| Literature DB >> 31963757 |
Yuxuan Deng1, Chengyang Cao1, Xiaoqing Liu1,2, Quan Yuan3, Cuixia Feng1, Haoran Shi1, Yao Yang1, Yufeng Wu1.
Abstract
To assess the effect of TDG on the survival of different sizes of pelagic fish, bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) were subjected to TDG supersaturated water at levels of 125, 130, 135, and 140%. The results showed that apparent abnormal behaviours and symptoms of gas bubble disease (GBD) were observed in bighead carp. The survival probability of large and small juvenile bighead carp declined with increasing TDG levels. The median survival time (ST50) values of large juvenile bighead carp were 74.97 and 31.90 h at 130% and 140% TDG, respectively. While the ST50 of small fish were 22.40 and 6.72 h at the same TDG levels. In comparison to the large juvenile bighead carp, the small juvenile bighead carp showed weaker tolerance to TDG supersaturated water. Furthermore, acute lethality experiments after chronic exposure to TDG were initiated to further investigate the effect of TDG on bighead carp. The juveniles were first subjected to 115% TDG supersaturated water for 96 h. After chronic exposure, live fish were immediately transferred to TDG supersaturated water at levels of 125, 130, 135, and 140%. The results demonstrated that no fish died under chronic exposure and few fish exhibited slight GBD symptoms. The ST50 values for bighead carp subjected to acute exposure after chronic exposure were 61.23 and 23.50 h at 130 and 140%, respectively. Compared with the bighead carp subjected to acute exposure, bighead carp subjected to multiple exposures were more vulnerable to TDG.Entities:
Keywords: Bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis); Median survival time (ST50); acute exposure; survival probability; total dissolved gas supersaturation
Year: 2020 PMID: 31963757 PMCID: PMC7022328 DOI: 10.3390/ani10010166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Figure 1Boxplot describes the difference in the weight and fork length between the large juvenile bighead carp and small juvenile bighead carp. (a) The difference in the fork length of the two sizes of bighead carp. (b) The difference in the weights of the two sizes of bighead carp. Asterisks indicate that large juvenile bighead carp are significantly different from the small juvenile bighead carp (****: p < 0.01).
Figure 2Typical symptoms of gas bubble disease (GBD), (a) exophthalmos, (b) bubbles in the gills and (c) haemorrhage on caudal fin.
Figure 3Survival curves of the large and small juvenile bighead carp exposed to five different levels of total dissolved gas (TDG) supersaturated water (100, 125, 130, 135, and 140%). (a) Large juvenile bighead carp; (b) Small juvenile bighead carp. Broken lines indicate the correlation of survival probability and exposure time. The risk table describes the number of test fish threatened by TDG at different exposure times.
Regression coefficients for the accelerated failure time (AFT) model depicting the effects of TDG on the survival (time-to-death) of two different sizes of bighead carp.
| Groups | Factors | Parameters | Estimated Coefficients (Coeff.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coeff. (S.E.) 1 | Walid-Z | Pr(>|Z|) 2 | |||
| Large | Intercept |
| 4.90 (0.24) | 20.73 | <0.01 |
| TDG |
| −0.54 (0.31)130% | −1.75 | 0.08 | |
| −0.70 (0.31)135% | −2.31 | 0.02 | |||
| −1.50 (0.31)140% | −4.93 | <0.01 | |||
| Log (scale) |
| −0.68 (0.12) | −5.73 | <0.01 | |
| Small | Intercept |
| 3.89 (0.19) | 20.69 | <0.01 |
| TDG |
| −0.77 (0.27)130% | −2.91 | <0.01 | |
| −0.99 (0.26)135% | −3.80 | <0.01 | |||
| −1.87 (0.26)140% | −7.19 | <0.01 | |||
| Log (scale) |
| −0.76 (0.09) | −8.09 | <0.01 | |
TDG is considered a categorical variable for the fitting survival data. Asterisks represent significance (*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01); S.E.: standard error.
Acute effect of TDG supersaturation on the median survival time (ST50), and statistical importance of the survival curves of two different sizes of bighead carp.
| Groups | TDG Level | ST50 (h) | Statistical Importance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| df | Chi-square | Pr(>Chi-sq) 1 | |||
| Large | 125% | ||||
| 130% | 74.97 ± 0.81 | 1 | 3.0 | 0.08 | |
| 135% | 68.60 ± 0.61 | 1 | 6.6 | 0.01 | |
| 140% | 31.90 ± 1.31 | 1 | 30.7 | <0.01 | |
| Small | 125% | 54.36 ± 4.16 | |||
| 130% | 22.40 ± 3.19 | 1 | 10.8 | <0.01 | |
| 135% | 16.93 ± 1.65 | 1 | 16.0 | <0.01 | |
| 140% | 6.72 ± 1.46 | 1 | 30.0 | <0.01 | |
Asterisks represent significance (*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01).
Figure 4Survival curves of large juvenile bighead carp exposed to five different levels of TDG supersaturated water (100, 125, 130, 135, and 140%) after chronic exposure (115%). Broken lines indicate the correlation of survival probability and exposure time. The risk table illustrates the number of test fish threatened by TDG at various exposure times.
Regression coefficients for the accelerated failure time (AFT) model depicting the effects of TDG on the survival (time-to-death) of bighead carp.
| Factors | Parameters | Estimated Coefficients (Coeff.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coeff. (S.E.) 1 | Walid-Z | Pr(>|Z|) 2 | ||
| Intercept |
| 4.69 (0.19) | 25.22 | <0.01 |
| TDG |
| −0.64 (0.24)130% | −2.71 | <0.01 |
| −0.92 (0.24)135% | −3.83 | <0.01 | ||
| −1.52 (0.27)140% | −5.75 | <0.01 | ||
| Log (scale) |
| −0.89 (0.10) | −8.74 | <0.01 |
TDG is considered a categorical variable for fitting the survival data. Asterisks represent significance (*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01); S.E.: standard error.
Acute effect of TDG supersaturation after chronic exposure on the median survival time, and statistical importance of the survival curves of bighead carp.
| TDG Level | ST50 (h) | Statistical Importance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| df | Chi-square | Pr(>Chi-sq) 1 | ||
| 125% | ||||
| 130% | 61.23 ± 1.53 | 1 | 16 | <0.01 |
| 135% | 55.50 ± 3.20 | 1 | 19.9 | <0.01 |
| 140% | 23.50 ± 1.25 | 1 | 25.7 | <0.01 |
1 Asterisks represent significance (**: p < 0.01).