | OH |
| 20 | 7008 | 1426 | amorphous cellulose/water | OH |
| 21 | 7309 | 1368 | aliphatic chains | CH |
| 22 | 7344 | 1361 | extractives | CH |
| 23 | 7418 | 1348 | aliphatic chains | CH |
Figure 7Automatic identification of defects on wood samples with Partial Least Squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) (SR—success rate).
Figure 8First four loadings (lateral variables LV) for PLSDA models of wood defects as obtained for HamamatsuVIS (a), HamamatsuNIR (b) and microNIR (c).
Figure 9Automatic identification of defects on wood samples with Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification.