| Literature DB >> 31963865 |
Jie Wan1,2, Xuyin Yuan1, Lei Han1, Hongmeng Ye3, Xiaofan Yang2.
Abstract
In this study, the characteristics anpan>d distributionpan> of the pan> class="Disease">organic phosphorus (Po) fractions in the surface sediments of seven inflow rivers around Hongze Lake in China were analyzed with a soil Po fraction method, as used by Ivanoff. The relationships between the Po fractions and physiochemical features of sediments were also discussed. The results showed that, the sediments of the rivers had been moderately pollution with certain ecological risk effects except the Waste Yellow River. The relative contribution order of the Po fractions in the sediments was residual Po > HCl-Po > fulvic acid-Po > humic acid-Po > labile organic phosphorus (LOP). Moderately labile organic phosphorus (MLOP) was the main part of the Po forms in the whole sediments. The risk of phosphorus released from river sediments was the highest in the western region, followed by the southwestern region, and finally the northwestern region. There were significant correlations between Po forms and total phosphorus (TP), inorganic phosphorus (Pi), and Po. Non labile organic phosphorus (NLOP) had the strongest correlation with TP. The distribution of Po forms in each region was different due to the impact of human activities, industrial and agricultural production and the land types; the heaver polluted sediments with higher Po fractions. It is suggested that most of the sediments of the inflow rivers in the regions have certain ecological risk effects and P of them have an important contributions on the eutrophication of Hongze Lake. Po forms can provide a reliable theoretical basis for dealing with the change of water quality and should be paid more attention in the lake eutrophication investigation. There was reciprocal transformation between different Po forms, especially non-bioavailable fraction can change into bio-available ones. The results can provide a basis for the earth cycle of phosphorus and a new perspective of eutrophication control of shallow lakes.Entities:
Keywords: Hongze Lake; eutrophication; inflow river; organic phosphorus; sediment
Year: 2020 PMID: 31963865 PMCID: PMC7013800 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17020648
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The map of sampling points. North western rivers: Waste Yellow River (F and C); Xuhong River (X); and an River (A); western rivers: Sui River (S); and Bian River (B); south western rivers: Huaihongxin River (HX); and Huaihe River (H).
Figure 2Fractionation procedure of organic phosphorus (Po) fractions in the sediments.
Characteristics and physiochemical features of sediments. The organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), inorganicphosphorus (Pi), organic phosphorus (Po), nitrogen/phosphorus (N/P). Coefficient of Variation (C/V).
| Region | River Name | Parameters | CaO (%) | MnO (%) | Fe2O3 (%) | Al2O3 (%) | pH | OM (%) | TP (mg·kg−1) | TN (mg·kg−21) | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northwestern | Waste Yellow River | Range | 3.2–3.56 | 0.04–0.10 | 1.58–4.35 | 4.12–8.66 | 6.49–8.17 | 0.11–2.87 | 413.65–597.94 | 686.92–930.41 | 1.52–1.91 |
| Mean | 3.38 | 0.07 | 3.15 | 6.39 | 7.47 | 1.22 | 488.90 | 840.96 | 1.72 | ||
| CV (%) | 3.42 | 28.10 | 24.64 | 20.54 | 5.00 | 61.69 | 12.00 | 10.00 | 0.07 | ||
| Xuhong River | Range | 3.14–4.63 | 0.04–0.10 | 1.91–4.68 | 6.64–11.18 | 7.03–8.2 | 0.19–2.99 | 450.57–692.42 | 554.32–1020.42 | 1.20–1.99 | |
| Mean | 4.10 | 0.07 | 3.48 | 8.91 | 7.65 | 0.98 | 566.40 | 887.60 | 1.57 | ||
| CV (%) | 11.72 | 27.12 | 22.30 | 14.73 | 4.40 | 78.78 | 15.00 | 17.00 | 0.13 | ||
| An River | Range | 3.31–4.81 | 0.04–0.10 | 2.29–5.06 | 8.1–12.65 | 7.47–8.02 | 0.47–3.00 | 372.71–934.86 | 699.29–1220.22 | 1.30–1.88 | |
| Mean | 4.26 | 0.07 | 3.68 | 9.24 | 7.67 | 1.39 | 606.75 | 967.83 | 1.60 | ||
| CV (%) | 8.65 | 22.59 | 14.96 | 12.96 | 2.30 | 46.29 | 20.00 | 14.00 | 0.1 | ||
| Population mean | 3.91 | 0.07 | 3.44 | 8.18 | 7.60 | 1.20 | 554.02 | 898.80 | 1.63 | ||
| Western | Sui River | Range | 4.79–6.28 | 0.06–0.11 | 4.2–5.35 | 11.08–15.63 | 7.92–8.71 | 0.84–3.46 | 649.15–1051.45 | 1051.85–1243.00 | 1.12–1.62 |
| Mean | 5.89 | 0.08 | 4.45 | 13.80 | 8.34 | 1.73 | 840.22 | 1130.62 | 1.35 | ||
| CV (%) | 7.70 | 21.42 | 11.98 | 8.89 | 3.34 | 45.11 | 18.00 | 5.00 | 0.13 | ||
| Bian River | Range | 4.79–6.47 | 0.08–0.13 | 4.19–6.22 | 11.27–15.81 | 7.83–9.04 | 0.99–3.92 | 799.76–1076.54 | 813.42–1367.89 | 0.95–1.33 | |
| Mean | 6.03 | 0.10 | 5.34 | 14.02 | 8.59 | 2.11 | 960.22 | 1123.82 | 1.17 | ||
| CV (%) | 7.42 | 19.03 | 9.52 | 9.54 | 4.10 | 35.32 | 10.00 | 16.00 | 0.11 | ||
| Population mean | 5.96 | 0.09 | 4.90 | 13.91 | 8.47 | 1.92 | 900.22 | 1127.22 | 1.26 | ||
| Southwestern | Huaihongxin River | Range | 4.05–5.55 | 0.05–0.11 | 2.72–5.40 | 8.71–13.25 | 7.78–8.35 | 0.77–3.04 | 630.21–793.88 | 673.65–1316.54 | 0.84–2.09 |
| Mean | 5.06 | 0.08 | 4.02 | 11.22 | 8.07 | 1.68 | 727.51 | 1039.27 | 1.43 | ||
| CV (%) | 9.40 | 22.59 | 17.40 | 10.53 | 2.90 | 43.13 | 8.00 | 20.00 | 0.27 | ||
| Huaihe River | Range | 3.21–4.71 | 0.05–0.10 | 2.29–5.06 | 8.1–12.65 | 7.20–8.11 | 0.89–2.32 | 547.99–689.67 | 960.54–1120.31 | 1.51–1.67 | |
| Mean | 4.33 | 0.07 | 3.77 | 10.74 | 7.80 | 1.54 | 625.48 | 1015.81 | 1.62 | ||
| CV (%) | 11.10 | 25.00 | 22.79 | 11.93 | 3.51 | 28.04 | 8.00 | 6.00 | 0.05 | ||
| Population mean | 4.695 | 0.075 | 3.895 | 10.98 | 7.935 | 1.61 | 676.5 | 1027.54 | 1.525 | ||
Figure 3Concentrations of P fractions in the sediments of the seven rivers. Organic phosphorus (Po), inorganic phosphorus; (Pi), phosphorus (P).
Figure 4Relative contribution of P fractions in the sediments of the seven rivers. Total phosphorus (TP).
Distributions and the recovery of different Po fractions in the sediments. Labile organic phosphorus (LOP) moderately labile organic phosphorus (MLOP) and non labile organic phosphorus (NLOP), total extracted phosphorus (OPEX).
| Region | Sediments | LOP | MLOP | NLOP | OPEX (mg·kg−1) | Po (mg·kg−1) | Recovery (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NaHCO3-PO | HCl-Po | Fuvic Acid-Po | Residual Po | Humic Acid-Po | ||||||||||
| (mg·kg−1) | % | (mg·kg−1) | % | (mg·kg−1) | % | (mg·kg−21) | % | (mg·kg−1) | % | |||||
| Northwestern | Waste Yellow River | 10.47 | 6.52 | 36.07 | 22.45 | 51.44 | 32.02 | 41.14 | 25.61 | 21.54 | 13.41 | 160.67 | 167.16 | 96.12 |
| Xuhong River | 11.22 | 6.12 | 49.90 | 27.22 | 45.00 | 24.55 | 54.47 | 29.71 | 22.74 | 12.40 | 183.34 | 188.59 | 97.22 | |
| An River | 11.29 | 5.98 | 56.26 | 29.78 | 40.52 | 21.45 | 57.34 | 30.36 | 23.48 | 12.43 | 188.89 | 197.90 | 106.57 | |
| mean | 10.99 | 6.20 | 47.41 | 26.49 | 45.66 | 26.01 | 50.98 | 28.56 | 22.59 | 12.75 | 177.63 | 184.55 | 99.97 | |
| Western | Sui River | 12.53 | 5.66 | 73.43 | 33.19 | 29.31 | 13.25 | 84.96 | 38.40 | 21.03 | 9.50 | 221.26 | 208.56 | 106.09 |
| Bian River | 13.55 | 5.66 | 79.78 | 33.32 | 25.42 | 10.62 | 102.24 | 42.70 | 18.46 | 7.71 | 239.45 | 228.88 | 104.62 | |
| mean | 13.04 | 5.66 | 76.61 | 33.25 | 27.36 | 11.93 | 93.60 | 40.55 | 19.75 | 8.61 | 230.36 | 218.72 | 105.35 | |
| Southwestern | Huaihongxin River | 12.01 | 5.75 | 69.13 | 33.09 | 30.02 | 14.37 | 72.52 | 34.72 | 25.20 | 12.06 | 208.89 | 202.63 | 103.09 |
| Huai River | 11.58 | 5.90 | 62.63 | 31.92 | 35.80 | 18.25 | 63.05 | 32.14 | 23.13 | 11.79 | 196.19 | 201.19 | 97.52 | |
| mean | 11.80 | 5.83 | 65.88 | 32.51 | 32.91 | 16.31 | 67.79 | 33.43 | 24.17 | 11.93 | 202.54 | 201.91 | 100.30 | |
| Population mean | 11.81 | 5.94 | 61.25 | 30.51 | 36.34 | 18.11 | 68.81 | 34.28 | 22.21 | 11.06 | 200.74 | 199.80 | 101.60 | |
The relationships between Po fractions and physiochemical features.
| Fractions | MnO | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | CaO | pH | OM | TN | TP | Po | Pi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liable Po | 0.759 ** | 0.713 ** | 0.658 ** | 0.671 ** | 0.743 ** | 0.600 ** | 0.578 ** | 0.756 ** | 0.723 ** | 0.696 ** |
| Moderately labile Po | 0.682 ** | 0.627 ** | 0.564 ** | 0.911 ** | 0.875 ** | 0.595 ** | 0.572 ** | 0.673 ** | 0.633 ** | 0.658 ** |
| Nonlabile Po | 0.759 ** | 0.933 ** | 0.864 ** | 0.575 ** | 0.662 ** | 0.689 ** | 0.680 ** | 0.934 ** | 0.930 ** | 0.511 ** |
** p < 0.01; n = 65.