Literature DB >> 31961703

The Concept of Sport Sampling Versus Sport Specialization: Preventing Youth Athlete Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Seth L Carder1, Nicolas E Giusti1, Lisa M Vopat1, Armin Tarakemeh1, Jordan Baker1, Bryan G Vopat1, Mary K Mulcahey2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of youth athletes specializing in 1 sport has been increasing over the past decade. Subsequently, the rate of youth athlete injury has also been increasing. It is possible that an association exists between youth specialization and sports injury rate.
PURPOSE: To determine if sport sampling is associated with a lower sports injury rate in youths compared with youths who specialize in 1 sport. STUDY
DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library. Inclusion criteria included studies written in the English language, studies with athletes between 7 and 18 years of age, studies that report injury rates, and studies that specify if athletes were sport samplers or specialized in a sport. Data relevant to this study, including injuries and patient characteristics, were extracted and statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: The initial search identified 324 studies, 6 of which met inclusion criteria. From these 6 studies, the total participant number was 5736. Of those, 2451 (42.7%) were "sport samplers," 1628 (28.4%) were "sport specializers," and 1657 (28.9%) were considered "others" (ie, could not be classified as true samplers or true specializers). The average age of all the athletes was 14.6 years (range, 7-18 years). Sport specializers had a significantly higher injury risk than the sport samplers (RR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.19-1.57; P < .0001). There was a higher risk of injury in the "others" group when compared with the "sport sampler" group (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14-1.29; P < .0001). There was a higher risk of injury in the "sport specializer" group over the "others" group (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.14; P < .005).
CONCLUSION: Sport sampling is associated with a decreased risk of sports injury in youth athletes when compared with those who specialize in 1 sport. Injury rates increase as a youth athlete becomes increasingly specialized. Youth athletes would benefit substantially from participating in sport sampling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescent injury; adolescent musculoskeletal injury; adolescent overuse injury; sport sampling; sport specialization

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31961703     DOI: 10.1177/0363546519899380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  11 in total

1.  Further Muddying the Waters? A Comment on Bell et al's 2021 Definition of Youth Sport Specialization.

Authors:  Arne Güllich; Brooke N Macnamara; Michael Barth; David Z Hambrick
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  The Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence among Adolescent Female Athletes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tamara Rial Rebullido; Cinta Gómez-Tomás; Avery D Faigenbaum; Iván Chulvi-Medrano
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2021-01-28

3.  Predictive Value of Technical Throwing Skills on Nomination Status in Youth and Long-Term Career Attainment in Handball.

Authors:  Till Koopmann; Franziska Lath; Dirk Büsch; Jörg Schorer
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-01-14

4.  Sport Specialization, Physical Performance and Injury History in Canadian Junior High School Students.

Authors:  Chris Whatman; Carla van den Berg; Luz Palacios-Derflingher; Carolyn Emery
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-11-02

Review 5.  A Comprehensive Summary of Systematic Reviews on Sports Injury Prevention Strategies.

Authors:  Samuel D Stephenson; Joseph W Kocan; Amrit V Vinod; Melissa A Kluczynski; Leslie J Bisson
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-28

Review 6.  Revisiting Early Sport Specialization: What's the Problem?

Authors:  Alexandra Mosher; Kevin Till; Jessica Fraser-Thomas; Joseph Baker
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  Effects of Pre-Collegiate Sport Specialization on Cognitive, Postural, and Psychological Functions: Findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium.

Authors:  Tsung-Yeh Chou; Jaclyn B Caccese; Yu-Lun Huang; Joseph J Glutting; Thomas A Buckley; Steven P Broglio; Thomas W McAllister; Michael A McCrea; Paul F Pasquina; Thomas W Kaminski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Predictors of Junior Versus Senior Elite Performance are Opposite: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Participation Patterns.

Authors:  Michael Barth; Arne Güllich; Brooke N Macnamara; David Z Hambrick
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 11.928

9.  A Comparison of Pitching Biomechanics and Sport Specialization in High School Pitchers.

Authors:  Tyler J Hamer; Adam B Rosen; Samuel J Wilkins; Kristen F Nicholson; Garrett S Bullock; Brian A Knarr
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-08-01

10.  Socioeconomic Inequities in Youth Participation in Physical Activity and Sports.

Authors:  Pooja S Tandon; Emily Kroshus; Katharine Olsen; Kimberly Garrett; Pingping Qu; Julie McCleery
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.