Literature DB >> 31958518

Transcranial direct current stimulation improves risky decision making in women but not in men: A sham-controlled study.

J J León1, A Sánchez-Kuhn1, P Fernández-Martín1, M A Páez-Pérez1, C Thomas2, A Datta3, F Sánchez-Santed1, P Flores4.   

Abstract

Behavioral and anatomical sex-related differences have been traditionally found in decision-making processes assessed by Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). So far, the administration of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over orbitofrontal regions has shown an enhancing effect over decision-making. However, it is unknown whether there is a sex-dependent effect of stimulation in decision-making, a key question considering previous differences between men and women in IGT and the influence of individual differences in tDCS. The present study examines, at first time, the interaction between sex and tDCS in decision-making. For that aim, in a first experimental phase, ninety-two healthy participants performed the IGT. In a second phase, sixty-one participants received 20 min of anodal or sham tDCS over the right orbitofrontal cortex (rOFC) in a single-session pre-post sham-controlled study. To support the focality of the montage, a Stop Signal Task (SST) was used as a control task and also a numerical simulation of current flow distribution was performed. According to literature, in the first phase, results showed that men outperformed women in the IGT. In the second phase, the stimulation varied the IGT performance according to a sex specific manner: anodal tDCS increased the IGT performance in women, while in men; the stimulation did not produce any effect. Results were mediated by sex-specific morphological differences. These results highlight the necessity to consider the interaction of sex with the effect of the stimulation in future tDCS protocols, specifically in future clinical studies.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Iowa gambling task; Orbitofrontal cortex; Risky decision-making; Sex differences; Stop Signal task; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31958518     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  5 in total

1.  Sex difference in tDCS current mediated by changes in cortical anatomy: A study across young, middle and older adults.

Authors:  Sagarika Bhattacharjee; Rajan Kashyap; Alicia M Goodwill; Beth Ann O'Brien; Brenda Rapp; Kenichi Oishi; John E Desmond; S H Annabel Chen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 9.184

2.  Investigating the sex-dependent effects of prefrontal cortex stimulation on response execution and inhibition.

Authors:  Daniel J Fehring; Ranshikha Samandra; Zakia Z Haque; Shapour Jaberzadeh; Marcello Rosa; Farshad A Mansouri
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.027

3.  Sensorimotor performance after high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary somatosensory or motor cortices in men versus women.

Authors:  Yochai Swissa; Shlomi Hacohen; Jason Friedman; Silvi Frenkel-Toledo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces motivation to drink ethanol and reacquisition of ethanol self-administration in female mice.

Authors:  Solène Pedron; Stéphanie Dumontoy; Maria Del Carmen González-Marín; Fabien Coune; Andries Van Schuerbeek; Emmanuel Haffen; Mickael Naassila; Vincent Van Waes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Functional Effects of Bilateral Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulation During Sequential Decision-Making: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study With Offline Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Iryna Schommartz; Annika Dix; Susanne Passow; Shu-Chen Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.