Literature DB >> 31960121

Gender stereotypes and incremental beliefs in STEM and non-STEM students in three countries: relationships with performance in cognitive tasks.

Angelica Moè1, Markus Hausmann2, Marco Hirnstein3.   

Abstract

Women's underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) has been linked, among others, to gender stereotypes and ability-related beliefs as well as gender differences in specific cognitive abilities. However, the bulk of studies focused on gender stereotypes related to mathematics. The present study, therefore, aimed to map gender stereotypes and incremental beliefs (i.e., the conviction about modifiability) with respect to a wide range of stereotypical male-favouring and female-favouring abilities. Gender stereotypes and incremental beliefs were assessed with self-report questionnaires in 132 STEM students (65 women) and 124 non-STEM students (73 women) in three European countries ranked in the top, middle, and bottom of the Global Gender Gap Report. Moreover, a mental rotation and a verbal fluency test were completed. Men endorsed male-favouring stereotypes more than women, and women endorsed female-favouring stereotypes more than men, an effect that was most pronounced in the country with the larger gender gap. Male STEM students endorsed male-favouring stereotypes more strongly than male non-STEM and female STEM students. Male non-STEM students endorsed female-favouring stereotypes less than female and male STEM students. Female STEM students reported higher incremental beliefs than female non-STEM students, especially in the country with the lowest gender gap. Men outperformed women, and STEM students outperformed non-STEM in mental rotation, while women outperformed men in verbal fluency. Male STEM students' stronger endorsement of male-favouring stereotypes might reflect genuine group differences, at least in mental rotation. While potentially such gender stereotypes can help creating a "chilly climate" where women in academic STEM degrees are expected to perform poorly, those women believed more in the possibility to change and improve in male-favouring abilities which could help them to overcome the potential negative effect of stereotyping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31960121     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01285-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  26 in total

1.  Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention.

Authors:  Lisa S Blackwell; Kali H Trzesniewski; Carol Sorich Dweck
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

2.  Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.

Authors:  Stephen J Ceci; Donna K Ginther; Shulamit Kahn; Wendy M Williams
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2014-12

3.  Stereotypes and steroids: using a psychobiosocial model to understand cognitive sex differences.

Authors:  D F Halpern; U Tan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Sex differences and individual differences in cognitive performance and their relationship to endogenous gonadal hormones and gonadotropins.

Authors:  Rozmin Halari; Melissa Hines; Veena Kumari; Ravi Mehrotra; Mike Wheeler; Virginia Ng; Tonmoy Sharma
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Math-gender stereotypes in elementary school children.

Authors:  Dario Cvencek; Andrew N Meltzoff; Anthony G Greenwald
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2011-03-09

6.  The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: a cluster randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Molly Carnes; Patricia G Devine; Linda Baier Manwell; Angela Byars-Winston; Eve Fine; Cecilia E Ford; Patrick Forscher; Carol Isaac; Anna Kaatz; Wairimu Magua; Mari Palta; Jennifer Sheridan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Sex differences in episodic memory: the impact of verbal and visuospatial ability.

Authors:  A Herlitz; E Airaksinen; E Nordström
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Digit ratio (2D:4D) and the spatial representation of magnitude.

Authors:  Rebecca Bull; Philip J Benson
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  Interactive effects of sex hormones and gender stereotypes on cognitive sex differences--a psychobiosocial approach.

Authors:  Markus Hausmann; Daniela Schoofs; Harriet E S Rosenthal; Kirsten Jordan
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 4.905

Review 10.  Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations.

Authors:  Stephen J Ceci; Wendy M Williams; Susan M Barnett
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  4 in total

1.  STEM-Gender Stereotypes: Associations With School Empowerment and School Engagement Among Italian and Nigerian Adolescents.

Authors:  Pasquale Musso; Maria Beatrice Ligorio; Ebere Ibe; Susanna Annese; Cristina Semeraro; Rosalinda Cassibba
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-06

2.  Architectures of contemporary digital platforms in education: analysis of exclusion processes.

Authors:  Inés María González Vidal
Journal:  Univers Access Inf Soc       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Children's Gender Stereotypes in STEM Following a One-Shot Growth Mindset Intervention in a Science Museum.

Authors:  Fidelia Law; Luke McGuire; Mark Winterbottom; Adam Rutland
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-10

4.  The Place of Gender Stereotypes in the Network of Cognitive Abilities, Self-Perceived Ability and Intrinsic Value of School in School Children Depending on Sex and Preferences in STEM.

Authors:  Victoria Ismatullina; Timofey Adamovich; Ilya Zakharov; Georgy Vasin; Ivan Voronin
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.