Literature DB >> 31959622

The ethical case for non-directed postmortem sperm donation.

Nathan Hodson1, Joshua Parker2.   

Abstract

In this article we outline and defend the concept of voluntary non-directed postmortem sperm donation. This approach offers a potential means of increasing the quantity and heterogeneity of donor sperm. This is pertinent given the present context of a donor sperm shortage in the UK. Beyond making the case that it is technically feasible for dead men to donate their sperm for use in reproduction, we argue that this is ethically permissible. The inability to access donor sperm and the suffering this causes, we argue, justifies allowing access to sperm donated after death. Moreover, it is known that individuals and couples have desires for certain sperm donor characteristics which may not be fulfilled when numbers of sperm donors are low. Enacting these preferences contributes significantly to the well-being of intended parents, so we argue that this provides a pro tanto reason for respecting them. Finally, we explore the benefits and possible disadvantages of such a system for the various parties affected. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial insemination and surrogacy; cryobanking of sperm, ova or embryos; donation/procurement of organs/tissues; in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer; reproductive medicine

Year:  2020        PMID: 31959622     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  What can we learn about posthumous sperm retrieval after extra long-term follow-up?

Authors:  Itai Gat; Ana Umanski; Sarita Kaufman; Alon Kedem; Sarit Avraham; Michal Youngster; Gil Yerushalmi; Chen Kugel; Ariel Hourvitz; Osnat Levtzion-Korach
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 3.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.