| Literature DB >> 31963829 |
Mariana Stefania Raita1, Simona Liliana Iconaru2, Andreea Groza3, Carmen Cimpeanu4, Gabriel Predoi1, Liliana Ghegoiu2, Monica Luminita Badea2,5, Mariana Carmen Chifiriuc6,7, Luminita Marutescu6,7, Roxana Trusca8, Ciprian Florin Furnaris1, Claudiu Stefan Turculet9, Dorin Valter Enache10, Daniela Predoi2.
Abstract
There is significant research showing that essential oils extracted from the plants have antibacterial effects. The purpose of this study was to develop a biocomposite based on hydroxyapatite coated with Artemisia absinthium essential oil and to highlight its antibacterial activity. Therefore, present studies are aimed at developing new materials combining hydroxyapatite with Artemisia absinthium essential oil, in order to avoid postoperative infections. The purpose of this work is to highlight the antimicrobial properties of the Artemisia absinthium essential oil-hydroxyapatite composites obtained by a simple method and at low costs. The structural properties and antimicrobial efficiency of the Artemisia absinthium essential oil-hydroxyapatite composite have been studied. The samples based on Artemisia absinthium essential oil analyzed in this study showed that wormwood essential oil presented the highest efficacy against the fungal strain of C. parapsilosis. It has been shown that wormwood essential oil has a strong antimicrobial effect against the microbial strains tested in this study. Furthermore, the antimicrobial properties of the biocomposites based on hydroxyapatite and essential oil are due to the presence of the essential oil in the samples.Entities:
Keywords: Arthemisia absinthium; antimicrobial properties; hydroxyapatite
Year: 2020 PMID: 31963829 PMCID: PMC7024177 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25020413
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Chemical composition of wormwood essential oils (WW EOs) obtained from dried root parts of Arthemisia absinthium L.
| Compounds | Percentage of Chemical Composition (%) |
|---|---|
| α-Fenchene | 52.29 |
| Sabinene | 7.2 |
| β-Thujene | 6.28 |
| β-myrcene | 5.47 |
| methyl salicylate | 4.2 |
| endo-bornylacetate | 2.21 |
| ϒ-isogeraniol | 1.95 |
| neryl isobutyrate | 1.9 |
| dyhidrocarveol acetate | 1.29 |
| nerol | 1.28 |
| 1,8-Cineole | 1.05 |
| ϒ-Terpinene | 1.05 |
| β-Pinene | 1.02 |
| camphene | tr |
| α-pinene | tr |
| hexanol | tr |
| limonene | tr |
| neryl acetate | tr |
| bornyl isovalerate | tr |
| neryl propionate | tr |
tr*-trace amounts.
Figure 1SEM images of HAp nanoparticles (a); 3D surface plot of SEM images of HAp (b); SEM images of HApWW sample (c); 3D surface plot of SEM images of HApWW sample (d) and AFM 2D and 3D surface topographies of HAp pellet (e,f) and HApWW pellet (g,h).
Figure 2TEM image of HAp (a) and HApWW (c) nanoparticles. Distribution of HAp (b) and HApWW (d) nanoparticles obtained from TEM images.
Figure 3Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements of size dispersion of HAp (black) and HApWW (red) represent data weighted by number (a) and volume (b) of particles.
Figure 4The nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms of HAp (a) and HApWW (b) samples.
Parameters of nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms of HAp and HApWW samples.
| Sample | Single Point Surface Area (nm) | BET Surface Area | Langmuir Surface Area | t-Plot External Surface Area |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAp | 101.12 | 102.54 | 153.50 | 112.10 |
| HApWW | 115.24 | 116.72 | 173.40 | 123.60 |
Figure 5FTIR spectra of the HAp solution (a), WW EO (b) and HApWW (c) samples.
Assignment of IR bands identified in the IR spectra of HAp, WW EO and HApWW.
| HAp Solution IR Band Wavenumber | IR Band Assignment | WW EO IR Band Wavenumber | IR Band Assignment | HApWW IR Band Wavenumber | IR Band Assignment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 588, 602, 633 | vibrations in [PO4]3− | 816, 890 | C-H vibrations | 563, 602, 630 | vibrations in [PO4]3− |
| 1418 | vibrations in [CO3]2− | 1014, 1070, 1108, 1154, 1185,1236 | C-O vibrations | 890 | C-H vibrations |
| 960, 1027, 1090 | vibrations in [PO4]3− | 1375,1449 | C-H vibrations | 960, 1027, 1092 | vibrations in [PO4]3− |
| 1631, 3309 | O-H vibrations | 1516,1589 | C=C-C stretching vibrations | 1375, 1449 | C-H vibrations in CH3 |
| 2140 | 1648 | C=C vibrations | 1648 | C=C vibrations | |
| 1737 | C=O stretching vibrations | 1737 | C=O stretching vibrations | ||
| 2872, 2961 | C-H vibrations in CH3 | 2872, 2961 | C-H vibrations in CH3 | ||
| 2930 | C-H vibrations in CH2 | 2930 | C-H vibrations in CH2 | ||
| 3078 | C-H vibrations | 3078 | C-H vibrations | ||
| 3408 | O-H vibrations | 3377 | O-H vibrations |
MIC and MBC (µl/mL) values for WW EO HApWW, HAp and DMSO.
| Tested EOs | WW EO | HApWW | HAp | DMSO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| MBC 125 | 125 | > 50 | >250 | |
| MBC 125 | 125 | >250 | >250 | |
| MBC 62.5 | 62.5 | >250 | >250 | |
| MBC 62.5 | 62.5 | >250 | >250 | |
| MBC 62.5 | 250 | >250 | >250 | |
| MBC 62.5 | 250 | >250 | >250 | |
| MBC 62.5 | 250 | >250 | >250 | |
| MBC 250 | 250 | >250 | >250 | |
| MBC 7.81 | 15.62 | 250 | >250 |
The percentage of depolarized bacterial cells treated with WWEO and HApWW at MIC values.
| Samples | WW EO | HapWW | Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial Strains | |||
| 9.7% | 0.2% | 0% | |
| 34.2% | 5.4% | 0.1% | |
| 3.5% | 0.9% | 0.6% | |
| 2.1% | 8.2% | 0.3% | |
| 6.4% | 14.1% | 1.3% |