| Literature DB >> 31963170 |
Qinlin Xiao1,2, Xiulin Bai1,2, Yong He1,2.
Abstract
Color index and water content are important indicators for evaluating the quality of fresh-cut potato tuber slices. In this study, hyperspectral imaging combined with multivariate analysis was used to detect the color parameters (L*, a*, b*, Browning index (BI), L*/b*) and water content of fresh-cut potato tuber slices. The successive projections algorithm (SPA) and competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) were used to extract characteristic wavelengths, partial least squares (PLS) and least squares support vector machine (LS-SVM) were utilized to establish regression models. For color prediction, R2c, R2p and RPD of all the LSSVM models established for the five color indicators L*, a*, b*, BI, L*/b* were exceeding 0.90, 0.84 and 2.1, respectively. For water content prediction, R2c, R2p, and RPD of the LSSVM models were over 0.80, 0.77 and 1.9, respectively. LS-SVM model based on full spectra was used to reappear the spatial distribution of color and water content in fresh-cut potato tuber slices by pseudo-color imaging since it performed best in most cases. The results illustrated that hyperspectral imaging could be an effective method for color and water content prediction, which could provide solid theoretical basis for subsequent grading and processing of fresh-cut potato tuber slices.Entities:
Keywords: browning; color index; fresh-cut potato tuber slices; hyperspectral imaging; water content
Year: 2020 PMID: 31963170 PMCID: PMC7022740 DOI: 10.3390/foods9010094
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Statistical information of potato tuber slices in the calibration and prediction sets.
| Indicator | Sample Set | Number | Range | Mean | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cal a | 156 | 43.794–64.738 | 57.548 | 3.328 | |
| Pre a | 78 | 45.497–64.681 | 57.561 | 3.301 | |
| Cal | 156 | −3.096–+2.050 | −1.277 | 1.308 | |
| Pre | 78 | −3.045–+1.886 | −1.278 | 1.31 | |
| Cal | 156 | 11.247–20.681 | 15.703 | 1.98 | |
| Pre | 78 | 11.581–20.567 | 15.704 | 1.977 | |
| BI | Cal | 156 | 22.720–37.097 | 29.106 | 3.343 |
| Pre | 78 | 22.752–36.278 | 29.104 | 3.357 | |
| Cal | 156 | 2.921–4.401 | 3.696 | 0.315 | |
| Pre | 78 | 3.011–4.248 | 3.696 | 0.312 | |
| water content | Cal | 156 | 0.753–0.879 | 0.811 | 0.0209 |
| Pre | 78 | 0.758–0.876 | 0.811 | 0.021 |
a: Cal represents the calibration set, Pre represents the prediction set.
Figure 1Reflectance spectra of fresh-cut potato tuber slices.
Prediction results of L*, a*, b*, BI, L*/b* value by partial least squares (PLS) and least squares support vector machine (LS-SVM) models using full spectra, wavelengths selected by successive projections algorithm (SPA) and competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS).
| Models | Data Type | N.V. b | Calibration | Validation | Prediction | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2c | RMSEC | SDC | R2cv | RMSECV | SDCV | R2p | RMSEP | SDP | RPD | |||
| PLS | Full | 370 | 0.841 | 1.324 | 3.051 | 0.816 | 1.562 | 2.894 | 0.738 | 1.710 | 3.007 | 1.758 |
| SPA | 23 | 0.838 | 1.333 | 3.047 | 0.802 | 1.622 | 2.717 | 0.736 | 1.723 | 2.993 | 1.736 | |
| CARS | 43 | 0.907 | 1.013 | 3.169 | 0.870 | 1.316 | 2.848 | 0.801 | 1.470 | 2.919 | 1.985 | |
| LSSVM | Full | 370 | 0.938 | 0.827 | 3.174 | 0.814 | 1.437 | 3.126 | 0.858 | 1.298 | 3.010 | 2.319 |
| SPA | 23 | 0.937 | 0.832 | 3.177 | 0.828 | 1.377 | 3.116 | 0.848 | 1.336 | 2.913 | 2.181 | |
| CARS | 43 | 0.932 | 0.865 | 3.165 | 0.834 | 1.353 | 3.089 | 0.851 | 1.305 | 3.061 | 2.345 | |
| PLS | Full | 370 | 0.943 | 0.312 | 1.270 | 0.947 | 0.335 | 1.247 | 0.945 | 0.312 | 1.272 | 4.078 |
| SPA | 15 | 0.928 | 0.351 | 1.260 | 0.931 | 0.381 | 1.255 | 0.941 | 0.318 | 1.255 | 3.949 | |
| CARS | 24 | 0.946 | 0.304 | 1.272 | 0.949 | 0.326 | 1.251 | 0.954 | 0.283 | 1.254 | 4.428 | |
| LSSVM | Full | 370 | 0.976 | 0.201 | 1.281 | 0.949 | 0.294 | 1.276 | 0.956 | 0.274 | 1.289 | 4.704 |
| SPA | 15 | 0.964 | 0.248 | 1.277 | 0.950 | 0.290 | 1.275 | 0.957 | 0.271 | 1.284 | 4.731 | |
| CARS | 24 | 0.966 | 0.239 | 1.281 | 0.950 | 0.292 | 1.279 | 0.957 | 0.272 | 1.275 | 4.686 | |
| PLS | Full | 370 | 0.887 | 0.663 | 1.865 | 0.858 | 0.825 | 1.674 | 0.881 | 0.689 | 1.949 | 2.827 |
| SPA | 21 | 0.899 | 0.628 | 1.877 | 0.862 | 0.816 | 1.695 | 0.887 | 0.679 | 1.982 | 2.918 | |
| CARS | 24 | 0.929 | 0.526 | 1.908 | 0.910 | 0.658 | 1.839 | 0.900 | 0.623 | 1.874 | 3.008 | |
| LSSVM | Full | 370 | 0.962 | 0.383 | 1.930 | 0.909 | 0.597 | 1.938 | 0.924 | 0.546 | 1.942 | 3.560 |
| SPA | 21 | 0.941 | 0.481 | 1.913 | 0.912 | 0.587 | 1.908 | 0.922 | 0.556 | 1.923 | 3.461 | |
| CARS | 24 | 0.959 | 0.399 | 1.927 | 0.909 | 0.597 | 1.920 | 0.924 | 0.548 | 1.895 | 3.457 | |
| BI value prediction | ||||||||||||
| PLS | Full | 370 | 0.911 | 0.993 | 3.191 | 0.896 | 1.197 | 3.068 | 0.898 | 1.083 | 3.364 | 3.107 |
| SPA | 17 | 0.887 | 1.121 | 3.148 | 0.862 | 1.379 | 3.030 | 0.887 | 1.141 | 3.333 | 2.920 | |
| CARS | 25 | 0.902 | 1.045 | 3.174 | 0.884 | 1.263 | 3.034 | 0.890 | 1.125 | 3.351 | 2.978 | |
| LSSVM | Full | 370 | 0.958 | 0.685 | 3.248 | 0.924 | 0.922 | 3.231 | 0.940 | 0.823 | 3.328 | 4.047 |
| SPA | 17 | 0.950 | 0.742 | 3.242 | 0.923 | 0.924 | 3.243 | 0.932 | 0.875 | 3.353 | 3.831 | |
| CARS | 25 | 0.958 | 0.686 | 3.256 | 0.932 | 0.869 | 3.244 | 0.929 | 0.899 | 3.297 | 3.669 | |
| PLS | Full | 370 | 0.904 | 0.097 | 0.299 | 0.885 | 0.118 | 0.289 | 0.872 | 0.114 | 0.300 | 2.634 |
| SPA | 18 | 0.915 | 0.092 | 0.301 | 0.905 | 0.107 | 0.289 | 0.883 | 0.111 | 0.299 | 2.706 | |
| CARS | 30 | 0.938 | 0.078 | 0.305 | 0.928 | 0.093 | 0.294 | 0.929 | 0.087 | 0.296 | 3.390 | |
| LSSVM | Full | 370 | 0.957 | 0.065 | 0.305 | 0.919 | 0.089 | 0.305 | 0.947 | 0.073 | 0.292 | 4.023 |
| SPA | 18 | 0.954 | 0.068 | 0.305 | 0.922 | 0.088 | 0.305 | 0.948 | 0.072 | 0.293 | 4.093 | |
| CARS | 30 | 0.948 | 0.072 | 0.304 | 0.927 | 0.085 | 0.304 | 0.940 | 0.078 | 0.299 | 3.847 | |
b: N.V. is the number of variables. SDC, SDCV, SDP: Standard deviation of the predicted values of the calibration set, validation set, and prediction set.
Prediction results of water content by PLS and LS-SVM models using full spectra, wavelengths selected by SPA and CARS.
| Models | Data Type | N.V. b | Calibration | Validation | Prediction | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2c | RMSEC | SDC | R2cv | RMSECV | SDCV | R2p | RMSEP | SDP | RPD | |||
| PLS | Full | 370 | 0.777 | 0.010 | 0.018 | 0.620 | 0.014 | 0.018 | 0.718 | 0.011 | 0.020 | 1.781 |
| SPA | 20 | 0.751 | 0.010 | 0.018 | 0.624 | 0.014 | 0.017 | 0.719 | 0.011 | 0.019 | 1.675 | |
| CARS | 22 | 0.788 | 0.010 | 0.019 | 0.692 | 0.013 | 0.017 | 0.721 | 0.011 | 0.019 | 1.700 | |
| LSSVM | Full | 370 | 0.812 | 0.009 | 0.018 | 0.692 | 0.012 | 0.018 | 0.778 | 0.010 | 0.020 | 2.006 |
| SPA | 20 | 0.803 | 0.009 | 0.018 | 0.653 | 0.012 | 0.019 | 0.794 | 0.010 | 0.019 | 2.018 | |
| CARS | 22 | 0.825 | 0.009 | 0.018 | 0.713 | 0.011 | 0.019 | 0.791 | 0.010 | 0.019 | 1.978 | |
b: N.V. is the number of variables. SDC, SDCV, SDP: Standard deviation of the predicted values of the calibration set, validation set, and prediction set.
Figure 2Pixel-wise prediction maps developed on the CARS-LS-SVM models for color visualization (P* is the predicted average value of all pixels; T* is the actual value measured by the chromatic aberration method).
Figure 3Pixel-wise prediction maps developed on the CARS-LS-SVM models for water content visualization (P* is the predicted average value of all pixels; T* is the actual value measured by the chromatic aberration method).