Ali B Abbasi1, Elizabeth Salisbury-Afshar2, Craig E Berberet3, Jennifer E Layden4, Mai T Pho5. 1. Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: aba28@uchicago.edu. 2. Center for Addiction Research and Effective Solutions, American Institutes for Research, Washington, D.C. 3. Prescription Monitoring Program, Illinois Department of Human Services, Springfield, Illinois. 4. Office of the Director, Illinois Department of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although opioid prescribing has decreased since 2010, overdose deaths involving illicit opioids have continued to rise. This study explores prescribing patterns before fatal overdose of decedents who died of prescription and illicit opioid overdoses. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 2019 and included all 1,893 Illinois residents who died of an opioid-related overdose in 2016. Each decedent was linked to any existing Prescription Monitoring Program records, calculating weekly morphine milligram equivalents for 52 weeks before overdose. RESULTS: Among the 1,893 fatal opioid overdoses, 309 involved any prescription opioid and 1,461 involved illicit opioids without the involvement of prescription opioids. The death rate because of illicit opioids was 23/100,000 among black residents versus 10.5/100,000 among whites. During the last year of life, 76% of prescription opioid decedents filled any opioid prescription totaling 10.7 prescriptions per decedent, compared with 36% of illicit opioid decedents totaling 2.6 prescriptions per decedent. During the last week of life, 33% of prescription opioid decedents filled an opioid prescription totaling 0.42 prescriptions per decedent, compared with 4% of illicit opioid decedents totaling 0.05 prescriptions per decedent. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing patterns alone may not be sufficient to identify patients who are at high risk for opioid overdose, especially for those using illicit opioids. Interventions aimed at reducing opioid overdoses should take into account different patterns of opioid prescribing associated with illicit and prescription opioid overdose deaths and be designed around the local characteristics of the opioid overdose epidemic.
INTRODUCTION: Although opioid prescribing has decreased since 2010, overdose deaths involving illicit opioids have continued to rise. This study explores prescribing patterns before fatal overdose of decedents who died of prescription and illicit opioid overdoses. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 2019 and included all 1,893 Illinois residents who died of an opioid-related overdose in 2016. Each decedent was linked to any existing Prescription Monitoring Program records, calculating weekly morphine milligram equivalents for 52 weeks before overdose. RESULTS: Among the 1,893 fatal opioid overdoses, 309 involved any prescription opioid and 1,461 involved illicit opioids without the involvement of prescription opioids. The death rate because of illicit opioids was 23/100,000 among black residents versus 10.5/100,000 among whites. During the last year of life, 76% of prescription opioid decedents filled any opioid prescription totaling 10.7 prescriptions per decedent, compared with 36% of illicit opioid decedents totaling 2.6 prescriptions per decedent. During the last week of life, 33% of prescription opioid decedents filled an opioid prescription totaling 0.42 prescriptions per decedent, compared with 4% of illicit opioid decedents totaling 0.05 prescriptions per decedent. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing patterns alone may not be sufficient to identify patients who are at high risk for opioid overdose, especially for those using illicit opioids. Interventions aimed at reducing opioid overdoses should take into account different patterns of opioid prescribing associated with illicit and prescription opioid overdose deaths and be designed around the local characteristics of the opioid overdose epidemic.
Authors: Amy S B Bohnert; Mark A Ilgen; Rosalinda V Ignacio; John F McCarthy; Marcia Valenstein; Frederic C Blow Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Richard C Dart; Hilary L Surratt; Theodore J Cicero; Mark W Parrino; S Geoff Severtson; Becki Bucher-Bartelson; Jody L Green Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrew Kolodny; David T Courtwright; Catherine S Hwang; Peter Kreiner; John L Eadie; Thomas W Clark; G Caleb Alexander Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Ali B Abbasi; Elizabeth Salisbury-Afshar; Dejan Jovanov; Craig Berberet; Ponni Arunkumar; Steven E Aks; Jennifer E Layden; Mai T Pho Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Jane A Gwira Baumblatt; Caleb Wiedeman; John R Dunn; William Schaffner; Leonard J Paulozzi; Timothy F Jones Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Gery P Guy; Kun Zhang; Michele K Bohm; Jan Losby; Brian Lewis; Randall Young; Louise B Murphy; Deborah Dowell Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2017-07-07 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Eric Tatara; John Schneider; Madeline Quasebarth; Nicholson Collier; Harold Pollack; Basmattee Boodram; Sam Friedman; Elizabeth Salisbury-Afshar; Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti; Jonathan Ozik Journal: IEEE Int Symp Parallel Distrib Process Workshops Phd Forum Date: 2021-06-24
Authors: Joe Feinglass; Jessica Ann Wang; Jiancheng Ye; Robert Tessier; Howard Kim Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Joe Feinglass; Garth Walker; Rushmin Khazanchi; Kelsey Rydland; Robert Andrew Tessier; Maryann Mason Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Brittany E Punches; Rachel M Ancona; Caroline E Freiermuth; Jennifer L Brown; Michael S Lyons Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Date: 2021-06-22