Literature DB >> 31959673

Evidence too weak to guide surgical treatment decisions for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review of the risk of new meniscal tears after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Guri Ranum Ekås1,2,3, Clare L Ardern4,5,6, Hege Grindem3,7, Lars Engebretsen8,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of new meniscal tears after treatment for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, in children and adults with and without ACL reconstruction.
DESIGN: Prognosis systematic review (PROSPERO registration number CRD42016036788).
METHODS: We searched Embase, Ovid Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PEDro and Google Scholar from inception to 3rd May 2018. Eligible articles included patients with ACL injury (diagnosis confirmed by MRI and/or diagnostic arthroscopy), reported the number of meniscal tears at the time of ACL injury diagnosis/start of treatment and reported the number of new meniscal tears that subsequently occurred. Articles with fewer than 20 patients at follow-up, and articles limited to ACL revision surgery or multi-ligament knee injuries were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened articles, assessed eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We judged the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group methodology.
RESULTS: Of 75 studies included in the systematic review, 54 studies with 9624 patients and 501 new meniscal tears were appropriate for quantitative analysis. Heterogeneity precluded data pooling. The risk of new meniscal tears was 0%-21% when follow-up was <2 years, 0%-29% when follow-up was 2 to 5 years, 5%-52% when follow-up was 5 to 10 years and 4%-31% when follow-up was longer than 10 years. The proportion of studies with high risk of selection, misclassification and detection bias was 84%, 69% and 68%, respectively. Certainty of evidence was very low.
CONCLUSION: New meniscal tears occurred in 0%-52% of patients between 4 months and 20 years (mean 4.9±4.4 years) following treatment for ACL injury. The certainty of evidence was too low to guide surgical treatment decisions. This review cannot conclude that the incidence of new meniscal tears is lower if ACL injury is treated with surgery compared with treatment with rehabilitation only. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL injury; ACL injury treatment; ACL reconstruction; active rehabilitation; non-operative treatment; non-surgical treatment; physiotherapy; rehabilitation; secondary meniscal injury

Year:  2020        PMID: 31959673     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  5 in total

1.  Hamstrings substitution via anteromedial portal with optional anterolateral ligament reconstruction is the preferred surgical technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a survey among ESSKA members.

Authors:  Alberto Vascellari; Alberto Grassi; Gian Luigi Canata; Stefano Zaffagnini; Alli Gokeler; Henrique Jones
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Clinical, Functional, and Physical Activity Outcomes 5 Years Following the Treatment Algorithm of the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marie Pedersen; Hege Grindem; Jessica L Johnson; Lars Engebretsen; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 6.558

3.  Decision Making for Treatment After ACL Injury From an Orthopaedic Surgeon and Patient Perspective: Results From the NACOX Study.

Authors:  Hanna Tigerstrand Grevnerts; Sofi Sonesson; Håkan Gauffin; Clare L Ardern; Anders Stålman; Joanna Kvist
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-15

4.  Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance.

Authors:  Clare L Ardern; Fionn Büttner; Renato Andrade; Adam Weir; Maureen C Ashe; Sinead Holden; Franco M Impellizzeri; Eamonn Delahunt; H Paul Dijkstra; Stephanie Mathieson; Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Guus Reurink; Catherine Sherrington; Emmanuel Stamatakis; Bill Vicenzino; Jackie L Whittaker; Alexis A Wright; Mike Clarke; David Moher; Matthew J Page; Karim M Khan; Marinus Winters
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 5.  Preliminary experience of an international orthopaedic registry: the ESSKA Paediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Initiative (PAMI) registry.

Authors:  Caroline Mouton; Håvard Moksnes; Rob Janssen; Christian Fink; Stefano Zaffagnini; Juan Carlos Monllau; Guri Ekås; Lars Engebretsen; Romain Seil
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-06-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.