Literature DB >> 31958461

Outcomes of early endoscopic intervention for pancreatic necrotic collections: a matched case-control study.

Nicholas Oblizajek1, Naoki Takahashi2, Sevda Agayeva1, Fateh Bazerbachi1, Vinay Chandrasekhara1, Michael Levy1, Andrew Storm1, Todd Baron3, Suresh Chari1, Ferga C Gleeson1, Randall Pearson1, Bret T Petersen1, Santhi Swaroop Vege1, Ryan Lennon4, Mark Topazian1, Barham K Abu Dayyeh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreatic necrosis may be categorized as an acute necrotic collection (ANC) or walled-off necrosis (WON) based on complete encapsulation by a wall and collection age (≤4 weeks or >4 weeks). Endoscopic intervention of WON has become the standard of care, but little is known regarding the safety and efficacy of endoscopic intervention of pancreatic necrosis ≤4 weeks from disease onset.
METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records and imaging studies of all patients undergoing early endoscopic intervention of pancreatic necrosis between 2008 and 2018 was carried out at 1 referral center. Patients who underwent previous interventional treatment were excluded. Control WON patients were matched to early intervention cases. The primary outcome was defined as resolution of the collection after endoscopic treatment, without surgery.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients with early intervention were identified. The most common indication for intervention was infection. Median age of these collections at the time of initial endoscopic intervention was 23 days (range, 15-27 days), and all collections had a partial or complete wall discernable on contrast-enhanced CT. Eleven patients underwent concurrent endoscopic necrosectomy. The primary outcome was achieved in all patients in the early intervention group. Total duration of therapy was longer for early intervention compared with controls (103 vs 69 days, P = .042), with no mortality and similar adverse event rates compared with controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic intervention of pancreatic necrosis in the third and fourth weeks of illness appears effective and safe when a partial collection wall is present on cross-sectional imaging studies, with outcomes paralleling those reported for intervention of WON.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31958461     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  10 in total

1.  Safety and clinical outcomes of early dual modality drainage (< 28 days) compared to later drainage of pancreatic necrotic fluid collections: a propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Shivanand Bomman; David Sanders; David Coy; Danielle La Selva; Quincy Pham; Troy Zehr; Joanna Law; Michael Larsen; Shayan Irani; Richard A Kozarek; Andrew Ross; Rajesh Krishnamoorthi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 2.  Drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in acute pancreatitis: A comprehensive overview.

Authors:  Akash Bansal; Pankaj Gupta; Anupam K Singh; Jimil Shah; Jayanta Samanta; Harshal S Mandavdhare; Vishal Sharma; Saroj Kant Sinha; Usha Dutta; Manavjit Singh Sandhu; Rakesh Kochhar
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 1.534

3.  Abbreviated non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis.

Authors:  Akash Bansal; Rajath Ramegowda; Pankaj Gupta; Jimil Shah; Jayanta Samanta; Harshal Mandavdhare; Vishal Sharma; Rakesh Kochhar; Manavjit Singh Sandhu
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-05-04

4.  Comparison of endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage of symptomatic pancreatic necrosis in the early (< 4 weeks) phase of illness.

Authors:  Surinder Singh Rana; Suhang Verma; Mandeep Kang; Ujjwal Gorsi; Ravi Sharma; Rajesh Gupta
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

5.  Early endoscopic treatment of symptomatic pancreatic necrotic collections.

Authors:  Mateusz Jagielski; Jacek Piątkowski; Marek Jackowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Endoscopic Transmural Drainage and Necrosectomy in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Review.

Authors:  Linlin Feng; Jintao Guo; Sheng Wang; Xiang Liu; Nan Ge; Guoxin Wang; Siyu Sun
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2021-09-28

7.  Immediate Catheter Drainage Versus Delayed Drainage in the Management of Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Wahidullah Dost; Farzad Qasemi; Wahida Ali; Tahmina Aini; Mohammad Qaher Rasully; Jamaluddin Niazi; Rana Sarhadi Jamal; Maseha Sayer; Laila Tul Qadar; Sultan Masoud Shah Afzali
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 8.  Invasive intervention timing for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: Late invasive intervention is not late for collection.

Authors:  Nian-Jun Xiao; Ting-Ting Cui; Fang Liu; Wen Li
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 1.534

9.  Endoscopic step up: When and how.

Authors:  Vaneet Jearth; Surinder S Rana
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-09-17

Review 10.  Early versus delayed interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yousuke Nakai; Hideyuki Shiomi; Tsuyoshi Hamada; Shogo Ota; Mamoru Takenaka; Takuji Iwashita; Tatsuya Sato; Tomotaka Saito; Atsuhiro Masuda; Saburo Matsubara; Keisuke Iwata; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Hiroyuki Isayama; Ichiro Yasuda
Journal:  DEN open       Date:  2022-10-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.