| Literature DB >> 31963233 |
Elena Gaudenzi1, Fabrizio Cardone1, Xiaohu Lu2, Francesco Canestrari1.
Abstract
The analysis of fatigue behavior of bituminous binders is a complex issue due to several time-temperature dependent phenomena which interact simultaneously, such as damage accumulation, viscoelasticity, thixotropy, and healing. The present research involves rheological measurements aimed at evaluating the fatigue behavior and compares the self-healing capability of two plain bitumen and a bio-binder obtained by partially replacing one of the plain bitumen with a renewable bio-oil. Healing potential was assessed by means of an experimental approach previously implemented for modified bitumen and bituminous mastic and based on the use of a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). The effects of some variables such as bitumen type, bio-oil addition, and aging on the healing potential of binders were taken into account. Results showed that the above-mentioned method for healing analysis is also suitable for conventional and bio-add binders. Outcomes of the experimental investigation highlight that fatigue and self-healing are mainly dependent on binder consistency and also affected by aging. Finally, the addition of bio-oil may induce even better performances in terms of healing potential compared to conventional bitumen, especially in aged condition.Entities:
Keywords: bio-binder; bitumen; fatigue; self-healing
Year: 2020 PMID: 31963233 PMCID: PMC7013438 DOI: 10.3390/ma13020420
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Basic characteristics of investigated binders [19].
| Sample | Condition | Penetration | Softening Point |
|---|---|---|---|
| B.50/70 | unaged | 52 | 49.7 |
| aged | 25 | 64.1 | |
| B.50/70 + A10 | unaged | 114 | 43.5 |
| aged | 39 | 56.7 | |
| B.115 | unaged | 110 | 40.8 |
| aged | 37 | 55.8 |
Figure 1Master curves of investigated bitumen in (a) unaged and (b) aged conditions.
Figure 2Evolution of versus number of loading cycles: General results.
Figure 3Self-healing contribution versus number of rest periods.
Variation of γLVE for each material at each temperature and percentage variation due to aging.
| Material | Condition | 30 °C | 25 °C | 20 °C | 15 °C | 10 °C | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| γLVE | Δγ | γLVE | Δγ | γLVE | Δγ | γLVE | Δγ | γLVE | Δγ | ||
| B.50/70 | unaged | 2.7 | 15 | 2.5 | 20 | 2.2 | 23 | 1.6 | 0 | 1.4 | −7 |
| aged | 2.3 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | ||||||
| B.50/70 + A10 | unaged | 5.7 | 49 | 4.3 | 44 | 3.0 | 33 | 2.0 | 10 | 1.8 | 10 |
| aged | 2.9 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 | ||||||
| B.115 | unaged | 5.7 | 49 | 3.9 | 38 | 3.1 | 32 | 2.4 | 29 | 1.8 | 10 |
| aged | 2.9 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.6 | ||||||
Figure 4Typical isochrone test results.
Temperatures guarantying the iso-stiffness condition.
| | | Tisostiffness (°C) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B.50/70 | B.50/70 + A10 | B.115 | ||||
| Unaged | Aged | Unaged | Aged | Unaged | Aged | |
| 1.0 | 36.7 | 46.3 | 29.1 | 39.2 | 28.0 | 38.4 |
| 3.0 | 28.3 | 35.7 | 22.0 | 29.5 | 20.9 | 29.0 |
| 6.0 | 23.0 | 29.0 | 17.6 | 23.3 | 16.4 | 23.0 |
| 9.0 | 19.8 | 25.1 | 14.9 | 19.7 | 13.8 | 19.6 |
| 12.0 | 17.6 | 22.3 | 13.1 | 17.2 | 11.9 | 17.1 |
Testing parameters for healing analysis.
| Material | Test Conditions | Unaged | Aged | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| γheal | T | | | γheal | T | | | ||
| B.50/70 | Iso-stiffness | 3 | 28 | 3 | 3 | 35 | 3 |
| Iso-thermal | 3 | 25 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 25 | 10.4 | |
| B.50/70 + A10 | Iso-stiffness | 4 | 22.3 | 3 | 3.5 | 29.6 | 3 |
| Iso-thermal | 5 | 25 | 1.7 | 3 | 25 | 5.4 | |
| B.115 | isostiffness | 4 | 22.5 | 3 | 3.5 | 28.6 | 3 |
| isothermal | 5 | 25 | 1.6 | 3 | 25 | 5.2 | |
Figure 5Comparison among unaged binders in (a) iso-stiffness and (b) iso-thermal conditions in terms of evolution of versus number of loading cycles.
Figure 6Comparison among aged binders in (a) iso-stiffness and (b) iso-thermal condition in terms of evolution of versus number of loading cycles.
Healing parameters in iso-stiffness conditions ( = 3 MPa).
| Materials | Condition | γheal (%) | T (°C) | N0 | NfH | n95 | ΔN∞ | Nfat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B.50/70 | unaged | 3.0 | 27.7 | 14,950 | 282 | 1.43 | 1355 | 15,232 |
| aged | 3.0 | 35.0 | 34,350 | 2182 | 3.74 | 980 | 36,532 | |
| B.50/70 + A10 | unaged | 4.0 | 22.5 | 7480 | 190 | 1.65 | 715 | 7670 |
| aged | 3.5 | 29.6 | 19,380 | 1424 | 3.20 | 640 | 20,804 | |
| B.115 | unaged | 4.0 | 21.7 | 7190 | 202 | 1.59 | 720 | 7392 |
| aged | 3.5 | 28.6 | 21,070 | 705 | 2.43 | 650 | 21,775 |
Healing parameters in iso-thermal conditions (T = 25 °C).
| Materials | Condition | γheal (%) | | | N0 | NfH | n95 | ΔN∞ | Nfat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B.50/70 | unaged | 3.0 | 5.4 | 14,320 | 280 | 0.36 | 620 | 14,600 |
| aged | 2.5 | 10.4 | 62,640 | 2802 | 4.86 | 560 | 65,442 | |
| B.50/70 + A10 | unaged | 5.0 | 2.0 | 3970 | 188 | 0.74 | 810 | 4158 |
| aged | 3.0 | 5.4 | 24,210 | 1891 | 3.61 | 420 | 26,101 | |
| B.115 | unaged | 5.0 | 1.9 | 4350 | 120.5 | 1.46 | 880 | 4471 |
| aged | 3.0 | 4.9 | 34,030 | 1509 | 2.71 | 630 | 35,539 |
Figure 7Model parameters for all investigated binders in iso-stiffness condition.
Figure 8Model parameters for all investigated binders in iso-thermal condition.
Figure 9Healing index (HI) results at each testing conditions.