Literature DB >> 31960614

Effect of Therapy on Radiographic Progression in Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Paras Karmacharya1, Ali Duarte-Garcia1, Maureen Dubreuil2, M Hassan Murad1, Ravi Shahukhal3, Pragya Shrestha1, Elena Myasoedova1, Cynthia S Crowson1, Kerry Wright1, John M Davis1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of therapies on radiographic progression in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA).
METHODS: A comprehensive database search for studies assessing radiographic progression in axial SpA (particular treatment versus no treatment of interest) was performed. Study-specific standardized mean differences in treatment outcomes at 2 and ≥4 years were estimated and combined using random-effects models.
RESULTS: Twenty-four studies in patients with axial SpA were identified, of which 18 involved tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), 8 involved nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and 1 involved secukinumab. Spinal radiographic progression, as measured by the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS), was not significantly different between TNFi-treated and biologics-naive patients at 2 years (mSASSS difference -0.73 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -1.52, 0.12], I2 = 28%) and ≥4 years (mSASSS difference -2.03 [95% CI -4.63, 0.72], I2 = 63%). Sensitivity analyses restricted to studies with a low risk of bias showed a significant difference in spinal radiographic progression between TNFi-treated and biologics-naive patients at ≥4 years (mSASSS difference -2.17 [95% CI -4.19, -0.15]). No significant difference in spinal radiographic progression was observed between NSAID-treated and control patients (mSASSS difference -0.30 [95% CI -2.62, 1.31], I2 = 71%) or between secukinumab-treated and biologics-naive patients (mSASSS difference -0.34 [95% CI -0.85, 0.17]). With regard to treatment differences in patients with nonradiographic axial SpA or in patients with radiographic progression measured using the sacroiliac joint score, an insufficient number of studies were available for analysis.
CONCLUSION: Although no significant protective effect of TNFi treatment on spinal radiographic progression was seen over the course of 2 years or ≥4 years in patients with axial SpA, our analysis restricted to studies with a low risk of bias showed a protective effect of TNFi after ≥4 years. Therefore, long-term TNFi exposure might confer beneficial effects on spinal radiographic progression in axial SpA. No difference in radiographic progression at 2 years was seen in either the NSAID or secukinumab treatment groups compared to their controls. Future studies should explore the effects of biologic treatment on radiographic progression, as well as the effects of long-term biologics exposure, in patients with early axial SpA or those with nonradiographic axial SpA.
© 2020, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31960614      PMCID: PMC7218689          DOI: 10.1002/art.41206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol        ISSN: 2326-5191            Impact factor:   10.995


  58 in total

1.  Continuous NSAID use reverts the effects of inflammation on radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Féline Kroon; Robert Landewé; Maxime Dougados; Désirée van der Heijde
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Comparison of the Effects of Secukinumab and Adalimumab Biosimilar on Radiographic Progression in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: Design of a Randomized, Phase IIIb Study (SURPASS).

Authors:  Xenofon Baraliakos; Mikkel Østergaard; Lianne S Gensler; Denis Poddubnyy; Eun Young Lee; Uta Kiltz; Ruvie Martin; Hiroshi Sawata; Aimee Readie; Brian Porter
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Low-dose CT detects more progression of bone formation in comparison to conventional radiography in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results from the SIAS cohort.

Authors:  Anoek de Koning; Freek de Bruin; Rosaline van den Berg; Sofia Ramiro; Xenofon Baraliakos; Juergen Braun; Floris A van Gaalen; Monique Reijnierse; Désirée van der Heijde
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Early detection of sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent development of sacroiliitis on plain radiography. A prospective, longitudinal study.

Authors:  J Oostveen; R Prevo; J den Boer; M van de Laar
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on radiographic spinal progression in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort.

Authors:  Denis Poddubnyy; Martin Rudwaleit; Hildrun Haibel; Joachim Listing; Elisabeth Märker-Hermann; Henning Zeidler; Jürgen Braun; Joachim Sieper
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Effect of secukinumab on clinical and radiographic outcomes in ankylosing spondylitis: 2-year results from the randomised phase III MEASURE 1 study.

Authors:  Jürgen Braun; Xenofon Baraliakos; Atul Deodhar; Dominique Baeten; Joachim Sieper; Paul Emery; Aimee Readie; Ruvie Martin; Shephard Mpofu; Hanno B Richards
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Functional relevance of radiographic spinal progression in axial spondyloarthritis: results from the GErman SPondyloarthritis Inception Cohort.

Authors:  Denis Poddubnyy; Joachim Listing; Hildrun Haibel; Sven Knüppel; Martin Rudwaleit; Joachim Sieper
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range.

Authors:  Xiang Wan; Wenqian Wang; Jiming Liu; Tiejun Tong
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Spinal radiographic progression over 2 years in ankylosing spondylitis patients treated with secukinumab: a historical cohort comparison.

Authors:  J Braun; H Haibel; M de Hooge; R Landewé; M Rudwaleit; T Fox; A Readie; H B Richards; B Porter; R Martin; D Poddubnyy; J Sieper; D van der Heijde
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Impact of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Versus Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drug Treatment on Radiographic Progression in Early Ankylosing Spondylitis: Its Relationship to Inflammation Control During Treatment.

Authors:  Jun Won Park; Min Jung Kim; Jeong Seok Lee; You-Jung Ha; Jin Kyun Park; Eun Ha Kang; Yun Jong Lee; Yeong Wook Song; Eun Young Lee
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 10.995

View more
  13 in total

1.  Identifying trajectories of radiographic spinal disease in ankylosing spondylitis: a 15-year follow-up study of the PSOAS cohort.

Authors:  Mark C Hwang; MinJae Lee; Lianne S Gensler; Matthew A Brown; Amirali Tahanan; Mohammad H Rahbar; Theresa Hunter; Mingyan Shan; Mariko L Ishimori; John D Reveille; Michael H Weisman; Thomas J Learch
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 7.046

Review 2.  [Chronic back pain in axial spondylarthritis : Current diagnostic challenges and treatment possibilities].

Authors:  Burkhard Möller
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 1.530

3.  Age-stratified trends in the progression of spinal radiographic damage in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Tae-Han Lee; Bon San Koo; Bora Nam; Yun Jin Kim; Donghee Son; Seunghun Lee; Kyung Bin Joo; Tae-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.625

4.  Conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs therapy may not slow spinal radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis: results from an 18-year longitudinal dataset.

Authors:  Tae-Han Lee; Bon San Koo; Bora Nam; Ji Seon Oh; Seo Young Park; Seunghun Lee; Kyung Bin Joo; Tae-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 5.  Educational needs and challenges in axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Anand Kumthekar; Mohamad Bittar; Maureen Dubreuil
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.941

Review 6.  Treatment of axial spondyloarthritis: an update.

Authors:  Abhijeet Danve; Atul Deodhar
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 32.286

7.  Impact of tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors on MRI inflammation in axial spondyloarthritis assessed by Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium Canada score: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yupeng Huang; Yuehong Chen; Tao Liu; Sang Lin; Geng Yin; Qibing Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Autoantibodies against Protein Phosphatase Magnesium-Dependent 1A as a Biomarker for Predicting Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis Treated with Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents.

Authors:  Jung-Sun Lee; Eun-Ju Lee; Jae-Hyun Lee; Seok-Chan Hong; Chang-Keun Lee; Bin Yoo; Ji-Seon Oh; Sang-Hoon Lee; Tae-Jong Kim; Seung-Hun Lee; Sung-Sin Jo; Dae-Hyun Yoo; Ye-Soo Park; Tae-Hwan Kim; Yong-Gil Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Loss and gain of bone in spondyloarthritis: what drives these opposing clinical features?

Authors:  Gavin Clunie; Nicole Horwood
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.346

10.  Treatment strategies in axial spondyloarthritis: what, when and how?

Authors:  George E Fragoulis; Stefan Siebert
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 7.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.