Giulia Balboni1, Cristina Mumbardó-Adam2,3,4, Alessandra Coscarelli5. 1. Department of Philosophy, Social and Human Sciences and Education, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. 2. University Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain. 3. Open University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain. 4. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 5. University of Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the role of adaptive behaviour, individual variables (age, gender and problem behaviours) and environmental variables (living arrangements, employment status and city dimension) in affecting the quality of life of individuals with IDD measured from third-party (caregiver) and individuals with IDD' perspective. METHOD: For 93 adults with an IDD diagnosis (47% males) aged 19-65 years, third-party and participants' perspective on participants' quality of life (Personal Outcome Scale), adaptive behaviour (Vineland-II scale), problem behaviours (PIMRA and DASH-II scales), and individual and environmental variables were collected. RESULTS: Adaptive behaviour was the main determinant of quality of life for individuals with IDD. The effect of adaptive behaviour was significant and relevant from both third-party and participants' perspectives. Problem behaviours had a modest negative impact on the quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive behaviour is relevant for planning support and interventions for people with IDD to increase their quality of life.
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the role of adaptive behaviour, individual variables (age, gender and problem behaviours) and environmental variables (living arrangements, employment status and city dimension) in affecting the quality of life of individuals with IDD measured from third-party (caregiver) and individuals with IDD' perspective. METHOD: For 93 adults with an IDD diagnosis (47% males) aged 19-65 years, third-party and participants' perspective on participants' quality of life (Personal Outcome Scale), adaptive behaviour (Vineland-II scale), problem behaviours (PIMRA and DASH-II scales), and individual and environmental variables were collected. RESULTS: Adaptive behaviour was the main determinant of quality of life for individuals with IDD. The effect of adaptive behaviour was significant and relevant from both third-party and participants' perspectives. Problem behaviours had a modest negative impact on the quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive behaviour is relevant for planning support and interventions for people with IDD to increase their quality of life.
Authors: Kristina Bartakovicova; Petra Kemenyova; Ivan Belica; Zofia Janik Szapuova; Katarina Stebelova; Iveta Waczulikova; Daniela Ostatnikova; Katarina Babinska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Laura Esteban; Patricia Navas; Miguel Ángel Verdugo; Víctor B Arias Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 3.390